Essay On Concealed Weapons
On Friday, December 14 there was a shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary. A man shot an entrance into the school, through the front office and then continued toward the classrooms. He walked into a Kindergarten classroom of 14 innocent 4 and 5 students and a substitute teacher, in which he shot all of them. He continued toward a first grade classroom in which he shot the teacher and six of the students. This is all could have been stopped if a citizen with a Concealed Carry Permit, CCP, was near during the incident. A school isn't allowed to have guns on campus and that makes it all the bit more easy for a shooter to walk in and not be stopped. Concealed weapons should be legal in all states because it is a right of the US citizen, can stop
…show more content…
“A 2013 research article in the Wall Street Journal reported that the average police response time to an emergency call is 11 minutes, with some responses taking much longer”(“Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun?”-Pro 6). This quote shows that police can’t always get to the situation fast enough to stop it. If you have the ability to stop it before anyone is killed or hurt then that is considered safety and defense. For another example, according to Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, “police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact.” This shows that even when a shooting does break out they usually get the guy buy investigating not stopping him. To further explain, according to “Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun,” “In addition, the Supreme Court has ruled more than once that police officers have no legal duty to protect citizens from violent crime.” This is explaining how even though people think that cops are going to stop a crime, the cops aren’t responsible for protecting the citizens. This is basically saying that citizens are responsible for protecting themselves. How are you going to protect yourself from a shooter if you don't have a weapon. You can defend yourself from an armed person with nothing. It's like trying to get water from an empty glass, it will never
“A 2013 research article in the Wall Street Journal reported that the average police response time to an emergency call is 11 minutes, with some responses taking much longer”(“Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun?”-Pro 6). This quote shows that police can’t always get to the situation fast enough to stop it. If you have the ability to stop it before anyone is killed or hurt then that is considered safety and defense. For another example, according to Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack, “police do very little to prevent violent crime. We investigate crime after the fact.” This shows that even when a shooting does break out they usually get the guy buy investigating not stopping him. To further explain, according to “Should Adults Have the Right to Carry a Concealed Handgun,” “In addition, the Supreme Court has ruled more than once that police officers have no legal duty to protect citizens from violent crime.” This is explaining how even though people think that cops are going to stop a crime, the cops aren’t responsible for protecting the citizens. This is basically saying that citizens are responsible for protecting themselves. How are you going to protect yourself from a shooter if you don't have a weapon. You can defend yourself from an armed person with nothing. It's like trying to get water from an empty glass, it will never