Preview

Ethical Issues Either for or Against the Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1403 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues Either for or Against the Death Penalty
In the history of the United States there has been much controversy on the having juveniles charged with the death penalty for their actions.Recent research into the costs of the death penalty in Florida revealed the state is spending as much as $1 million per inmate just for incarceration and appellate costs.Which in much cases is not at the economic reach of most states.Trial costs would add substantially to the state's total. Florida has over 400 inmates on death row. By taking these inmates through this process it is much less expensive then having to take care of the needs of inmates.By having the death penalty it is much easier for the state to control the inmates based on the level of their crime. Although some juveniles are to young for the death penalty I believe that it is ok to have them punished with it as long as the crime is reasonable. I believe that every crime should be treated with the death penalty if it meets the requirements, regardless of age.In March 2005, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty for those who had committed their crimes at under 18 years of age was cruel and unusual punishment and hence barred by the Constitution. Which in many cases may be debatable. For example, The United States Supreme Court believes that if a teenager or juvenile was charged with first degree murder that it would be to cruel to sentence the death penalty on the individual just because their under eighteen. In my opinion I believe that this is outrages not just personally, but I believe that some individuals whom have gone through a situation where one of their family members were killed without no certain reason and the criminal or person charged did not receive the death penalty would probably get them highly upset. Today in our era we live in a world where most of our criminals start their crimes at a very young age. With the population of teenagers in the United States, and the cases of teenage bullying and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to sentencing a juvenile who has committed a murder or heinous crime it all depends on the circumstances. There was a Supreme Court ruling stating that juveniles could not be charged with life sentencing because they felt as if this was violating the Eighth Amendment on cruel and unusual punishment. Marjie Lundstrom, Paul Thompson, and Gail Garinger agree with the Supreme Court ruling of not giving life sentences to children, Lundstrom feels if they think a juvenile is old enough to be charged as an adult then maybe they should lower the voting age to fourteen and Garinger feels that when sentencing juveniles to life in prison they’re also being denied access to a better education and left lost and hopeless and Thompson feels…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison. A few justices believed life in prison without parole for a juvenile prevents consideration for their chronological age and its features. But four justices disagreed saying that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished with a sentence of life in prison, or a 17-year-old would be released to society after he had gun down his fellow classmates and teachers. I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling. I believe that every juvenile who has committed a heinous crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. The victims of the crime would get the justice they deserve, they are at the age where they should know what they are doing, and brain development does not play a fact to juveniles committing heinous crimes .…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of June 2012, juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the eighth amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment,however justices argue that mandatory sentences reflected the will of American society that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished by life in prison.Juveniles should not be treated like adults because their brain is not fully developed. Juveniles are still immature and they are still risk taking and learning self control.I think Juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison because they still have a chance to rehabilitate themselves and their brain is not fully developed causing them to make bad choices.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, I think that the teens should be tried and convicted as adult. In most juvenile systems throughout the country, the juvenile courts lose the power to young person at age 21. For example if a 17-year-old teenager murder and is convicted of that murder, he can only be sentenced to prison or to a juvenile facility until the age of 21. Then he has to be let go. So he would only serve four years for murder whether he killed one, two, three or five people. Most people feel that a three, four or six year sentence for murder is insufficient. It doesn’t bring a sense of justice to the people who are suffering for the loss of their relative. Furthermore to allow these cruel criminal released after spending a few years in juvenile prison…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty for juveniles is a serious injustice issue. The death penalty for juveniles began with the English common law and the first who was executed was out of Massachusetts in 1642. Over the course of history, children could be tried in court as early as seven years of age. Children are vulnerable to so many different things throughout their young lives. These things involve peer pressure, stress, controlling their emotions, and more. More than likely, juveniles sentence to the death penalty come from homes where they are already physically, mentally, and emotionally abused, low income backgrounds, and other types of unstable environments. In the juvenile justice system, most believe the juveniles can be rehabilitated with effective counseling and mentoring programs. Sentencing a child to the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. These children do not think of the crimes alone. There…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles are considered juveniles and should be given juvenile punishment unless it's for something inhumane, such as murder. The United States of America has the highest teen murder rate out of every country. The reason is due to guns being easy to get, the amount of violence they see today, and the T.V. programs shown. The 2012 Supreme Court decision to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder was not a just decision, because teens should know better. They're old enough to know murder is wrong. Our country should give teens the punishment they deserve for the crime they commit. Murder deserves a life sentence whether a juvenile or grown adult.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some believe the juvenile death penalty should be categorized as cruel and unusual punishment. They also ask why is it permissible to treat juveniles as adults when it comes to punishing them. Critics also contend that the national consensus is against the death penalty, so it should be declared unconstitutional. Those who support the death penalty believe that punishment should be based not on the juveniles age, but on the severity of the crime. If you do the adult crime, you should pay the adult time, even if it means with your life. Juveniles know that murder is wrong and should be punished accordingly.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mary Elliott, I agree that the punishment must fit the crime regardless of the age but there are other things to consider such as giving the death penalty or life without parole for the juvenile who has committed a violent murder intentionally. Mental Health America feels that juvenile offenders should not be given the death penalty or life without parole because these sentences are inconsistent with the purposes that normally guide sentencing such as deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, or rehabilitation (Position statement 58, 2017).…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I initially found it almost absurd that people who support the death penalty, but I soon realized that the grieving families who lost their loved one would feel more comfortable knowing that the punishment had been paid. It And that for them, they can rest easier and continue on with their lives. And that with the process of the death penalty, the criminal would have an impossible chance to escape the prison and commit more crimes.Many of the students that favored pro death were affected by a criminal hurting one of their loved ones. And as soon as I realized this, it made perfect sense that they wanted the death penalty out of defense for themselves and their community, because they did not desire anyone to endure their…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic about executing Juveniles legally is an unsure topic, which is very discussable. The first know killed Juvenile offender, happened in 1642. He was legally executed, his name is Thomas Graunger. Since that execution 361 individuals have since gotten the death penalty There is a lot of arguing about this topic and people can´t get to a solution, this works out for everybody. There are people for keeping the death penalty for juveniles offenders and then there are those against as well.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniless Death Penalty

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Juveniles and the death penalty is a hotly debated issue in the criminal justice system. There are two different views on the death penalty some are for and some are against the punishment. Some see juveniles as young and influential and deserve a second chance to clean up and become a productive member of society, while others feel the punishment should fit the crime; no matter what age.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles & Death Penalty

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    March 1, 2005 was the day that the Supreme Court ended the death penalty for juveniles that committed vicious crimes such as murder prior to their 18th birthday. “"The age of 18 is the point where society draws the line for many purposes between childhood and adulthood. It is, we conclude, the age at which the line for death eligibility ought to rest," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.” (Totenberg) There has and always will be a division amongst society as to whether or not this decision was the right and whether the Justices who voted for the abolishment of the death penalty were correct.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays