Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Euthanasia Should Be Legalised in Australia

Good Essays
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia Should Be Legalised in Australia
Voluntary euthanasia should be legalized in Australia. For years, there has been much global debate on this topic. Euthanasia is the hastening of death for a suffering, terminally ill person. Indeed, the term euthanasia quite literally means ‘good death’ in Greek. As Australians and as human beings, we should have the freedom of choice to decide a quiet death when we have no chance of life. Euthanasia is a dignified way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients.

In essence, we are autonomous people with a right to self-sufficiency, independence and to self-regulation, so why should we not have the right to choose whether or not our lives should end if there is little or no hope of recovery? Even health professionals in Australia must treat in accordance with the patient. It is hard to put your feet in the shoes of these patients. They are suffering, and quiet literally dying. If the inevitable is near-future death, why not end it now and take the emotional and physical stress off the patient and their loved ones. Some opposing the idea may say if euthanasia is allowed, it can easily be abused. Of course, the legal system must be designed to not permit the misuse of the law. Before a patient is even offered euthanasia, his or her mental stability must be considered, that is, is the patient competent enough to make a sound decision? Also financial and domestic problems of the patient must be taken into account by the board of professionals regulating euthanasia in our health system. In 2009 Newspoll discovered a huge 85% of Australians support euthanasia. 85% believe that people have the right to choose voluntary, quiet death when in immense suffering.

Secondly, euthanasia is a choice that concerns quality of life. We all have different standards regarding quality of life. For some being clinically alive is enough to mean that you should continue to live. However for others, being clinically alive is simply inadequate. Some would argue that allowing euthanasia would be allowing suicide. Euthanasia is very different to suicide. Suicide does not help a person and is used as the ‘easy way out’ of solving problems in life. Suicidal patients can be given treatment such as counseling, rehabilitation, etc. In contrast, euthanasia is when someone voluntarily dies when there is no known way to recover physical and mental health. Euthanasia is definitely not cowardly. If a person’s life is lacking in self-awareness or an intrinsic presence as a human being due to extreme physical suffering, then that person should be able to choose a dignified death rather than an undignified existence.

In conclusion, throughout this essay, the meaning of being ‘terminally ill’ has constantly been accentuated. It means to suffer. To give your loved ones great grief. To be awaiting near-future death. To be given no hope of surviving. To be dying. At the end of the day, when it concerns our lives, we should be focusing on what we want, what we believe in- not what society wants us to do. Legalise voluntary euthanasia and put the right to die in the hands of that patient where it rightfully belongs.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ladies and gentlemen, my argument for the moral justification of euthanasia rests on the premise of mercy and compassion, two ideals which are essential to human dignity. In most cases when a person requests euthanasia they are suffering unrelenting and continual pain, and there is no reasonable possibility of substantial recovery. It is morally repugnant to watch another person suffer through humiliating helplessness and constant pain when one could prevent it. It is widely considered humane to put animals that are permanently…

    • 830 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia, formally known as mercy killing, is the act of intentionally causing the painless death of a sick person, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. In terms of a physician's actions, it can be passive in that a physician plays no direct role in the death of the person or it can be active in that the physician does something directly to cause the death (Yount, 2002). Euthanasia may also be formed into three types of act, which are voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary. Voluntary involves killing the patient at his or her request. Involuntary occurs when the patient does not give consent, or refuses. Nonvoluntary is where the patient is not able to make the decision about their medical treatment so it is up to a third party to make the decision for them (Yount, 2002). Legalizing euthanasia would cause many complications because we are dealing with a very controversial issue that brings into focus some extremely powerful, conflicting, and competing values. Under the Canadian Criminal Code, active voluntary euthanasia is illegal and individuals can be convicted for 14 years for murder (Ogden & Young, 2000). Passive euthanasia has been legal because the courts have recognized the right of a patient to refuse and to terminate unwanted medical treatments. The question that remains today is whether legalizing active euthanasia in Canada could either benefit or harm not only the individuals involved, but also society as a whole.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia not only gives the patient the opportunity to stop their suffering, it also gives them autonomy. According to Thomas Preston, professor of medicine, a retired cardiologist and a former board member of Compassion in Dying “society must protect the right of terminally ill patients to choose euthanasia.” (Euthanasia 53) By euthanasia being legal, we have been unconsciously giving the patient the autonomy of whether they want to continue living or not. We as human beings can only perceive the outside of a person, however, we could never really know what they may be going through or suffering. Sometimes, individuals are so self-centered that would prefer to have their loved ones alive and in pain than giving them the freedom to choose between life and death. After all, each person is the owner of his or her life and should be able to decide what is best for them.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In at least some cases, active euthanasia promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights, therefore, at least in some cases, active euthanasia is morally permissible.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 249) This is the strongest argument for active euthanasia in my opinion. Those who oppose this argument may claim that euthanasia is not in the best interests of all parties involved. The parties referenced are usually the friends/family/doctors and their grief over the situation or even the hospital and its shareholders losing money from the patient. First off, any person who wants to keep a family member alive who is in extreme pain for the sole reason of wanting to prolong being able to interact with them or to offset their own period of suffering following the family member’s death is incredibly selfish. The logical conclusion would be that family and friends of the patient would be relieved by their quick and early passing because of the avoidance of a month of suffering. Yes, of course the family and friends of the patient will experience emotional trauma from the passing of their loved one, but in due time the loved one you will pass whether they like it or not. Second, when it comes to financial losses to the hospital and its shareholders, those who would put monetary gain over the wellbeing of another human being have…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    People in Canada are diagnosed with terminal illness’ every day. They know when they are going to die and often suffer until then. Why can’t patients diagnosed with a terminal illness be given the option to be euthanized? It would allow such patients to die painlessly and peacefully instead of having to suffer. While currently illegal in all but five areas of the world, assisted suicide and euthanasia are quickly becoming a more prevalent topic globally with more and more countries looking at making the move to legalize the acts. It has been legalized nationally in countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium while also being legalized in the states of Oregon and Washington in the United States of America. The article from the New England Journal of Medicine, Redefining Physicians` Role in Assisted Dying by Lisa Lehmann, uses the state of Oregon as a basis for much of her research and probing into both sides of the argument behind euthanasia. Margaret Somerville, a world renown ethicist and academic known for some of her controversial views, also gives her own insight into the topic in the article Legalized Euthanasia Only a Breath Away, published by the Globe and Mail. Somerville bases much of her argument around personal opinions and strong beliefs. I will examine the merits and proposals brought forth by each author and compare them to each other.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasi-Keep It Illegal

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthanasia is defined as "a painless killing, especially to end a painful and incurable disease; mercy killing". It is one of society 's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. This topic has pained and exhausted the courts in several countries throughout the world, for too long, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. Euthanasia must not be legalized in Canada for many moral and medical reasons.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Euthanasia is defined by the Oxford Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2013) as “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” The word euthanasia originates from the Greek words, “eu” meaning good, and “thantos” meaning death, however the topic of this type of “good death” has become highly debatable in Australia. Sometimes referred to as “assisted suicide” and “mercy killing,” euthanasia gives people their own right to die through painless suicide, however done so at their own free will, making it voluntary. Once legalised in the Northern Territory for nine months under the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995, euthanasia is…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this presentation I’ll explain why voluntary euthanasia should be legalised in Australia when a person is suffering from a terminal illness or are already in the late stages of an illness that cannot be cured.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument needs to be settled so people can either go through the process or not even have the option. If patients cannot obtain euthanasia then there needs to be more ways that will ensure patients less pain and suffering for them. IN the future, hopefully the Unites States will legalize euthanasia or find a better alternative than euthanasia that will allow patients to die with dignity. People of the United States and all over the world cannot live in fear of what might be right or might be wrong, chances need to be taken to understand and develop more. To end with is a quotes from “Doctor Death, Jack Kevorkian, and “My ultimate aim is to make euthanasia a positive experience.” (Euthanasia…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthanasia is often a controversial topic around all areas of the world. The idea of ‘assisted suicide’ has sparked debates and many countries, including Australia, are still hesitant or reluctant in allowing legislation for legalising Euthanasia to pass. This inquiry will aim to provide sufficient evidence as to why and how Euthanasia should become legalised while also evaluating and examining other cases and laws in other states regarding this topic.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first person to be legally voluntarily euthanised in Australia was Bob Dent in the Northern Territory, in the year of 1996. This controversial issue has raised many dilemmas throughout society, and so far it seems there is no clear solution. The implications of euthanasia will be discussed herein. Defining the issue and exploring both sides of the controversy has proven to be a difficult task.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the past decade the issue of euthanasia has gained vast support on both of the opposing sides, it continues to be one of the most controversial issues in modern day Britain. The most common form of euthanasia is assisted suicide in which someone suffering from a terminal illness such as multiple sclerosis would ask a family member to aid them in ending their life by whatever means necessary. The general view of euthanasia is the as straight forward as flicking a switch and should be legal based on that juvenile belief. In reality euthanasia can be dissected to reveal an array of tiers in which the simple action is not as clear-cut as it is portrayed. These tiers take the forms of passive, active, voluntary and involuntary. The view is those that oppose euthanasia is based largely on the belief in palliative care and religious reasoning, in which life is portrayed as a gift from god and ending life prematurely is fundamentally wrong. These opposing views are ethical and frequently changing and adapting based largely on public opinion conversely the views of the law is constant and until recently was never questioned yet since the introduction of the European Courts of Human Rights into Britain there has been more and more demand for reform to allow for euthanasia under certain circumstances. It is essential that both sides of the debate…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Euthanasia, or doctor assisted suicide, has been subject of controversy in North America for a number of decades. Prior to the argument of whether or not euthanasia should be legalized for the terminally ill, it is important to differentiate between the two types of doctor assisted suicide. Passive euthanasia is withholding treatment necessary for ones health and allowing nature to take its course. Active euthanasia, the most controversial of the two, is the use of forces, such as lethal injections that will directly result in death. With that being said, doctor assisted suicide should be legalized for the terminally ill. It is within a persons own choice whether they wish to live or die, if they decide there is no longer a quality of life, they should be allowed the choice. If consent is given from the patient as well as next of kin, there should not be an issue with fulfilling ones dying wish. Finally, when one is terminally ill, it is inevitable that the disease will deteriorate at the physical health, and eventually they will die. If one decides they do not wish to suffer, and wish to die with dignity, that should be an option. Euthanasia is controversial for a number of reasons, however, if boundaries and restrictions are negotiated, it is possible to better accommodate the wishes of patients who are suffering an inevitable death.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Death is not the enemy doctor. Inhumanity is” (Rebman 5.) This quote was said by 78 year old Eli Kahn. He placed on a respirator machine in order to keep him alive but against his wishes. Eli Kahn was among countless people in this world that face an inevitable death who are not given the choice of preventing the pain and suffering. Euthanasia is a word that most people avoid because it is very controversial. But why? Euthanasia is a way of ending the prolonging of suffering, while leaving life in peace. Euthanasia is derived from the Greeks where Eu means good and Thanatos means death. When these phrases are combined the word euthanasia is created; meaning “good death” (6.) There are three types of euthanasia although only two are authentic forms. The first type is active euthanasia. It is described as death by a person through direct action. The second form is passive euthanasia, or the act of removing a life supporting system such as a feeding tube or respirator resulting in nature to taking its course. The third type of euthanasia is called involuntary euthanasia which means euthanasia committed against a person wishes; it is more commonly considered murder (7.) I believe that active and passive euthanasia should be allowed in terminally ill patients. After examining to pros and cons as well as actual cases, it is clear that active and passive euthanasia should be allowed in terminally ill patients despite the issues people may have with it.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays