Running Head: Ethics and Contracting
Ethics and Contracts
October 23, 2011
The question, “Does Business and Ethics Still Exist?” has generally caused honest business owners and also government agencies to ponder this notion. Even though the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is established in order to prevent unethical practices by contractors and government agencies failing to abide by this regulation, does not mean everyone it pertains to will adhere. Within this paper, I will present researched instances of unethical actions related to federal contracting that present ethics and contracting as negative representation. In addition, I will also recommend corrective actions for the unethical acts I have presented citing the appropriate FAR or federal regulated guideline related to the recommended guideline to support.
As previously stated within the Abstract section of this paper, the question, “Does Business and Ethics Still Exist?” has generally caused honest business owners and also government agencies to ponder this notion. Even though the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is established in order to prevent unethical practices by contractors and government agencies failing to abide by this regulation, does not mean everyone it pertains to will adhere? The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), is the principal set of rules in the Federal Acquisition Regulation System. This system consists of sets of regulations issued by agencies of the Federal government of the United States to govern what is called the "acquisition process"; this is the process through which the government purchases ("acquires") goods and services. That process consists of three phases: (1) need recognition and acquisition planning, (2) contract formation, and (3) contract administration. The FAR System regulates the activities of government personnel in carrying out that process. It does not regulate the purchasing activities of private sector firms, except to the extent that parts of it are incorporated into government solicitations and contracts by reference (acquisition.gov). In a peer reviewed journal review entitled, “Is Business Ethics Getting Better? A Historical Perspective” by Joanne B. Ciulla, does in fact address the question stated. The article draws close attention to that very question in order to discuss the importance of history in understanding business and ethics. Ciulla focuses on “history” as the example to show this type of bad judgment has been around for a long time and how several individuals have tried to prevent it, for example, it describes early attempts at the Harvard Business School to use business history as a means of teaching students about moral and social values. In the end, the author suggests that history may be another way to teach ethics, enrich business ethics courses, and develop the perspective and vision in future business leaders (2010).
Subpart 3.10: Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct is considered rules and regulations method used to filter any persons whom do not abide by Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR). What does this mean for contractor business transitions- between contractor and government? The article, “Ethics Issues Involving Contractors in the Federal Workplace “drafted by, Kenneth White, DoD Standards of Conduct Office, presents incidents that do not operate under the Federal Acquisitions Regulars, nor are they being filtered by the Subpart 3.10: Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct. The article presents several unethical practices such as, gifting, training, time management, misuse of position/endorsement, and charitable fundraising, but I would like to focus on training and how unethical motions between contractor and government can cause unethical practices. White tells us within his article that Government-provided and “All Hands” training is when the Government contracts for a service,...
Cited: Cuillla, J. B. (2011). Is Business Ethics Getting Better? A Historical Perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 335-343. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Roberts, R. N. (2010). MANDATORY CONTRACTOR CODES OF ETHICS AND DEFENSE PROCUREMENT INTEGRITY. Journal of Public Procurement, 10(2), 247-274. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Subpart 3.10 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct. (2011). Subpart 3.10 Contractor Code. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from https://www.acquisition.gov/far/current/html/Subpart%203_10.html
The Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2011). FAR. Retrieved October 19, 2011, from https://www.acquisition.gov/far/
White, Kenneth. Ethics Issues Involving Contractors in the Federal Workplace. (2006). Retrieved October 19, 2011, from http://www.dod.mil/dodgc/
Please join StudyMode to read the full document