Preview

Ethics In Charlie Gordon's Flowers For Algernon

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
315 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics In Charlie Gordon's Flowers For Algernon
In 'Flowers for Algernon", Charlie Gordon's doctor's did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter. Ethically means that ethics, are sharing's, lessons, and meet ups. They all share towards your behavior, places, things, people, and goals towards getting something right, done, or fixed. Charlie Gordan is not the smartest person you know. Charlies is 37 with a IQ of 24, that levels to a 2nd grader. Charlie now acts like a 2nd grader, plays like a 2nd grader, also talks like a 2nd grader. Charlie got offered to get a surgery that would make him smart.
Some argue that it was a good thing that Charlie got the surgery because he got a 'chance' to be smart. When the doctors performed the surgery they did not take

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the operation, Charlie began to go through a regression. Before the operation he was smarter than he is now that he regrets. “I did a dumb thing today I for got I wasnt in Miss Kinnians class at the adult centen any more like I use to be”(Keyes 243). His regression was so awful that his I.Q decrees to 68. So it was an awful idea…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keys, Charlie Gordon is 37 years old and has an IQ of 68. He has a longing dream to be smart. His doctors, Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur, did not act ethically when they preformed a surgery to make him smarter. Acting ethically is when one may choose to do is right or wrong. They didn’t think through the endless possibilities of how the procedure could turnout and didn’t effectively care for Charlie after his surgery. Some people however, believe that the doctors were both thinking ethically with their decisions. Due to my evidence, they doctors didn't act like they should have.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man with an IQ of around 68. For his whole life, he has only wanted to be "smart" like everyone else. Charlie has two doctors named Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur. The doctor's want to use Charlie as a test subject to test out a surgery to increase the Human IQ. Ethics are if you really did the "right" thing, so Charlie's doctor's did not act ethically when performing the surgery on Charlie. They had not kept their choices opinion free, they had not put Charlie's social life over science, and they didn't inform Charlie of the potential risks and side effects of the surgery.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlie showed us that the surgery was a failure and extremely risky for something that's not going to work anyways. Because of the surgery, Charlie lost his job, his friends and most importantly, it was useless and wasn’t even permanent. Going through that much at once must have been a lot for a him and his friends. Now, knowing what things could happen, if you were in Charlie's place would you take the Artificial Intelligence…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon Argument

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlie Gordon's doctors didn't act ethically when they preformed the surgery on him to make him smarter.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie’s actions are important because they reveal how we can make irrational decisions without knowing the dangers. Charlie was definitely being brave in choosing to do his surgery, for an act to be courageous, it must involve extreme risk or danger, but it should not be for a personal gain, it should be moral. Charlie agreed to do the surgery, but only because it was going to help him become intelligent. Sure, it would’ve helped his doctors improve the procedure for future trials. But, that doesn’t mean they are helping save someone’s life, they are only improving it temporarily. Earlier in the Flowers for Algernon movie, Charlie reveals how foolish and not courageous his actions were when he tried to use the mixer (in the factory he worked at), without proper training. For an act to be courageous, it must not be irrational. The equipment was dangerous, and Charlie could’ve gotten hurt. Later in the Flowers for Algernon movie, Charlie revealed how selfish he was when he stood up against Dr. Strauss in Chicago. It’s understandable that Charlie was standing up for himself, but he embarrassed Dr. Strauss even after all he had done for him. Charlie was acting like the sun, wanting planets (or everyone and everything) to revolve around…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctors lead Charlie blindly, but willingly, into the surgery, using him for research. Charlie knew not what his new found knowledge would bring him; despair, doubt, dread. He knew of the doctor’s ignorance to his feelings and human status, and of the surgery ultimately failing. Due to the devastating events that would transpire, Charlie should have refrained from undergoing the…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, a specific story can include more than one theme. Take my choice of story for example. My story, “Flowers for Algernon,” has multiple themes that could fit with it. I believe the most appropriate theme for “Flowers for Algernon” is that too much of a good thing can end up being bad.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do we have a code of ethics in the medical profession? We as health care professionals need to understand our morals and ethical standards. “Ethics are internal to oneself; values, beliefs, and individual interpretation.” Guido (2010). The physician in this study has decided on his own that there has been no wrong doing…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    flowers for algernon

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another reason why he should not get the operation is his friends. Now that he has a higher intelligent, he can see the true side of his friends. (Keyes, 209)Before Charlie gets smarter, his friends had used him for entertainment. They had given him alcohol, and they had used him like a tool. They told him to show his job of cleaning toilets to girls. “Charlie is a card when he is potted,” said Joe. (Keyes, 206) They also have ditched him when he went out to buy a newspaper and coffee for Joe and Frank. Frank said, “I ain’t laughed so much since we sent…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, when he saw life differently, it was in a bad way, and he then realised he didn’t have any friends. According to the text, Charlie said, “ It’s a funny thing I never knew that Joe and Frank and the others like to have me. Now I know what it means to pull a Charlie Gordon. I’m ashamed.” (Keyes 231). Readers might also argue that the surgery was a good idea because, he remembered his childhood. However, when he remembered his past he felt very abandoned. For example, as his parents said, “ He’s got to be sent away. I don’t want him in the house any more…” If you had the offer for this surgery, and saw the emotionally inhuman pain it causes, wouldn’t you say…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Healthcare is a diverse field with many specialties, but a commonality in all aspects is provider’s ethics. Ethics means following the standards and guidelines set by institutions as it relates to job duties, professional behavior, and patients. The decisions made by healthcare professionals, be it physicians, nurses or medical staff, affect real people and may mean the difference between life and death. The health and welfare of patients, along with the very serious aspect of treatment facilitation, requires that ethical standards be followed every step of the way for the health care professional.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter. This is because the doctors didn’t inform Charlie of all the information that they should have, and they did not follow the "Five Steps to Better Ethical Decision Making." Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur could have slowed down their experiment to get the best results and avoid problems. Overall, the doctors could have made a lot of better decisions that could have prevented many bad things, but considering the time period, a few of their decisions could have been…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    132). Living ethics on a daily basis and instilling ethical behaviors in yourself and those around you allow for the body and mind to not have to have deep thought in these situations but, allow for muscle memory to take over. Making these decisions involves removing uncertainty which builds patient and staff confidence (Garrett, Baillie, McGeehan, and Garrett, 2010, pg. 12). Communication with staff members regarding ethical decision making and empowering any member to call a “knock off” should they feel a situation or decision is unethical is important for a symbiotic working relationship. This improved open communication between medical staff will improve customer satisfaction and employee…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    about whether or not you believe Charlie should have had the operation and then you must persuade your reader to agree…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays