Preview

Estrangement Of Labour Rhetorical Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Estrangement Of Labour Rhetorical Analysis
Exegetical Paper #3 Phil 436
For Marx, the structure of the relations of the means of production, or the relations of property, estrange us our world and work, ourselves, our species being, and others. What is estrangement, and what are its modes? How are they related?

In Karl Marx’s Estrangement of Labor, Marx explains that there are 2 main classes of citizens under the economic arrangement of private land ownership; the citizens that own property and the working class citizens who do not. Marx states that this 2-class environment proves to be hostile because the working class citizens suffer from impoverishment and separation from not only the products they produce, but also from themselves and the rest of the
…show more content…
Estrangement means that as workers put increasingly more time and effort into their respective products and labor, the more alienated from the outside world and their natural relations they become because are contributing to a world completely foreign to them. He goes even deeper into his definition by dividing estrangement into 4 categories, or relationships. The first is the relation of the worker to the direct product that he produces. The second is the relationship between labor and the act of production within the labor process. The 3rd aspect of estrangement deals with the separation between the worker and his inner being. Finally, the fourth definition of estrangement deals with the alienation of men to all other …show more content…
Being able to construct things out of inorganic material for survival is the core identity of who were are as human beings. “Physically man lives only in these products of nature, whether they appear in the form of food, heating, clothes, a dwelling, whatever it may be. Man lives on nature, means that nature is in his body, with which he must remain in continuous intercourse if he is not to die,” (page 76). This is the being and essence of what “man” is and is their species life. Men are superior to animals because an animal can only produce for itself while men can produce for all of nature. Through this system of private ownership that is so hostile, a man’s being is reduced to that of an animal. Man cannot be physically and intellectually free while working because work is not the natural means of production for a man. This takes away from a man’s natural activity and one begins to feel estranged from their species life. Marx reaffirms this by saying “in tearing away from man the object of his production, therefore, estranged labor tears from him his species life, his real species objectivity, and transforms his advantage over animals into the disadvantage that his inorganic body, nature, is taken from him,” (page 77). Man is alienated from the source of his identity and the purpose for human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Marx, although, believed the forces of production disenfranchised man from his ability to see nature in its grandeur. That is, nature in its beauty, has already existed in such form outside man's idealism and it is man's productive essence to work with the material around him that in turn recognised that beauty. Man`s natural work is warped by the unnatural forms of capitalist labour: the “superfluously coarse labours of life [make it so] its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them” (Thoreau, “Economy,” 2). Man’s drive is directed towards the desire of capital in “commerce” and “industry” (Marx, “Manifesto,” 210) which repurposes the labouring conscience of man’s “essence” (Ibid., “German Ideology,” 182) to the working “appendage of the machine” (Ibid., “Manifesto,”…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The worker puts his life into the object; but now his life no longer belongs to him but to the object”. This is because the worker’s labour is invested into the object, however as he does not own the fruits of his labour, which the capitalism appropriates from him. “Labour’s product—confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (p. 32). The more the labour produces the more he becomes estranged.…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844) Marx states the worker is alienated from the product of his work. He makes it for his employer,…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alienation is a sociological concept developed in various classes and divisions, it is a condition in social relationships…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx’s model helps to explain the industrial capitalism by first generalizing history leading up to today’s current society as being created due to the history of class struggles. Rather than the more traditional complex hierarchy system, Marx describes society as being split into two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He described these two classes in terms of binary oppositions, with one class having the absolute power, and the other being oppressed by that power. The bourgeoisie class was said to be the oppressor, which Marx defined as the social class that owns the means of production and the employers of wage labor in a capitalist society. Marx views the class as emerging from the wealthy urban classes in pre and early capitalist societies. They resulted when the demand for a larger scale and efficient means of production led to the division of labor and the arrival of industrialization. The proletariat class was said to be the class which was being oppressed by the bourgeoisie class. According to Marx they were the workforce of bourgeois enterprise and were a class of laborers which were able to make a living only as long as they…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the process of making these material goods, Marx believes that the worker becomes estranged or alienated. This is because the worker makes the products but isn’t able to keep it. The worker is also alienated from labor or the act of production because he puts time and labor into making the product. He is alienated from the nature of the material since he has no direct contact with the materials as they began in their natural forms, coming from the earth. He is also separated from himself his own emotions and feelings and since he must conduct himself according to the company policies.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nature of man is made other than; alienate what man is really capable of being?…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nra Gun Control

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The term "Alienation" in, what I dare to label "normal" context, refers to a feeling of separateness, of being alone and apart from others. For Karl Marx, alienation was not a feeling nor a mental condition, but an economic and social condition of class society. Not only in any society though, he (strongly identifying with a communist society) aims this social theory as that which affects a capitalist society. Alienation, in simple Marxist terms, refers to the separation of the large population of wage workers and the fruits of their labor; their production.…

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For Marx, its motivation is simply the financial framework. Social estrangement is a wider idea utilized by sociologists to depict the experience of people or gatherings that are detached from the qualities, standards, practices, and social relations of their group or society for an assortment of social basic reasons. Those encountering social estrangement don't share the normal, standard estimations of society, are not all around incorporated into society and are socially disconnected from the…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the course of time, members of society have experienced racial and gender inequalities to extend that members in society also face class difference. Class difference will dictate individual’s position of power in society. In society there are two groups of people, those who owns the means of production and those who don’t. In the article, “From the Communist Manifesto (1848)”, Marx examines the class division in society. The capitalist system divides into two different classes, the bourgeoisie in modern day known as the 1% and the proletariat which are considered the working members of society. This system is established to benefit the bourgeoisie (1%), thus leading to the alienation and exploration of working…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx commences his essay by maintaining that workers' miseries are directly proportional to their level of production; the more value workers attribute to their product, by virtue of their labor, the more miserable they become. Workers themselves are a commodity and the greater the value of their production, the cheaper a commodity they become. "The increase in the value of the world of things is directly proportional to the decrease in value of the human world." The end result of labor is its objectification into a thing, and the value of labor lies only in its objectification.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Furthermore he put forward an identity of humanity, which states that because the labour of the worker is the means for maintaining individual life and at the same time a manifestation of species-being, it must hold that the means for maintaining individual life must be the same as the manifestation of species-being, thus making Marx’s emphasis on labour, production and human essence…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    - At the time of Karl Marx’s schooling, one of the biggest and most influential German philosophers of the day and age was G. W. F. Hegel. In fact he was so influential that at the time most people were either Hegelian or anti-Hegelian. Marx, who at the time was a Hegelian, was studying G. W. F. Through this he derived the crucial concept of alienation, which can be described as the feeling that workers in a capitalistic society feel when they feel separated from their products of labor because even though they put in the labor for the product, the factory owners, or bourgeoisie, take the majority of the income, which in turn results in this feeling of alienation. Although perhaps one of his biggest notion that Marx took from Hegel was the ongoing struggle of Dialectical Materialism. Basically this is the idea that in every situation and moment there is a thesis, or viewpoint, and an anti-thesis, or opposing argument. And through time we as human beings possess the ability to find a common solution for these issues that result in a much more agreed upon synthesis, which is just the new thesis or argument. But as everything in the world goes, over time somebody will come up with a new anti-thesis for the synthesis which now becomes a new thesis, and once again we will work it out to find a synthesis. This process goes on to repeat itself over and over throughout history. From this Marx was able to alter the Dialectical Materialism into Marxian Dialectics, which separates the middle class from the working class. And also discovers that the biggest difference between them being that Marx stated that the anti-thesis is actually contained in the thesis. Another thing that the Dialectical Materialism gave to Marx was what he called “The five epochs of history”. This is the history of our struggles as humans finally being put into order and classified. The first is the primitive conflict. After that and for many years afterwards came…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays