Preview

Ethical Reasoning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
642 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Reasoning
Ethical Reasoning In ethical reasoning, the Trolley Problem is an excellent example of what most people find to be ethical and unethical. Unfortunately, there is really no right answer. However, the most common answers to the two Trolley Scenarios are: it is ethical to pull the lever, but it is unethical to push the very large person. In the scenario of having to pull the level and kill one person verses killing five people, most people’s reaction is to pull the level. This was also my reaction. The ethical reasoning behind this is based on the Teleological or Consequentialist principles, which focuses on the outcome or end result of a decision (Fritzsche, 2005). Whether a person acted in a morally right or wrong way depends solely upon the consequences of the act. In this scenario, more people benefited from the action because their lives were saved, thereby making it ethical based on the teleological or consequentialist principles. In the scenario of having to push the very large person and killing one person verses killing five people, most people’s reaction is that it is unethical to do such a thing. This was also my reaction. The ethical reasoning behind this is based on the Deontological or Nonconsequentialist principles, which consist of a set of rules – it can be generally classified as either rights or justice based (Fritzche, 2005). A person uses the set of rules to make ethical decisions based on logic and one’s duty. In this scenario, it is both unethical and illegal to knowingly and intentionally cause the death of an innocent person or any person for that matter, regardless of the situation. For some people, the two scenarios can be overwhelming, as well as confusing. In the first scenario, it is ethical to pull the lever and cause the death of one person opposed to doing nothing and causing the death of five people. Like the old saying, “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of one” (Meyer & Sowards, 1982). On the flip


References: Fritzsche, D. J. (2005). Business ethics: a global and managerial perspective (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. Meyer, N. (Writer/Director), Sowards, J. B. (Writer), Bennett, H., Phillips, W. F., & Sallin, R. (Producers). (1982). Star trek II: the wrath of khan [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Imagine a frail elderly woman laying in the nursing home in pain. This woman is 80 years old and has been diagnosed with terminal lung cancer and her heart cannot withstand treatment via radiation or chemotherapy. She has less than six months to live. Day in and day out you pass her room and hear her crying out from the immense pain. The pain medications are no longer working. She’s tired of fighting, tired of hurting, and tired of waiting to die. After consideration and discussions with her family she has decided to ask the doctor to help and end her life. The doctor feels remorse for the elderly lady and wants to help but cannot decide if it is the ethical thing to do because he knows that what he’s being asked to do is considered physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harris gives two objections to killing one person to save two people. First, a doctor's choice of whom to kill will be arbitrary. It is simply not fair to the innocent person who is killed. Author also added that it will create „terror and distress to the victims, the witnesses, and society generally." But we can set up a rule that removes these problems, and then the benefits will outweigh the „costs."…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    magine yourself living in New York City in 2001. Your father headed out to work early…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The killing of a sick individual, who does not feel the need to live, is wrong in my opinion. These individuals should be taught how to live with their sickness or handicap. They should be taught to value their life, and that just waking up is a blessing itself. There should not be the option of euthanasia for them to seek out. Whether it be active or passive, the person who is aiding or overseeing the death is morally wrong. They should be tried as a killer along with others who have killed for other reasons other than “helping another.”…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The inclination that killing is bad is certainly rooted in the world around us, but I believe it is difficult for the reader to identity with the bystander at the switch in the trolley problem. How many times have you had the power to determine who lives and dies? Hopefully few to none, because of this it is easier to feel inclined that killing is bad because we grow up understanding the punishment associated with it (jail). To abiding by utilitarian ideals does make it permissible to kill a bystander, but only if the apparent utility of the situation will increase. In reality it is almost always impossible to fully grasp the full effect of an action until long after the decision has been made. It is for this reason that utilitarianism is the most plausible way to answer these two thought experiments but also why actual application (such as in the example of the Surgeon) is rarely if ever…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the face of death, science and rationale, is it unethical to safely assist those who are suffering and have the desire to die with dignity and purpose? Physician-Assisted Suicide has and will continue to be a very controversial topic of discussion when talking about the health and dignity of the terminally ill. Although none of us ever want to think of our loved ones becoming ill, rates of devastating diseases such as cancer are rapidly increasing around us. This makes the probability of one of our loved ones being affected much higher. With only five states in the US allowing legal Physician-Assisted Suicide, leaving the majority of patients unequipped with all of the options for end-of-life care plans. Despite strong push-back from some concerned about…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In reading the Ethics problem box regarding the Trolley Problem I will attempt to answer the question of would I throw the switch. I have had the chance to research different profiles to try and answer this question.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My conscience would probably tell me to save the four but if I had the choice to save my son I’d have to do it. I don’t know if that’s the wrong thing to do but it’s the choice I would make. Now, let’s say we altered the dilemma even more. Say there was only one track with four people on it and then there was this innocent bystander next to the track and you had the choice to push that one person into the trolley to save the other four. Now in this situation if you were to push that one person into the trolley that would be considered murder where in the other dilemmas it was not. But, if we go with the same route as before where killing less is better then why not save the four by killing the bystander? The decision I would make would be to let the one bystander live because he had done nothing wrong and has no reason to die. I’m not saying that the four other…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that is attributed to philosophers John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism is a theory holding that the proper course of action is one which maximizes happiness for the majority. [2]It is considered a ‘consequentialist’ philosophical view because it holds the belief that outcomes can be predicted based on the course of actions. Utilitarianism is another way of stating ‘the end justifying the means.’ Deontologists argue that the means of ones’ actions should be ethical regardless of the outcome contrasting to utilitarianism where the outcomes must benefit the majority. [3]Deontology demands that ethical norms be used with the belief that there are transcendent ethical norms and truths that are universally applicable for all. Deontology reinforces that actions can be immoral regardless of their outcome because the actions made can be wrong in themselves. Through this Kant uses ‘a categorical imperative’ meaning one must act morally at all times. Kant believes that all people base their moral conclusions on their rational thought. Thus, deontology is another way of stating ‘the means justifying the end.’ Suppose an evil villain holds you and four others hostage and instructs you to kill one of the four hostages and if you chose not to do this, the villain will kill every one. You have no doubts about the reality of the villains’ treats therefore you fully believe that he will do what he says he will. This leaves you with two options. The first option is to kill one of the four and save the lives of the other three as well as yourself. From a utilitarian perspective one would come to the conclusion that they must kill the one person because…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ethics of Leadership

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stark, A. (1993). What 's the Matter with Business Ethics?. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 38-48.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don't trust the idea of anyone being worth five human lives, similarly as I don't have confidence in five individual's being worth one. In what capacity can a person approve of a judgment on a choice, with settling on a choice their deficient about making. The reason why I did not pull the lever was I didn't see myself being competent in making a decision like that for those individuals. I did not want to feel responsible for killing anybody. Being put in a scenario such as this one complicates the mortality of decision making but due to my beliefs, I feel like I made the right one.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a paramedic, my duty would be to render aid where aid is needed at any time in any situation. In the scenario, the question is asked of me as to who should I save and whose life would I choose to end to save the other. As a paramedic in a dire situation as this one the decision falls on me and my team to decide whose life is worth more. In this particular issue I would have to think fast and apply the fact that I have an obligation to save as many lives as possible at the same time as protecting the most vulnerable ones above anything and in this my duty is to save…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE TROLLEY PROBLEM

    • 677 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Using utilitarian ethics to solve the trolley problem – the principles are such that the balance of right and wrong are measured by the outcomes of an action. In the trolley problem the applicant in both…

    • 677 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, dying is not easy to death with no matter how a person tries to justify the whole scenario. However, if a loved one, who was terminally ill and in pain or so physically disabled they were incapable of helping themselves and wanted to die, would that be considered unethical if they begged the doctors or loved ones to help them? Derek Humphry who is an author and journalist has spent the last thirty years of his life campaigning the right to physician-assisted suicide. His wife Jean was diagnosed with inoperable bone cancer, was in extreme pain, and wanted her husband to help her die with dignity (Humphry, D., 1998). Does this make him a murderer, just because he helped someone he dearly loved? Everyone should have a choice when they know their life is ending, and the government needs to make a law specifically for those reasons.…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, the death penalty should be abolished because although it has its benefits, the bad outweighs the good in this particular situation. With the death penalty, innocent lives…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics