Preview

Ethnocentrism and Group Realities

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4728 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethnocentrism and Group Realities
The Evolution of Ethnocentrism
ROSS A. HAMMOND
Department of Political Science
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

ROBERT AXELROD
Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Ethnocentrism is a nearly universal syndrome of attitudes and behaviors, typically including in-group favoritism. Empirical evidence suggests that a predisposition to favor in-groups can be easily triggered by even arbitrary group distinctions and that preferential cooperation within groups occurs even when it is individually costly. The authors study the emergence and robustness of ethnocentric behaviors of in-group favoritism, using an agent-based evolutionary model. They show that such behaviors can become widespread under a broad range of conditions and can support very high levels of cooperation, even in onemove prisoner’s dilemma games. When cooperation is especially costly to individuals, the authors show how ethnocentrism itself can be necessary to sustain cooperation.
Keywords: in-group favoritism; ethnocentrism; agent-based models; evolutionary models; contingent cooperation Ethnocentrism is a nearly universal syndrome of discriminatory attitudes and behaviors (Sumner 1906; LeVine and Campbell 1972). The attitudes include seeing one’s own group (the in-group) as virtuous and superior, one’s own standards of value as universal, and out-groups as contemptible and inferior. Behaviors associated with ethnocentrism include cooperative relations within the group and the absence of cooperative relations with out-groups (LeVine and Campbell 1972). Ethnocentric behaviors are based on group boundaries that are typically defined by one or more observable characteristics (such as language, accent, physical features, or religion) regarded as indicating common descent (Sumner 1906; Hirschfeld 1996; Kurzban, Tooby, and
Cosmides 2001). Such behaviors often also have a strong territorial component
(Sumner 1906). Ethnocentrism has been implicated not



References: Alford, John R., Carolyn L. Funk, and John R. Hibbing. 2005. Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review 99 (2): 153-67. Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books. ———. 1986. An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review 80:1095-1111. Axelrod, Robert, and William D. Hamilton. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390-6. Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Brewer, Marilynn B. 1979. The role of ethnocentrism in intergroup conflict. In The psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Brewer, Marilynn B., and Roderick M. Kramer. 1986. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing Brown, Donald E. 2004. Human universals, human nature, and human culture. Daedalus 133 (4): 47-54. Cashdan, Elizabeth. 2001. Ethnocentrism and xenophobia: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology 42:760-5. Chirot, Daniel, and Martin E. P. Seligman. 2001. Ethno political warfare: Causes, consequences, and possible solutions. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The selfish gene: New edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Dovidio, Jack F., and Samuel L. Gaertner. 1993. Stereotypes and evaluative intergroup bias. In Affect, cognition and bias, edited by D Ferguson, C. K., and H. H. Kelley. 1964. Significant factors in over-evaluation of own-group’s product. Hamilton, William D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour: I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1-52. Hammond, Ross A., and Robert Axelrod. 2006. Evolution of contingent altruism when cooperation is expensive Hardin, Russell. 2002. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Hechter, Michael, and Karl-Dieter Opp. 2001. Social norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Hewstone, Miles, Mark Rubin, and Hazel Willis. 2002. Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology 53:575-604. Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. 1996. Race in the making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kinder, Donald R. 1998. Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Handbook of social psychology, edited by Daniel T Klein, Jill, and Richard Ettenson. 1999. Consumer animosity and consumer ethnocentrism: An analysis of unique antecedents Kramer, Roderick M., and Marilynn B. Brewer. 1984. Effects of group identity on resource utilization in a simulated common dilemma Kurzban, Robert, John Tooby, and Leda Cosmides. 2001. Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization Lacy, Robert C., and Paul W. Sherman. 1983. Kin recognition by phenotype matching. American Naturalist 121:489-512. Lamont, Michele A., and Virag Molnar. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28:167-95. LeVine, Robert A., and Donald T. Campbell. 1972. Ethnocentrism. New York: John Wiley. Lichbach, Mark I. 1996. The cooperator’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Molander, Per. 1985. The optimal level of generosity in a selfish, uncertain environment. Journal of Conflict Resolution 29:611-8. Nowak, Martin A., and Karl Sigmund. 1998. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393:573-7. Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review 92:1-22. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster. Rabushka, Alvin, and Kenneth Shepsle. 1972. Politics in plural societies: A theory of democratic instability. Columbus, OH: Merrill. Ray, John J., and F. H. Lovejoy. 1986. The generality of racial prejudice. Journal of Social Psychology 126:563-4. Riolo, Rick L., Michael D. Cohen, and Robert Axelrod. 2001. Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature 414:441-3. Roosens, Eugene E. 1989. Creating ethnicity: The process of ethnogenesis (Frontiers of Anthropology, Vol Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Sherif, Muzafer. 1966. Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Sherif, Muzafer, and Carolyn W. Sherif. 1956. Groups in harmony and tension. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Harper. Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. New York: Free Press. Simon, Herbert. 1990. A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science 50:1665-8. Sober, Elliot, and David S. Wilson. 1998. Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Spence, A. Michael, and Richard Zeckhauser. 1971. Insurance, information, and individual action. Struch, Naomi, and Shalom H. Schwartz. 1989. Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias Sumner, William G. 1906. Folkways. Boston: Ginn. Tajfel, Henri. 1970. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American 223:96-102. Tajfel, Henri, Michael G. Billig, R. P. Bundy, and C. Flament. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behavior Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell. Trivers, Robert L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35-57. van der Dennen, J. M. G. 1995. The origin of war. Groningen, Netherlands: Origin Press. Wrangham, Richard. 2004. Killer species. Daedalus 133 (4): 25-35. Wu, Jianzhong, and Robert Axelrod. 1995. How to cope with noise in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    MPS4 Fall 2014

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    E. Does the model of reciprocity depend on shared genes between the altruist and the recipient?…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethnocentrism is defined as the tendency to judge other groups, societies or lifestyles by the standard of one's own culture (Healy, 1999, p. 175). At some level, ethnocentrism is a necessary part of human culture. Without it, people would tend to not obey laws, social norms or work with others in every day life. Ethnocentrism can also create a negative effect. At the extreme end of it, it can create the view that other cultures are not only different, but are also inferior. When ethnocentrism exists at any level, most people follow group lines and tend to differentiate between "us" and "them" (Healy, 1999, p. 175)…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Singelis, T.M. (2000). Some Thoughts on the Future of Cross-Cultural Social Psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 76-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002202210031001007…

    • 1299 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    America has always been an extremely patriotic nation. The manner in which we became a nation is a source of pride for many Americans. We fought for our freedom in the Revolutionary War, after courageously standing up to the tyrannical British government. Over the years, we have triumphed over many social injustices and have finally created a democratic nation in which all are free and equal. That history is reflected in all of us, in our laws, customs and attitudes. Most American children are taught very young that they are lucky to be Americans, and are raised to learn the reasons why they should be very proud of that fact.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    d. To understand the categories of nationality, tribe, race, and religion as they relate to ethnicity.…

    • 4936 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Observation Project

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Bibliography: Batson, Daniel C. "Altruism and Prosocial Behavior." In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN: 0195213769.…

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diversity Worksheet

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Groups of people are identified by race, political view, culture, pay scale and religious beliefs. Any of these groups can have a variation of different races and cultures.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Brown, L. D. (1978). Toward a Theory of Power and Intergroup Relations. In C. L. Cooper and C. P. Alderfer (Eds.), Advances in Experiential Social Processes, Vol. 1. (pp. 161-180). New York: Wiley.…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Turner, J.C. Hogg, M.A. Oakes , P.J. Reicher, S.D. and Wehterell, M.S. (1987) Rediscovering the Social group: A Self-Categorisation Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.…

    • 2293 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the large issue of discrimination in ethnic groups and minorities is still a large issue in the world. Conducting this experiment it was important to find value and interview others of a different ethnicity or race to show respect and sympathize with other’s experiences in relation to their ethnicity or racial identity. These issues have extremely high value to study based specifically on the fact that studying race and ethnicity prepares individuals to further understand someone of a multi-racial background. The world is constantly becoming more aware of those with a different race or ethnicity. Having the ability to be more aware of individuals having multi-racial backgrounds, will better shape everyday society. In reality, discrimination in the world is still a huge issue and many people may not experience discrimination at all and others do quite often. The overall discovery conducting these two interviews, was that stereotyping and discrimination relates to various issues of gender, the process behind identification of ethnicity and generally being a minority or a dominant group of a place can change a person of a multiethnic backgrounds life in order to adapt or assimilate into a certain culture.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethnocentrism is prevalent in today's world, even in the diverse environment of the United States. However, this diversity may actually cause ethnocentrism as new immigrants enter the country while still holding on to the nationalism…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, ethnocentrism has been the cause of many wars, riots, and hate crimes, and is the basis by which racism is formed. For this reason, it is important to study in regards to history. From example in the past and present, we can see that it is a significant topic. From the persecution of Christians and Jews in the earliest Bible times, to today as Muslim extremists target Americans, ethnocentrism is a part of us and affects everybody.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall…

    • 6073 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethnocentrism is where people believe that they are better than others in an ethnic group, but it can also develop from racial or religious differences. This can cause problem by leading to false opinions about different cultures, maybe causing communication problems.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jones 2002

    • 7183 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Simon, H. A. (1990). ‘A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism,’ Science 250: 1665^…

    • 7183 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays