Preview

Euthyphro And Socrates Dialogue Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthyphro And Socrates Dialogue Analysis
Euthyphro
Conversations between Socrates and Euthyphro can often times be difficult to follow and understand however, with careful reading and critical analyzing, much can be gained and inferred. This can be seen in the many great and intellectual conversations that were had in class last week. A combination of my own interpretations as well as those of my peers allowed for the whole class to gain a deeper understanding of this reading. As a brief overview, we were able to discuss the difference between knowledge and opinion, the use of irony within the conversation and how it affects the reading, and the relationship between piety and justice.
One of the main points of conversation during this dialogue included the difference between opinion
…show more content…
It was unlike people to prosecute their family at this time in Athens. When Euthyphro says, “For, they say, it is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder. But their ideas of the divine attitude to piety and impiety are wrong, Socrates.” (Plato, 4e). Socrates is quick to question Euthyphro and his knowledge on the subject of piety, Socrates says “Whereas by Zeus, Euthyphro, you think that your knowledge of the divine, and of piety and impiety, is so accurate that, when those things happened as you say, you have no fear of having acted impiously in bringing your father to trial?” (Plato, 4e). This begins the discussion on finding a definition for piety and the relationship between piety and justice. Socrates sees that Euthyphro has strong belief toward doing what is pious because that is what is just. Socrates uses his way of questioning and irony to persuade Euthyphro to tell him what it means to be pious. After many suggestions the two men never find a solid definition for piety. Euthyphro has to leave at the end of the dialogue and Socrates gets upset because he felt that Euthyphro was his way of escaping the indictment by Meletus that Socrates is impious (Plato,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Euthyphro, we are presented with the conversation between Euthyphro and Socrates. The conversation begins when Socrates comes to find that Euthyphro is prosecuting his father on the charges of murder of a murderer. Euthyphro explains that his family and friends believe that his course of action on his father to be impious. He then explains that they have mistaken his impiousness and that they are ignorant to the true nature of piety. This entices Socrates, since he himself his being prosecuted for corrupting the young and not believing in the same gods as in which the city he lives. He believes that Euthyphro holds the answer to the definite “form” of piety and impiety. Socrates then begins to examine Euthyphro through the Elenchus; a way of asking questions in order to ascertain the Form; since Euthyphro should know all that is piety.…

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro is a priest, a specialist in religious matters and claiming his highly science. His official role in the city is to examine the merits of the charges as those against Socrates. For a long time it was considered that this soothsayer embodied religious orthodoxy, popular traditional religious beliefs and Plato wanted to show that such a representative was unable to define piety, and thus prevent that Socrates was condemned for impiety. Socrates victim zealots of traditional religion. This thesis has been criticized in the early 20th century and has emerged a very different interpretation that reigned supreme for seventy years: Euthyphro would rather eccentric, fanatic distinguishing clearly the average religiosity of its citizens ...…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro, a religious expert, who he runs into outside of a courthouse in Athens. Socrates was being indicted on the charges of corrupting the youth, and Euthyphro was prosecuting his own father for murder. Socrates was bewildered as to why Euthyphro would indict his own blood of a crime. In an attempt to explain to Socrates why it was the right thing to do, Euthyphro proclaims that he is acting piously by taking his father to court. Euthyphro adds that his relatives are mad at him because “it is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder. But their ideas of the divine attitude to piety and impiety are wrong” (4e). Because of this, Socrates enquires about what Euthyphro believes piety truly is, to which he provides his four definitions that Socrates ultimately disagrees with.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout their conversation with one another, Socrates sets up Euthyphro to contradict himself to prove that he is not as much of an expert as he thinks he is on religious matters. Where Socrates trips up Euthyphro is on his definition of piety. The original concept Euthyphro claimed was that something is pious if it is loved by the gods, and it is pious based off of that alone. Socrates continues to pose questions to Euthyphro on this idea, as it is a very vague definition that does not give very much insight into what piety exactly is. Eventually, Socrates asks if something pious is loved by the gods because it is in fact pious, or is it pious solely because it is loved by the gods? This is where this concept begins to unravel. Euthyphro…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doesn’t the same hold for all the other things? Don’t you call shapes and colours admirable on the account of either some pleasure or benefit or both?…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an analysis of Plato’s Euthyphro, Peter Geach claims that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy when he refuses Euthyphro’s first definition of piety. Socrates rejects the definition given because it does not give a formal definition of what piety is, but instead offers examples of things and actions that are pious. Geach believes that this is a substantial fallacy committed by Socrates, one that may prevent him from getting at the truth of the matter. I will first expand on Geach’s Socratic fallacy, as well as explain why this fallacy presents itself as a problem for Geach. Then I will examine Euthyphro to see if Geach is correct in assuming that Socrates commits the Socratic fallacy. In addition to Euthyphro, I will look at another one…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the passage Euthyphro written by Plato a discussion arises dealing with the question “What is piety”? This question arises after a man named Euthyphro is found walking into a courthouse preparing to prosecute against his own father who took part in a murder. His friend Socrates eventually confronts him when he sees him and once the story is explained to Socrates and once he calms down due to being surprised that Euthyphro is prosecuting against his own father he asks Euthyphro what exactly he considers the definition of piety and impiety to be.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Euthyphro, Socrates questions Euthyphro's prosecution of his father for murder. Their dialogue is a result of Socrates attempt to understand what is good and righteous. Socrates does not put much value in the ability of the people to judge the character of a person because his perception is that the people are easily swayed. "Athenians don't much care, it seems to me, if they think someone clever, so long as he's not imparting his wisdom to others; but once they think…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro's View Of Piety

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthyphro first concludes that “the pious is loved by the gods, and the opposite, which all the gods hate, is impious” (Plato, 173), Socrates main criticism of this point is that the language seems rather ambiguous and that it provides no true clarity, eluding that piety is an inherent quality of a deed or action rather than a cause of an action. Euthyphro’s interpretation of piety evolves as it is noted that an action “is loved then because it is pious, but it is not pious because it is loved” (Plato, 173). This quote is then reinforced by a second related point asserting that the pious action “because it is loved by the gods it is being loved and is dear to the gods” (Plato, 174). Socrates bases his criticism of these statements on the grounds that they contradict one another offering that “the one is of a nature to be loved because it is loved, the other is loved because it is of a nature to be loved” (Plato, 174). Both men agree that an action can be loved by the gods because it is pious, however Socrates conclusions appear sound as he reasons that Euthyphro’s interpretation of piety is flawed and that an action is not deemed pious simply because it is loved by the…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Piety Analysis

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This series of short dialogues begins with Socrates conversing with young Euthyphro, a religious expert who is prosecuting his own father for murder. Since Socrates is charged of being impious and Euthyphro is an expert at what is and is not holy, a series of questioning ensues. Socrates asks for Euthyphro to define piety in such a way that it be universally true for all cultures at any time. This definition of piety will be the standard against which all actions can be measured to determine whether or not an action is holy. After a short series of questions and answers as to the definition of piety, Socrates finally asks Euthyphro if the pious is loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods. This…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Nature Of Piety

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plato’s dialogue of Euthyphro shows the complexity in determining the nature of piety. Socrates questions Euthyphro and learns that Euthyphro gives examples rather than a concrete definition. He tries to persuade Euthyphro from thinking of piety in association with divine gods.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This text begins with Thrasymachus eagerly and angrily, jumping into the conversation between Socrates and others on the topic of justice. Thrasymachus immediately attacks Socrates verbally on his manner of teaching others. Stating that Socrates is merely babbling nonsense, Thrasymachus believes that if Socrates actually knows what justice is, he should simply state it and not go through repetitive questioning and counter exampling.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthyphro – Plato

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On his way to his trial, Socrates runs into his friend Euthyphro, there to prosecute his own father for the murder of a slave. From this state of affairs, Socrates engages Euthyphro in a dialogue that begins with questions regarding piousness and ends up unsatisfactorily attempting to come to a true answer. In the course of this discussion, definitions of concept of holiness emerge, only to be picked apart by Socrates. Ultimately, Socrates’ goal is a new definition of piety and subtle rejection of the very idea of gods, paving the way for Plato’s defense of his wrongly accused teacher.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Euthyphro dialogue, Socrates poses the question: “And is then all that is just pious? Or is all that is pious just, but not all that is just pious, but some of it is and some is not?” (11e-12a). Socrates answers this question by claiming piety is a subset of justice: “This is the kind of thing I was asking before, whether where there is piety there is also justice, but where there is not always piety, for the pious is part of justice” (12d). This can be understood as that if there is piety, there is justice, but if there is justice, there is not necessarily piety. Justice, then, is a category that contains piety. Moreover, justice is a dichotomous category containing two types of justice: piety, as mentioned, and care of men, or good will towards men. Piety, then, is “care of the gods, while that concerned with the care of men is the remaining part of justice” (12e). Caring for other men entails that one must do what is for “the good and the benefit of the object cared for” (13b). This further entails that one should not harm others since harm is not for the good or benefit of fellow men. In fact, for Socrates, doing harm is identical to doing wrong, which is clear when he states that “doing people harm is no different from wrongdoing” (49c). Furthermore, since all doing of harm is wrong, even vengeance is wrong because vengeance is doing wrong in return for wrong received. This consequentialist ethic required Socrates to refuse to attempt an escape from his impending execution despite his friend’s suggestion since to break the Athenian law and sentence which Socrates agreed to would be harming the state and paying vengeance (see…

    • 2410 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First dialogue of this book is Euthyphro, which contains the characters Socrates, Euthyphro, and Meletus. Inside this dialogue Socrates is being tried in court by Meletus who we don’t actually meet, but just hear his name frequently. While in Athens, Socrates meets Euthyphro, who is bringing his father to court for a murder, and the two begin to talk. Socrates starts to ask Euthyphro about religiousness and holiness to try and possibly help him in his upcoming court case. After hearing some definitions of holiness from Euthyphro, Socrates begin to question him on these theories. Euthyphro’s greatest attempt to explain holiness was, “whatever is holy is approved by all gods.” This led to lots of questioning by Socrates and into an elaborate argument about gods and holiness. After the argument continues and…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays