Preview

Essay On Eminent Domain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1001 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Eminent Domain
Eminent domain is the right of a government to expropriate private property, by fiat, for what it deems is ‘public purpose’. Historically, it has often been subsumed within sovereignty and counted as its attribute. Eminent domain comes from the Latin phrase dominium eminens, taken from Hugo Grotius’s legal treatise, De Jure Belli et Pacis (on The Law of War and Peace), written in 1625 . It allows the government to transfer or re-allocate private property rights against the payment of ‘just compensation’. Though the concept has evolved over time, it is distinctly different from forceful acquisition of property in an exhibition of power, by a person at the helm of affairs of a political state. Here ‘just compensation’ becomes a defining and distinct feature of eminent domain. Eminent Domain is the right of the government and not its power, that is, rights must have limits. It is interesting to note that, while compensation has been an important feature of this right, consent was not always explicitly discussed. It has come to become part of the later interpretations of the right and the concerned governing act or law, for most …show more content…
Clear property rights must be characterized by the bundle of rights allowed to owner of the property-use rights, right to exchange etc.; or by benefit of exclusion- one person’s property right excludes all others in ownership and sharing of benefits arising out of ownership. Keeping this in mind we will attempt to answer two questions- i) What is the basis of eminent domain in terms of property rights and ii) how important are private property rights to the proper implementation of eminent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the wake of these actions, the city authorized the purchase of property within the development area and to utilize the acquisition of land through eminent domain if need be. Supported by the 14th amendment, the 5th Amendment allows local government the powers to utilize eminent domain to take private property for public use while appropriately compensating the former owners (Supreme Court 2004). During these acquisitions nine party members did not wish to sell their properties and challenged the taking of their land; stating that the transfer of land from one private owner to another to further economic development was a violation of the 5th amendment.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, the City of Monroe, North Carolina decided in April of 2002, to supply the citizens of Monroe and surrounding area with natural gas through a direct connection between its natural gas distribution system and the Transcontinental Pipeline. The Transcontinental Pipeline transports and distributes natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico up through the northeastern United States. The parties of this case requested the court to focus on the validity of a local government’s exercise use of its power of eminent domain. According to our textbook, Business Law Text and Cases, eminent domain is sometimes referred to as the condemnation power of government to take land for public use. The town of Monroe, North Carolina entered into an agreement with the town of Midland to facilitate the acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline by acquiring the rights of way to local land required for the installation of the pipeline. Per the agreement, Midland had the option to tap the pipeline at discounted rate. Midland then exercised its eminent domain authority to condemn the need…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Eminent Domain

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He then noticed that on his front door a letter was posted communicating that the city authorities will be taking his property by eminent domain to create new businesses and jobs in the community. Not unlike the mountain property Martin is now facing another dilemma in which he is uninformed and reacting to an active developing issue. Therefore, I proceeded to explain that eminent domain or taking clause is a constitutional right granted by the Fifth Amendment that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” (Miceli,2015). Similarly, to Martin’s situation, I shared the Kelo v. New London case which was one of the most controversial cases concerning eminent domain, that precipitated protest across the U.S. Likewise, the facts from the Kelo’s case corresponds with Martin’s issue with the government seizing private property to sell to private developers, hence is where Kelo felt that New London was overstepping and violating the Fifth Amendment by selling the private property to a private developer instead of using it for public use (Kubasek et al.,2016). However, the decision ruled in favor of New London for the reason that, the city seizes the property to…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Kelo v. City of New London, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that examined the power of the government in the exercise of the power of “eminent domain” (Scott 119). This power involves the authority of the government to take over the land from property owners forcefully. The guarantee to this power is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, whereby the Federal, state or local representations of the government can forcefully possess or take over land from homeowners.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. The Eminent Domain is the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation. I think this can be a good thing for the…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a state agency, TxDOT has the power of eminent domain and acceptance of the $32,384 offer will avoid condemnation proceedings against HCC for the parcel. The trustees approved this sale without…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government’s use of Eminent Domain has both a positive and negative effect. The government has the ability to Eminent Domain for various reasons but generally it is with regard to public interest. In most cases this procedure is exercised for very good reasons or with the intention of good that would benefit the majority. In cases where there is a vast amount of benefactors it can be appreciated. Things like infrastructure, increase in workforce and other things that will bring revenue in an area are often much needed.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eminent Domain is the power of government to take private property for “public use”, which is found in the 5th amendment of the Constitution. Eminent Domain has a positive and negative impact when it comes to society and an individual’s life. It has many positive impacts when it comes to the society, eminent domain may bring new schools, roads, and buildings. I do believe that eminent domain should not be used in the taking of private property for commercial use. I support the idea of eminent domain when it comes to the use of public use but oppose of the idea when it comes to uses such as shopping malls and office buildings.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking Clause

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Within the United States government, private property can be taken from a private owner using eminent domain as long as the original landowner is just compensated and the property is used for projects that benefit the public. However, in many situations, property has been taken with the intention of benefiting communities economically, creation of new jobs and tax revenue, but alas projects have failed. By law the government, whether it be national, state, or local, must pay compensation to the private owner, the issue with this is that the owner only receives compensation of the value of the property, not time, effort, or the cost of relocation. The government should not be able to have the power to take property from private owners unless…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Questions regarding one’s right to ownership of land and property has been an issue much discussed, debated and responsible in creating a stir of conflict in the attempt to find a conclusive answer on subject. In John Locke’s Second Treatise on Civil Government, published in 1690, Locke addresses the matter in question in the fifth chapter titled: ‘Of Property’. In his work, Locke builds an argument that displays how an individual obtains an ownership of property by means of labor. Locke is able to justify his position on the point at issue through the word of God and through simplistic scenarios he illustrates to his reader. Moving forward, in 1874, Chief Seattle conducted a powerful speech to Govenor Isaac Stevens and to the nation, a speech…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Notes

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. One rule that emerges from the social contract is that people should never make unsupported judgments about one another but should instead always investigate the facts in an effort to uncover the truth about the character of a person or the nature of a situation.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People hung, women treated as criminals, children branded for their religion, hundreds of people dying because of the government. A government where religion was the law and if you did not conform with what the Puritans believed, your life was in danger.(Solid hook!) However, things could be different with one phrase: the Establishment Clause.(Nice transition!) The lives of people in the Puritan society would have been different if the Establishment Clause had been enforced at the time because there would be a separation between church and state, Quakers would have been able to practice their religion and they would have lived peacefully.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the above, it is evident that dominium solely did not provide for the right to use and benefit from the res due to the development of bonitary ownership. According to Mr J.A.C. Thomas, dominium was “…simply the ultimate legal title beyond and above which there was no other.”…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aboriginal people have been fairly successful in having their issues addressed after 1980. While there remains many issues that have not been dealt with, a number of the major problems related to Aboriginal rights have been fixed.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment is about freedom of speech for all; the press included. This amendment is against prohibiting people from their free exercise of their religion. The first amendment can and have been violated; therefore lawsuits occur but is the amendment enough to win a case?…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics