“Cecil the Lion Killed By American Dentist” was the headline that rekindled the controversial debate over trophy hunting. This debate is better represented by Goodwell Nzou’s article “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” than in the passage by Alexis Crosswell “5 Reasons Why Trophy Hunting is Not Conservation.” Trophy hunting is the killing of animals specifically for the purpose of keeping a portion of the animal as a prize. Since the death of Cecil the Lion, the sport has come under significant fire from the media and sparked heated argument. Nzou has the stronger argument than Crosswell’s specifically because: it recognizes that humans personify deadly animals, the writer of “In Zimbabwe We Don’t Cry For Lions” has personal experience with the subject and that Goodwell Nzou explains that American priorities are more concerned with animals than starving people.…
Lions. The majestic kings of the jungle. Born and raised in Africa? Wouldn’t it be a shame if, such magnificent creatures were hunted? Well that's what happened to Cecil the lion. Cecil may have been one of the world's most famous and popular lions at Hwange National Park in Africa. He was lured out of a protected National Park then killed by Walter Palmer, a recreational big-game hunter with a crossbow. His death infuriated the whole world, now, everyone wants justice. Big game hunting is a huge problem in the Eastern hemisphere and around the world; therefore more things should be done to protect big game from trophy hunters. The money they pay to go hunting is outrageous, but the same amount of money can be earned from tourists viewing…
Personally, I think that the morality of hunting depends on the situation. If the hunter is strictly doing his job of providing food for his family and community, then that is fine. However, if they are doing it for the thrill and for pleasure and they aren't even going to eat what they kill, then these people need to take a moment to step back and realize that what they are doing is in no way right and they are the people giving genuine hunters a poor…
When it comes to deer hunting a huge factor in success or failure is the land being hunted on. You could drive around and knock on doors of farmhouses to ask permission to hunt the land, but other possibilities would be to enter into a deer hunting lease through an outfitter or deer hunt club. Just imagine that in the states of Iowa, Kansas and Missouri alone, more than 200,000 acres of private land are available for deer hunting so gaining access to this land would increase the possibility of getting a trophy deer. Today, many landowners are creating an opportunity for deer hunters to use their land without the need to knock on doors to get permission.…
Why are people likely to break hunting laws, whereas the people with the license are the ones that suffer? Over the years people have violated hunting laws. There has been little research for motivations for poaching. Illegal taking of wildlife is a serious problem in today’s society. Questions such as these prompted are discussed in the two following articles: “Illegal Hunting and Angling the Neutralization of Wildlife,” by Stephen L. Eliason, and an article by Bob Hood “Rules of the Game.” At first it may appear that only way these two writers might meet in common ground would be in a head on collision. Nevertheless after reading their articles more carefully, one can realize that Eliason and Hood are actually saying two different things.…
“Many of the animals are so tame that people can walk right up to them. They have no chance.” States Lena Masr. These animals have been have been raised around people knowing nothing about getting shot, so when they actually trust someone the trust gets taken away along with the animals lives. If exotic hunting were to be a thing it should at least be in Africa where the animals can run and attempt to get away from killed and/ or harmed. Lara Logan states “A Texas hunting ranch is not the same as being in a reserve in Sagal.” ”The future for Oryx’s is Africa… not Texas.” Hunters waste so much money paying to hunt animals, however if people were to hunt they should be hunting in Africa where the animals can run away rather than being trapped in a cage. If anything hunting a caged animal is pointless, “People who kill them are cowardly.” Exclaims Lena Mesri, hunting these animals or any animals in general is pointless unless it is for survival purposes or any other logical…
It’s important to recognize how much of this goes on because animals play an important role in our world. To make them suffer even more than they already have to is outrageous. “Inhumane Suffering One of the most controversial aspects of hunting is the prospect that an animal may be suffering from a long and painful death,” one article says while talking about this specific issue. It comes to show that animals are greatly affected when hunters kill them. Another article heavily discusses Cecil’s death saying, “the killing of Cecil has sparked an international outcry and a backlash against big game trophy hunting.” Cecil was a lion in Zimbabwe who was the hot topic for his death and is the perfect example of the suffering of animals because he was one of many animals who experienced a death from this…
The activity of hunting wild animals for food has long been a practice of man. It is what we as humans survived off for thousands of years. An instinctual need to pursue game is still alive in many of us. Unfortunately, those who choose to fulfill this instinct are generally condemned for their actions. Now this may not seem to be such a serious deal, but I assure you there is much more to this situation than first meets the eye. The topic of hunting is very significant because it not only affects hunter’s rights, but it affects landscape, funding wildlife preservation, and tradition.…
Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. What the author fails to consider is that most people that hunt are not hunting to just kill most are trying to feed there family or put meat in there fridge. According to peta the delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Although this may be true the ecosystem is going to kill off populations a lot slower than kill animals such as deer are self, killing isn't bad if you using the deer for good causes.On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in “canned hunts.” This is true, but people that go out and hunt in canned hunts usually after they kill a deer they give the meat to share your harvest and help families in need.…
Trophy hunters think killing these big, dangerous animals keeps us safe. Many animals don’t even want to go by humans because they are scared. Most animals will only eat humans when the humans are bleeding and weak. There is a fine line between humans and wild animals. Wild animals will not cross humans territory to harm us, if they are hungry they will eat the animals around…
Hunters should hunt for food, not just for the thrill of it. The number of animals in the world has declined by 95 percent in the last century. Some hunters kill just for fun. Hunting for fun is different than hunting for food. If a person is doing it for fun it is just killing an animal that did not do anything to them. Some animals that are extinct are tigers, rare leopards, deer, and a lot of other animals . Hunting just for trophies is wrong. when you hunt you should hunt for food, not just for the trophies or money. There needs to be more protection of endangered animals in Africa from foreign hunters.…
Since the beginning of time hunting has supported mankind. It has shaped our many cultures and woven many different spiritual beliefs. The first Americans that crossed the Bering Strait were nomadic hunters in pursuit of game. Native American Indian tribes relied strongly on hunting not only for food but they used animals parts for knives, bowstrings, and clothing. The early Europeans hunted for the same reasons, as did early peoples from across the globe. People even fought each other over hunting grounds. When the first European settlers arrived in the new world, the native Indians attacked to defend their homeland and hunting grounds. French fur traders soon began to exploit…
Hunting is a practice which has thrived through the centuries from the beginning of man to modern day civilizations. When the first colonists sailed to these lands and established the America that we know today, hunting was a skill they needed to master very quickly in order to survive. Since that time, hunting has sprouted a multi-billion dollar industry, fueled by millions of Americans who continue the tradition. Hunting has emerged as an outdoor sport, enjoyed by many. Like all sports, hunting has its brands, idols, and traditions. It has its rules and regulations, and penalties for not following them. Yet, unlike most other sports, hunting has a significant opposition from millions of people and groups across the nation. It’s argued that…
…I am not in a position to answer yes or no to the question. Considering the fact that “the law of the jungle” was contaminated by human law, I think everyone -not only mankind but all the animals- should live their lives peacefully. On the other hand, I literally eat a certain animals and think my life would be less satisfactory if I lost a chance to eat them.…
Firstly, hunting is an ethical practice as long as you restrict the waste of meat (trophy hunting). Plus, as long as you aren't putting a species (young ones compared to the cubs in the video) endangered if you kill their leader/dad (Zeus).…