Essay On Democracy In Canada

Canada has relative advantage of experiences in conducting elections, ensuring peace, policy making and integrating gender equality, managing civil and common law codes, preventing conflicts, etc. Outputs of Global Economic Governance Program require western countries to prioritize the import of other country expertise with the aim to complement its own expertise and not for substituting the same. Traditionally Canada has been working towards getting freedom to make decision and ensuring international stability for betterment of its people. This view has been recently changed and focus is now towards restoring democracy. Literature review of 1980s led to this thinking that two democratic countries do not go to war with each other. The policy
The failure was mainly attributed to not able to implement liberal and good democracy, unable to support and protect the participation of people in the democracy process and inability to provide political, civil, economic or social rights to its people for their betterment. Hence for Canada, main priority should be to ensure good democracy first inside their own country and then go for democracy promotion business outside to achieve international stability or freedom of making decisions for its people. Note: This paper attempted to access the prevalence of democracy in Canada based on statistical test which signifies the association of Liberal democracy with Economic and Social growth measures such as above average GDP growth rate. No literature however attempted to do this; we find it prudent to do with an assumption that country which is impacted by international instability, lack of freedom to make decision for its people or lack of liberal democracy will be war ridden, conflict ridden and unlikely to have above average GDP growth. So above average GDP growth rate has been assumed to be benefits of effective, good and liberal