Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Euthanasia

Good Essays
1841 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia
Stephanie Rasic
Mr. Ozimok
HSB4M
June 16, 2013

Euthanasia

Euthanasia, or doctor assisted suicide, has been subject of controversy in North America for a number of decades. Prior to the argument of whether or not euthanasia should be legalized for the terminally ill, it is important to differentiate between the two types of doctor assisted suicide. Passive euthanasia is withholding treatment necessary for ones health and allowing nature to take its course. Active euthanasia, the most controversial of the two, is the use of forces, such as lethal injections that will directly result in death. With that being said, doctor assisted suicide should be legalized for the terminally ill. It is within a persons own choice whether they wish to live or die, if they decide there is no longer a quality of life, they should be allowed the choice. If consent is given from the patient as well as next of kin, there should not be an issue with fulfilling ones dying wish. Finally, when one is terminally ill, it is inevitable that the disease will deteriorate at the physical health, and eventually they will die. If one decides they do not wish to suffer, and wish to die with dignity, that should be an option. Euthanasia is controversial for a number of reasons, however, if boundaries and restrictions are negotiated, it is possible to better accommodate the wishes of patients who are suffering an inevitable death.

North Americans are consistently told throughout life that they have the freedom of choice. People living in North America are allowed the freedom of their jobs, religion, and even sexual preference. In a society so adamant about establishing freedom for all, it only makes sense for the terminally ill to be given freedom to do with their lives as they please. If one believes there is no longer a quality of life they wish to sustain, they should have an option to be peacefully laid to rest. "Mercy killing" is another term for euthanasia, the definition of the word mercy is "compassionate treatment", the word "compassion" means sympathetic and tender-hearted. Euthanasia is a sympathetic and tender hearted gesture to put a patient who is terminally ill out of suffering. In 1992, Sue Rodriguez, a resident of British Columbia made headlines as she fought for her right to a dignified death. The 41 year old mother, who was diagnosed with ALS or "Lou Gehrig's disease" made her dying wishes very clear. Sue Rodriguez wished to spend her last lucid and capable moments with her child, however, she expressed that when she began deteriorating and was confined to a hospital bed, she did not want to sit and suffer. Unfortunately, in a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court, Sue Rodriguez was denied her right to die. Despite the unfortunate loss Sue Rodriguez faced at the Supreme Court, this became a landmark case for the controversy surrounding euthanasia. The Supreme Court is the only force standing in the way of legalizing euthanasia, and questions are raised as to why the Supreme Court is so resistant of this change. In a society where freedom is constantly expressed, the freedom for one to die a dignified death should be legal. Especially when the individual in question is already suffering from an inevitable death. Apparently, this is a society that is full of freedom and opportunity for the people who live in it, unless one is diagnosed with an incurable and painful disease. In Canada, there are no laws against suicide for many reasons, however assisted suicide is punishable for up to 14 years. However, it is the exact same thing. It is an individual who wishes to die, they are just not physically able to commit suicide because of their illness. This society needs to do major re evaluating on the subject of doctor assisted suicide, it will only help a suffering individual prior to the disease becoming more and more painful.

When one is diagnosed with a terminal illness, it is not only devastating for the individual, but for the individuals family as well. Though it is very shocking and upsetting for the individual and their family, when one is diagnosed with a terminal illness, death is already accepted. A terminal illness means "a malignant disease that cannot be cured or adequately treated that is reasonably expected to result in the death of the patient in a short period of time." With that being said, it is quite obvious that when one is diagnosed with a terminal illness, death has already been accepted by the individual and their family. If one decides they do not wish to be confined to a hospital bed in suffering until they die, the option of active euthanasia should be available. As of right now, passive euthanasia is legal. The problem with passive euthanasia being legal is that it is often much more painful to the patient than active euthanasia would be. Something such as turning off a machine that helps the patient breathe is extremely painful for the patient, and they could be in this pain for several minutes, even hours. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to opt to legalize the more painful method of something that gives the patient the same result. Many argue that euthanasia is "murder", while this is understandable in its own right, however, under the circumstances this option should be available. The only strong arguments against the legalization of euthanasia are the ethical issues surrounding it. Yes, it does involve a physician putting a patient to death. A patient who is suffering, who is slowly dying a painful death. We see forms of euthanasia everyday in veterinarian clinics. When an animal becomes too old or too sick, they are put to death. Not because the owner does not wish to deal with a dying animal, but because the owner sees their pet is suffering, and they know there is a way to prevent the suffering. When a terminally ill patient seeks doctor assisted suicide, their family is almost always on their side for the decision. However Supreme Court judges, strangers to the patient and their family, are making the decisions for them. In 2009, bill c-384, which would have legalized euthanasia was thrown out by a losing vote of approximately 150. The Canadian Supreme Court is very resistant of change. Many believe this is because they do not wish to be criticized if a change is made. However, euthanasia would just be an option, not a requirement for the terminally ill. It is devastating for someone who has been diagnosed with an incurable disease, yet many are not given the option to end their suffering. The fact that strangers are creating these decisions for patients is completely absurd. This is not their family, they do not know what decision is in the patients best interest. The patients deserve this option when what they are facing is already hard enough, and their voice is not heard, it is completely tragic. With the consent of the patient as well as their family members, there is absolutely no reason that euthanasia should not be an option that is available.

There are many reasons why doctor assisted suicide should be legal in Canada. Apart from the fact that it would help a patient who is experiencing a slow and painful death, it would also help healthcare. The hospitals are spending large amounts of money keeping patients alive who are inevitably facing death. Many of these patients wish they could have the option of doctor assisted suicide, it does not make sense as to why they are not allowed this option. If given this option, the dying patient and their family gets their wish fulfilled and the hospital saves money that they would have spent on the healthcare of said individual. It is a "win-win" situation, however, at the moment the laws restricting euthanasia are still standing. A dying patient wishes to die with dignity. While they are still coherent, this way they have the ability to say goodbye to their family, and to die the way they will always be remembered. Without the legalization of euthanasia, they do not get this option. A terminal illness often deteriorates the health of the patient to the point where they are incoherent or even comatose. They do not get to say goodbye to their family on their dying days, and they are not the same person they were when they were healthy. That is quite possibly the most devastating of all; that a dying patient who could potentially die peacefully, the way they want to, is denied this right.
"Supporters of euthanasia state that everyone should have the same degree of control in choosing the circumstances surrounding their death as they do in choosing the manner in which they live." (Economist.com, 1997). This quotation really does express the point that euthanasia is a personal decision based on the way one who is terminally ill wishes to spend the remainder of their life. Doctors have the power to create life, yet it is viewed as morally unacceptable for them to have the power to put an end to someones life who is suffering. Society must change their views on what is morally acceptable and what is not, because if one is suffering from a disease that will deteriorate their health until they die, they should be allowed the option of getting out prior to the suffering, prior to them becoming comatose or incoherent.

In conclusion, active euthanasia should be legalized for the terminally ill. When one is diagnosed with a disease that is sure to result in death, with no cure, they should be allowed the right to a dignified death. Like stated above, an individual deserves to have control in the circumstances surrounding their death, especially because in this society, it is always expressed how wonderful it is that so much freedom is available. The cold hard truth is, nobody should have the right to decide somebody else's fate. The individual suffering from the disease should be the only one who has any say in what they wish to do with their life. The people who are the decision makers regarding the law on euthanasia do not have to deal with a terminal illness. They do not feel the constant pain and suffering involving an incurable disease. When death has already been accepted by the individual and their family, and it is their wish to be put out of their suffering, this should absolutely be available for them. There is just so much that would be positive if euthanasia was legalized. Especially because it would just be an option, not a requirement. It would help the individuals and families who would like that option, and it would help the hospitals save money. Eventually, society will begin to accept that it cannot decide fate. For now, the debate on the euthanasia has been lost, however, it only takes the effort of one to change it. It is undeniable that the voices of terminally ill patients will soon be heard.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    With that being said, there are two main types of euthanasia called active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia describes actively attempting to end a patient’s life by means of drugs or a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is defined as removing or withholding a medicine or treatment that could have prolonged the patient’s life. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not passive euthanasia is as morally wrong as active euthanasia. Some claim that passive euthanasia is not a direct violation of the basic good of human life, therefore it is morally permissible. They declare active euthanasia, on the other hand, is a direct violation, and therefore is not morally permissible. I will concede that this statement is technically true in a few rare situations, but in the majority of passive euthanasia cases, the patient is being taken off life support because he is tired of living and simply wants to die. And if that is the case, who’s to tell some terminally ill patient that he’s just going to have to live out his remaining days off treatment in pain and without hope. If a terminal patient wants to die, he should be accommodated not simply ignored. If some patients would like to refuse treatment, and live out the rest of their days naturally, that’s their decision too. It’s the patient’s life. Doctors should act on the requests of their patients, not what…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all terminally ill patients will choose this option, but it should be available for those who want it. Coping with the diagnosis of a terminal illness is difficult for both the patient and the patient’s loved ones and it only becomes more difficult as the disease progresses. Being given the ability to decide when to die allows the patient to feel a sense of dignity and control during a time when he or she may not have control over anything else in life. Not only does physician-assisted suicide provide a sense of relief to the patient, it provides relief to family and friends. Watching a loved one die is one of the most challenging things to endure in life. It only becomes more challenging when forced to watch a loved one die a slow and painful death. Physician-assisted suicide can provide closure to everyone involved in a situation dealing with a terminal illness; therefore, it must become legal in all fifty…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    People in Canada are diagnosed with terminal illness’ every day. They know when they are going to die and often suffer until then. Why can’t patients diagnosed with a terminal illness be given the option to be euthanized? It would allow such patients to die painlessly and peacefully instead of having to suffer. While currently illegal in all but five areas of the world, assisted suicide and euthanasia are quickly becoming a more prevalent topic globally with more and more countries looking at making the move to legalize the acts. It has been legalized nationally in countries such as the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium while also being legalized in the states of Oregon and Washington in the United States of America. The article from the New England Journal of Medicine, Redefining Physicians` Role in Assisted Dying by Lisa Lehmann, uses the state of Oregon as a basis for much of her research and probing into both sides of the argument behind euthanasia. Margaret Somerville, a world renown ethicist and academic known for some of her controversial views, also gives her own insight into the topic in the article Legalized Euthanasia Only a Breath Away, published by the Globe and Mail. Somerville bases much of her argument around personal opinions and strong beliefs. I will examine the merits and proposals brought forth by each author and compare them to each other.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States and countries all over the world, the topic of assisted suicide or euthanasia has become highly controversial because it is hard for people determine if it is moral or not. This became more known and debated about in the public eye in the early ninety’s by the actions of Doctor Jack Kevorkian. He assisted in the deaths of over 130 terminally ill patients all while being in the public spotlight. Assisted suicide is defined as the process by which an individual, who may otherwise be incapable, is provided with the means (drugs or equipment) to commit suicide. In some cases, the terms “aid in dying” or “death in dignity” are preferred. Many patients that are terminally ill have to suffer serious and unbearable pain day in and day out and can do nothing but try and tame the pain until their time is up. Everybody who lives wants to live their life with dignity, and in turn die with dignity. This is being prevented by prolonging the pain and suffering of the patient’s life. It should be the decision of the person whose life it is to determine whether or not they are still actually living with dignity and choose if they want to continue to suffer, affecting not only them but they’re families as well. There are only three states in the U.S. in which assisted suicide is legal, and they have a very rigid guideline to determine who qualifies as terminally ill. The first state to pass a pro euthanasia law was Oregon, followed by Washington and Montana. I believe more states should adopt similar laws because it allows patients who truly desire to end their life in dignity to do so, along with preventing patients that aren’t terminally ill and don’t fit the strict requirements from engaging in physician assisted suicide. The right to die is a fundamental freedom of all people and so is the right to end suffering, which is why it should be legalized and not frowned upon in the eyes of society.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia should be legalized to allow terminally ill patients the opportunity to prepare for their deaths, avoid unnecessary pain and die with dignity. Euthanasia is “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” (Am. Heritage) The literal meaning of the word euthanasia, "‘an easy or happy death,’ from the Greek word eu- ‘good’, and thanatos ‘death’"(Harper), is proof in itself that the whole idea is to help people and not to belittle the value of life. The fact that suffering animals can be put out of their misery, but suffering people are forced to stay alive and endure the pain, is inhumane. Legalizing euthanasia would be no more than an act of mercy allowing medical personnel to bring slow, painful deaths to a halt.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia not only gives the patient the opportunity to stop their suffering, it also gives them autonomy. According to Thomas Preston, professor of medicine, a retired cardiologist and a former board member of Compassion in Dying “society must protect the right of terminally ill patients to choose euthanasia.” (Euthanasia 53) By euthanasia being legal, we have been unconsciously giving the patient the autonomy of whether they want to continue living or not. We as human beings can only perceive the outside of a person, however, we could never really know what they may be going through or suffering. Sometimes, individuals are so self-centered that would prefer to have their loved ones alive and in pain than giving them the freedom to choose between life and death. After all, each person is the owner of his or her life and should be able to decide what is best for them.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to relieve suffering for those with terminal illness, physician assisted suicide should be legalized for competent persons to allow for autonomy in making end of life decisions. In order to reduce or relieve suffering of animals, medically assisted death is a perfectly acceptable practice today. But when it comes to people diagnosed with untreatable and deadly diseases, they are not afforded the same painless luxury. They are at the mercy of their disease and a medical community that fails to recognize a life without dignity is no life at all.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore physician assisted suicide should not be seen as the ending of someone’s life but instead be seen as the end of someone’s suffering and pain. As a person, one has the constitutional and moral right to over his or her body. If a person decides to die with dignity then rather have to go through months of misery. Then that is their choice. If a patient would want to spare their family of hospital debt. If the pain is too much for them to continue. Then that is their choice over their life. The terminally ill person’s decision should be respected just the same as the healthy person’s decision is…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been an act passed in each valid state called the “Death With Dignity." It is an act that gives a terminally ill patient the right to put their life to an end in a clean, quick, and dignified manner. Not only is it easing the process and emotional level for the patient it can put ease on the family. Even though no one ever would want to see their love one pass, no one would want to see their loved one suffer. Friends, family, and others can prepare for the death of the sufferer and can have better acceptance through the process knowing that he or she was not harmed or in any…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    EUTHANASIA

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    The overall purpose of the Euthanasia act it to allow those who are terminally ill to have to right to die on their own terms. Euthanasia is a drug that those who wish to die on their own terms are given in the formal of a pill. After receiving the pill, the patient then shallows the pill, ending their own life on their own terms. This concept of Euthanasia as caused a lot of controversy over the past couple of years. Specifically within the year of 2014, the act of Euthanasia has caught the attention of many, especially who of high position within our government. While this act of assisted suicide is illegal in many of our states today, some states such as Washington, Oregon, Montana, Vermont and New Mexico carry out his law off dying on your own terms. Many well known case of these issues of dying on your own terms such as Washington v. Glucksberg (1997), Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) Baxter v. Montana (2009). " Reflecting the religious and cultural diversity of the United States, there is a wide range of public opinion about euthanasia and the right-to-die movement in the United States. During the past 30 years, public research shows that views on euthanasia tend to correlate with religious affiliation and culture, though not gender." (CNN.COM) "The legislation of assisted suicide has moved a significant step closer after the Government made clear that it would not stand in the way of a change in the law.Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs and peers – including Coalition ministers – will be given a free vote on a Bill that would enable doctors to help terminally ill patients to die, The Telegraph can disclose.The proposed legislation will come before Parliament in the next few months. On Saturday night, Norman Lamb, a Liberal Democrat and the minister responsible for care for elderly and disabled people, was among the first to say he would vote in favor. Several other ministers and senior MPs and peers have previously signaled support for the move. Mr.…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is a complex and controversial topic in society today. Euthanasia is an action or omission to cause death. One topic that is hotly debated is physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is an act of commission by a willing patient and his or her doctor to end his or her life. I believe that physician-assisted suicide is justified in the terminally ill or those with incurable diseases as long as they’re deemed mentally capable of making that decision.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors around the world use euthanasia to end a patient's life when a doctor feels it's time to end a severely sick patient’s life. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a person suffering from pain physically or mentally, this practice is illegal in most countries. Doctor’s usually turn to assisted suicide when the patient’s body is refusing to get better and not taking any of the treatments in. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide should be legal in our country because if people want to die peacefully and calmly in the right way, they should. If a person is thinking about ending their life, assisted suicide is the more better option because the patient gets assistance from a doctor and it's in a more calm matter…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people who are diagnosed with incurable diseases want to be able to die gracefully and on their own terms but are not permitted to do so. Reasons like this are why assisted suicide should be legalized for people with incurable diseases. Euthanasia should be a right granted to all citizens who are suffering from a degenerative, fatal, or painful condition that would enable them to enjoy their lives as healthy people do. There is much controversy on this subject, and frankly, it should not be up for discussion. It is not up to society to make decisions that infringe upon the rights of the physically ill. Firstly, it would allow the ill to practice their rights, it would grant doctors the opportunity to do their primary job in society, which is helping people. Euthanasia would save money that could be better spent on other fields of medicine. Lastly, assisted suicide should be legal in order to give patients the ability to decide their own fate. Furthermore, having the option to physician assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation and to end life in an ethical and…

    • 4225 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some believe that dying is just the end of one life to get to the other one, others think our soul either goes to heaven or hell or simply other people may think that when you die you just die and there is nothing else beyond that; the truth is that none of us have a clue on what is going to happen when we die. Of course according to each person’s beliefs it will depend on what each think it will happen. Even though most of the people in the world are extremely terrified of death; someday either we want it or not it will happen, we don’t know when, we don’t know how, but someday we will die. It is our destiny to die, but there are some cases in which the decision between life or death is in the hands of another human being. It must be hard for the majority of people to take the hard decision on whether letting someone live for its own good or just letting that person die to let him rest in peace. Taking this decision is whether choosing if you carry forever this guilt on letting someone die when there is still hope or feeling guilty on letting someone suffer instead of letting them rest in peace. Sometimes we have to take hard and sad decisions for best even though it will affect everybody else, such as choosing between the life or death of someone.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics