Essay On Let's Not Move To Mars

An expensive trip to Mars in a small rocket with malfunctioning technology sounds great… right? Valuable resources being used for a trip that might fail. Competition between other countries for the power of this trip. Even though Mars is a great place for scientific discoveries, is it worth it? People should not spend valuable resources to go to Mars because of how the technology might fail and how grueling the trip would be. To begin, we should not waste valuable resources to go to Mars because the technology might fail. In the article, “Let's Not Move to Mars,” the author states, “As with all cutting-edge technology, there will be continuous threats of equipment failures, computer malfunctions, power interruptions, and software glitches.” This is a huge setback, you can't have brand new technology without enormous chances of problems. We cannot take chances with the technology. To sum up, people shouldn't waste these precious resources to go to Mars if all the technology is very unstable. To add on, the people on the flight to Mars would have a terrible time, so why waste the resources? In the article, “Let's Not Move to Mars,” it states, “Using current technology and conventional chemical rockets, a trip to Mars would be a grueling, eight- to nine- month- long nightmare for the crew. Nine
But, why even try for this when the trip is very expensive. In the article, “The Cost of Space Exploration,” it states, “It is about $10,000 to put a pound of anything into a near earth orbit.” If it $10,000 to just put one pound into near-earth orbit, then why do we think we should go way past near-earth orbit all the way to Mars? $10,000 per pound is expensive enough, let's not push that price way further. To conclude, we should not waste valuable resources on a trip as expensive as