Preview

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
In Act 3 Scene of Juilius Caesar . Brutus and some of his conspirators have killed Caesar and now Brutus explain why he did this to the people of Rome . Brutus use ethos, pathos, logos to defend himself .
In Paragraph 1 Brutus uses the three appeals ethos, pathos, logos to make an argument about what made him kill, why it was a logical idea and what gave him the power to kill Caesar and that why everyone should believe him.Brutus used the appeal of ethos when he say’s "believe me for my honor, have respect for mine honor” which is his way of saying trust me because I am an honorable man. You wouldn’t think an honorable man would lie to you. Brutus used the appeal of pathos when he appeared to the emotions of the crowd by saying “ Why Brutus rose against Caesar , this is my answer - Not that I loved Caesar less , but that I loved Rome more “ “ I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need
…show more content…
Using ethos is an advantage because we trust someone that is friends with another person to be a good judge of their friend's character.Using logos is easy because everything makes sense and it’s factual so it’s easy for everyone to understand why something is a correct reason for doing an action.I think the disadvantages of using pathos is that sometimes you shouldn’t use your emotions to reason. Using ethos is a disadvantage because there will always be somebody more credible or someone that more authority than you, some people don’t respect authority. Using logos is a disadvantage because sometimes logic will be too cold and a difficult way of persuading a person you need to tap into the human emotional side to them not the logical cerebral side of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After I read this article, I understand the effects of logos, pathos, and ethos. I think these three rhetorical ideas are mainly pursuing the artistry of the articles or essay. For example, Pathos is the emotional appeal of the characters. The writer would write about "When someone was feeling sympathy about homeless, they would give food or money to them instead of ignoring them. " At the mean time of the readers, they can feel the compassion of the characters, and they would imagining themselves into the moment…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethos is our level of credibility as perceived by the audience. Pathos is the quality of a persuasive presentation which appeals to the emotions of the audience. An emotional connection can be created in many ways by a speaker, perhaps most notably by stories. The goal of a story, anecdote, analogy, simile, and metaphor is often to link an aspect of our primary message with a triggered emotional response from the audience. Logos is synonymous with a logical argument. The message we are trying to convey should be based on facts, statistics, and…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While reading The Burning of Rome, any person with simple observation skill may perceive Tacitus’ purpose. The readers should take what he says against Nero, and try to believe everything he says so they turn against Nero. Tacitus believes the readers should think that Nero started the fire that engulfed Tome. He wants reader to think of Nero as a corrupt, manipulative human being, and overall the worst, most evil leader that ever ruled over Rome. Tacitus uses the rhetorical strategies of pathos, description, and narration as ways to help him persuade readers to believe his point.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Antony's speech, he talks about the bad things that Caesar has done and how Brutus was ambitious. It says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it." (III.ii.75-78) Which is a logo because it is a logic on how Caesar and Brutus are both ambitious. It also says, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man. He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill." (III.ii.84-87) Which means that Brutus is an straightforward man by reason of him brought captives home. Antony is speaking satisfactory about Brutus so the people would listen to Antony more effectively because of the nice things he is saying.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scheming, manipulation, and backstabbing are common in almost every society in this day and age. As seen on many occasions in Julius Caesar, the conspirators spend a lot of the play plotting against Caesar,because they fear what he might do if he comes to power. Brutus is portrayed as the tragic hero, and he gives numerous speeches to convey his opinions and feelings about the subject matter. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Marcus Brutus makes many appeals to rhetoric, specifically ethos and pathos, in order to get his point across to the audience.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be able to correctly utilize pathos, you should use rich metaphors, match your vocal delivery to the emotion, tell stories, use descriptive words, and use sensory words. “ If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less but that I loved Rome more.”(3.2.21-24) Brutus is directly appealing to the plebeians’ morals, more importantly their sense of patriotism. You can clearly see that Brutus wanted to address each plebeians’ love for their city. You can clearly see that each plebeian cares deeply about their city because then they wouldn’t be at Caesar’s funeral trying to figure how their emperor died. Brutus is also attempting to receive empathy from the plebeians , basically saying that he didn't kill Caesar because he was jealous or utterly dislike of Caesar but because he was concerned more about Rome’s future. His main objective with this statement was to make the plebeians feel loved so they wouldn’t be angered with him and understand his side of the…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony uses all three of the persuasive appeals to convince people to one side of an argument or another. However, the most common appeal used by Antony is logos. This can be seen when he talks at Julius Caesar’s funeral, when he convinces Brutus and Cassius not to kill him after Caesar’s death, and when he asks if anyone else would leave their estate to the Romans like Caesar did.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Brutus uses pathos is very strong. Brutus says how much he loved Caesar but he had to murder him for the better of Rome. Brutus said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Also, Brutus shows his sympathy over Caesar’s death. Brutus said, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant; I honor him: but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” Brutus…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3,101-102). In this line he is asking the audience why should they applaud Brutus for killing Caesar. They had loved and admired Caesar at some point so why should they not mourn him now.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death of Caesar caused the citizens’ of Rome to really question whose side they agree on. They were torn between Brutus’s and Mark Antony’s eulogy. When Brutus made his speech he often used the ethos and logos to convince the romans into believing killing Caesar was for the benefit of the roman people. When Brutus said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” -22 He was appealing to ethos because he was proving that his did what was right for the country.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus’ speech handled emotional and ethics appeal better. He said throughout his speech how he weeps for Caesar and how he honored him. He uses ethics to try to persuade the crowd that he loved Rome more than he loved Caesar. Brutus also uses reasoning to let the crowd know that Caesar was valiant, fortunate, and that he killed him. Brutus’ uses of ethical appeals in his speech were strong. He used the word honor several times in his speech to try to get the crowd to think that is the most important quality in a person. He also uses ethics to say how anyone who disagrees with Caesar’s death hates Rome as well.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brutus's speech becomes one of acquittal, not only for the people of Rome, but for Brutus himself. He uses his "honor and nobility" as a shield to defend and justify his actions to the crowd. Brutus states that he has carried out this horrendous act because of his love for Rome, and for the good of the people. "This is my answer, not that I have loved Caesar less, but that I love Rome more..." (3.2.21-22). In his speech he requests that the people use their "reason" to judge him. Although this seduces the crowd, it is not until after one of the common…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays