From the article made by Dr. Maise M, a patient should have the liberty to choose induced death if he is suffering from an incurable disease where even the best treatment doesn’t improve his quality of life. She also said that euthanasia should be a natural extension of patient’s right’s allowing him to decide the value of life and death where in maintaining life support system against patient’s wish is considered unethical by law as well as medical philosophy.
According to Dr.Maise M, a doctor is expected to help treat dick by prescribing medicines that will relieve the patient’s suffering even if medications potentially give rise to serious side effects. This means dealing with distress should be the priority even it affects one’s life expectancy. While killing someone in an attempt to defend “self” is acceptable by law, mercy killing is seen as an act that is highly immoral in nature. The motive of euthanasia is to “aid-in-dying” painlessly and thus be considered positively by lawmakers. Also legalizing euthanasia would help alleviate suffering in terminally ill patients. It would be inhuman and unfair to make them endure the unbearable pain.
Based on the article by Dr. Maise M, family heirs who would misuse euthanasia as a tool for wealth inheritance. Reason being, the relatives can withdraw life support leading to early death of the said individual even in the absence of legalized euthanasia. Also, a health care expenditure is and will always be a concern for the family irrespective of the euthanasia laws and only those who can afford prolonged unproductive treatment will continue to do so.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…
- 2132 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is nearly impossible for the patient to rely on another person to make the best decision that they would have made for themselves, particularly when it involves personal interests such as profiting from a will. If there is something to gain, the family members’ motives seem questionable. If the patient falls ill, then there lies a possibility that their heirs will hope for the patient’s death so that they could receive their inheritance. The inability to confirm whether the family actually has the patient’s best interest in mind supports the argument that any form of euthanasia is unethical. Moreover, some families may not have the opportunity to drop everything in order to take on the responsibility of their sick loved one. This causes added stress to the family and can lead to the desire to resolve the issue by forcing the idea of euthanasia on to the loved one. Also, health care costs for terminally ill patients, including nursing homes, prescription drugs, and home health care deserves consideration. According to Time.com, one in every four Medicare dollars spent goes to the five percent of beneficiaries in the last year of their life. The result of this is often overwhelming debt for the families of terminally ill patients, with the care of a single patient costing approximately $39,000 exceeding the financial assets for many households. When the patient is uninsured or denied coverage from an insurance company, the family inherits the costs. In cases like these, legalizing euthanasia would present it as a viable solution, and in their distress, the family members may selfishly consider it to alleviate the financial burden the patient may…
- 1537 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1,672). A huge theme that society has seen in regards to euthanasia is the physician’s role. Physicians have been seen as murderers for assisting the death of their patients and they have been referred to as mercy-killers. However, many people tend to disregard the fact that even the physician, who is usually the one being blamed, can actually be the victim as well. According to the American Medical Association’s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, it was stated that “although life-prolonging medical treatment may be withheld, the physician should not intentionally cause death” (as cited in Dickinson, Clark, Winslow & Marples, 2005, p. 44). In a study mentioned by Dickinson et al. (2005) it was found that when physicians were asked about whether or not active voluntary euthanasia (AVE) should be legalized, the percentage of those who were in favor of was between 35% and 71% (p.…
- 2102 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Whether financially or emotionally, prolonged dying can prove incredibly detrimental to all of those involved. In a study conducted in 2000, 89% of patients said not being a burden to family was a very important consideration (Chantagul, Ho, 254). Typically very costly, medical treatment can financially cripple a family. A patient might rationalize euthanization but saying his death serves a greater good for his loved ones. A patient nearing death might also think it is better for him to die than have his family be so emotionally taxed by procedures prolonging the dying process. Euthanasia can offer a relief to a patient worried about causing his loved ones to suffer, giving the patient more peace in death.…
- 1545 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the United States, active euthanasia is currently banned, with the exception of the state of Oregon. “Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act (DWDA), which was enacted in late 1997, allows terminally-ill adult Oregonians to obtain and use prescriptions from their physicians for self-administered, lethal doses of medications” (Death With Dignity Act). It would appear to be an easy assumption that most people in the United States believe that ending the life of a human being who is alert and able to communicate is morally wrong, though most likely is suffering and experiencing a lesser quality of life because of that; for example, a patient who is suffering from a terminally ill disease like Lou Gehrig’s disease, cancer and multiple sclerosis. With a closer examination of the facts, however, might lead to an extreme change in the opinions of even the strongest supporters of anti-euthanasia.…
- 1807 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Euthanasia should be legalized to allow terminally ill patients the opportunity to prepare for their deaths, avoid unnecessary pain and die with dignity. Euthanasia is “the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.” (Am. Heritage) The literal meaning of the word euthanasia, "‘an easy or happy death,’ from the Greek word eu- ‘good’, and thanatos ‘death’"(Harper), is proof in itself that the whole idea is to help people and not to belittle the value of life. The fact that suffering animals can be put out of their misery, but suffering people are forced to stay alive and endure the pain, is inhumane. Legalizing euthanasia would be no more than an act of mercy allowing medical personnel to bring slow, painful deaths to a halt.…
- 985 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Argument over Euthanasia I. What is euthanasia? A. ¡§good death¡¨- greek B. intentional termination of life by another by explicit request of person who dies C. euthanasia has many meanings due to moral/ethincal/religious terms-mass confusion II. Different forms of euthanasia A. passive euthanasia- speeding up death of person by withdrawing some form of life support & letting nature take its course 1. remove life support equipment 2. stopping medical procedures, medications, etc. 3. stopping water & food supply 4. not delivering CPR 5. most common- giving morphine to patient to control pain but causing a sooner death (given to people who are terminally ill or in a vegetative state) B. active euthanasia-…
- 341 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Doctors around the world use euthanasia to end a patient's life when a doctor feels it's time to end a severely sick patient’s life. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a person suffering from pain physically or mentally, this practice is illegal in most countries. Doctor’s usually turn to assisted suicide when the patient’s body is refusing to get better and not taking any of the treatments in. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide should be legal in our country because if people want to die peacefully and calmly in the right way, they should. If a person is thinking about ending their life, assisted suicide is the more better option because the patient gets assistance from a doctor and it's in a more calm matter…
- 1327 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…
- 1169 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Many people who are diagnosed with incurable diseases want to be able to die gracefully and on their own terms but are not permitted to do so. Reasons like this are why assisted suicide should be legalized for people with incurable diseases. Euthanasia should be a right granted to all citizens who are suffering from a degenerative, fatal, or painful condition that would enable them to enjoy their lives as healthy people do. There is much controversy on this subject, and frankly, it should not be up for discussion. It is not up to society to make decisions that infringe upon the rights of the physically ill. Firstly, it would allow the ill to practice their rights, it would grant doctors the opportunity to do their primary job in society, which is helping people. Euthanasia would save money that could be better spent on other fields of medicine. Lastly, assisted suicide should be legal in order to give patients the ability to decide their own fate. Furthermore, having the option to physician assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation and to end life in an ethical and…
- 4225 Words
- 17 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Euthanasia is a complex and controversial topic in society today. Euthanasia is an action or omission to cause death. One topic that is hotly debated is physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is an act of commission by a willing patient and his or her doctor to end his or her life. I believe that physician-assisted suicide is justified in the terminally ill or those with incurable diseases as long as they’re deemed mentally capable of making that decision.…
- 772 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When a sick or elderly patient asks for euthanasia, it can sometimes be caused by psychological and emotional pressures. The opposition to euthanasia does not mean that people insist on medical treatment at all costs. Good medical practice is the alternative to euthanasia. Sometimes a difference is made between active euthanasia (e.g. giving a lethal injection) and positive euthanasia (withdrawing treatment). It is misleading to describe withholding or discontinuing treatment as ‘euthanasia unless it is done with the intention of killing the patient. This debate happens all the time even when it’s not publicized.…
- 465 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The controversial topic of euthanasia is highly debated throughout the globe on a variety of different levels. The best…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit.” People all over the world, suffer from painful diseases and illnesses and become desperate for assisted suicide. There are two types of euthanasia. The first is voluntary euthanasia, is when the person who is killed has requested to be killed. The second type is involuntary euthanasia. This occurs when “euthanasia is performed on a person who is able to provide informed consent, but does not, either because they do not choose to die or because they were not asked.” It is our decision whether we want to live or die, or how long we want to live or die, therefore voluntary euthanasia is appropriate, for somebody who is suffering…
- 1240 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays