Preview

Essay Why Did The French Army Lose The Franco-Prussian War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
642 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay Why Did The French Army Lose The Franco-Prussian War
Why did the French army lose the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-1871?

The overwhelming loss of the French army in the Franco-Prussian war can largely be attributed to two main factors; the weaknesses of the French themselves, and the reformed military strength of the Prussians. This essay will argue that although France had clear advantages in military experience and weaponry, the result of the war came down to logistics and organisation, in which the French were severely lacking.
Although it would be too deterministic to ‘explain Bismarck’s success solely by the mistakes of his opponents’, there were still many issues that made it much easier for Prussia to continue its victories streak and establish and unified Germany. Mirroring the result

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Dbq Essay

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    o Following Cavour’s example, Bismark in Prussia expands Prussian power in Germany and helps to defeat Denmark based on nationalist fervor (in 1860s)…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period 1900-1914, Germany’s political landscape witnessed extraordinary changes in which typical features associated with a parliamentary democracy- such as significant and influential pressure group activity and universal suffrage- were present. It can however be argued that this period also represented a time in which the German Reichstag did not truly represent the population due to old and corrupt voting system for Prussia which saw votes unfairly given and the role of all the chancellors- in particular Von Bulow- during this time, which saw unelected officials yielding greater influence than that of the Reichstag. Germany was a parliamentary democracy due to the many contrasting features of the political system. Germany may have had many features where a “parliamentary democracy” can be boasted, but there are also just as many contrasting points which expose the system as being corrupt and broken.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Armistice of June 23, 1940 was the end to a long summer between the German forces and the French military. After breaking through French lines in Belgium and pushing back the defense, the French officials knew that the war was finally over and that they needed to find alternative options to survive as a nation. The cause for this defeat is a debated question today, as historians attempt to understand the failure of the French to stop the invasion and protect themselves. In Julian Jackson’s book France: The Dark Years, the defeat is only briefly discusses, but points all of the blame for the failure on the military planning. This is somewhat similar to Marc Bloch’s Strange Defeat, which examines a firsthand account of the High Command that…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, we will focus on the development of the events on The Western Front where Germany faced France. All the powers had thought and planned their war strategy very accurately.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another major factor as to why the French force was successful during this time period was the quality of its soldiers, most important trait being the high moral and belief in the idea of both the French Republic and Napoleon. The command, control and organization of the army was a vital asset into explaining its’ success during this time. Societal factors are also apparent when evaluating the reasons for success of Napoleon’s force during these wars. Adoption of conscription and the development of the doctrine of total war would mean that war involved the entire of a nation’s society. The most important factor however would be the individual leadership qualities of Napoleon himself, being able to use the other factors together in order to obtain the victories during the first five coalition wars. Nevertheless French success can also be credited to the failure of the coalition powers in the majority of these factors and the lack their lack of military…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Prussia realized Germany’s vulnerability, seeing how its loose union and its central geographical spot in the continent made it vulnerable to attack from strong neighbors like France and Russia. So, Prussia set out to unify Germany to form one large, stronger state. However, this unification could not have been possible without Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian noble who had risen through the ranks to become a major political figure and the driving force behind German unification. The question is begged, however: how did Bismarck do it? How did he rise to power and unite these fragmented pieces into one union? Well, for one, Bismarck had connections. A noble by birth, Bismarck had high social standing, but no governmental or military background that would facilitate a career in politics. Nonetheless, he befriended two military generals by the names of Helmut von Moltke and Albrecht von Roon. Moltke and Roon, both cunning military minds and dedicated ideologues, rose up the Prussian power ladder. In 1859, Roon was appointed minister of war, allowing him a direct link to the king. A strong believer in Bismarck’s potential, Roon lobbied the king to appoint Bismarck to a high post. It was a success, and in September 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president. Now that Bismarck had reached high office, it was up to him to use his power wisely. This is where Bismarck’s political cunning comes into play. Soon after receiving his position, Bismarck began winning the king over. Within a short while, Bismarck…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prussia was once a massive empire, it had a strong military, many different ethnic groups, and a bunch of different leaders, that made the empire better. I will talk about some of the different leaders of Prussia. I will also talk about some of the things that made the military so strong and feared. I will also talk about what happened when Germany and Prussia finally became one. Next I will talk about all of the problems that this new empire had because of religious, and cultural tensions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is A Founding Father?

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bismarck almost single-handedly unified Germany and brought it to one of its most prosperous points in history. Some may say Bismarck was a diamond in the rough. After all, he came from a very unusual background but that did not stop him from achieving greatness even in his younger years. Otto von Bismarck was born the first of april in 1815 in the german…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of Germany is one of deep and influential occasions that throughout time have shaped the way that Germany is viewed as a nation. But none stand out more vast and influential than that of the Unification of Germany. The official formal signing of Germany into a politically and administratively nation state did not happen until 1871 in Versailles in the famous house of mirrors. This momentous occasion was not an overnight project, Instead a long string of castrated events that proved to be glorious in the end. From the early stages such as the Napoleonic wars that collapsed the Holy Roman Empire and then shaped the confederation of the Rhine, to the exulting Franco-Prussian war that left France defeated and dominated after the momentous victory of Germany against the French in 1870. All these events helped shape the unification of Germany into one sovereign state and into one of the high and dictating powers of the world at the time.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays