Preview

Essay On Abolishing The Electoral College

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Abolishing The Electoral College
America is not a democracy, although America may say it is. This idea shocks and angers many Americans, however they would be more enraged if it was a true democracy. The definition of a democracy means the majority rules, but if this was how elections operated, the U.S. government would be hectic. The government would focus on large cities and small, meager states would be left voiceless. Abolishing the Electoral College would cause elections to become more regional, more unfair, and more corrupt.
The Electoral College allows elections focus on smaller states, creating a national election. The government was created to appease to the states; with the Electoral College, states have a louder voice.“States are allocated one elector for each of
…show more content…
“Such a form of government (republican democracy), the Founders believed, would allow them to achieve two potentially conflicting objectives: avoiding the "tyranny of the majority" inherent in pure democratic systems, while allowing the "sense of the people" to be reflected in the new American government”(Ross). The sense of the people was important to the founding fathers. They wanted the small potato farmer from Idaho, the corn farmer in Iowa, and the cattle rancher in Texas to be involved in the nation’s politics due to their hard work and dedication. Without the Electoral College their crucial voices would be drowned out by the millions of voices in large cities who may not understand their way of life. “The Electoral College protects and empowers minorities... by forcing candidates to compete for states rather than for individual votes, the Electoral College system gives minorities a stronger voice” (Science Buzz). It is important for everyone to have a voice and contribute to their nation. The Electoral College provides a way for minorities to have a voice and be part of their state and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 4 Study Guide

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason why the Electoral College was created was because our Founding Fathers were distrustful in allowing the president to be elected directly by the people. As a result, the Electoral College would be a system to determine who will be the next president and who will be the next vice president of the United States though the votes of electors from every state. This would create an indirect way for votes to elect their president.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Partisan Bias Analysis

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 1787 constitutional convention, there were many ideas discussed on the election of the president. This, to the demise of some, this is where the idea of the electoral college was formed. The original idea was that the most intelligent and high off people should be the ones to elect the president because the framers feared that the public majority was too uneducated to make decisions regarding the president and their opinion would shadow out the opinion of the minority opinion. Unfortunately, these ideas are still used in the presidential election process.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason is because it allows for the possibility that one candidate would win the majority of the popular vote across the nation, and still be able to lose the election if another candidate wins the electoral vote. This has happened on more than one occasion, most recently in 2000 when George W. Bush won the electoral vote and became President despite the fact that his opponent, Al Gore, won the popular vote. The world was shocked when Bush was named winner of the U.S. presidential election, even after more U.S. voters had cast ballots for Gore. How could the U.S. call itself a democracy, yet not select its officials based on majority rule? The U.S. was not established as a pure democracy, but as a republic where voters elect representatives and electors. Whether there has ever been anything close to a pure and total democracy is debatable. There has never been universal suffrage. The result in 2000 election led many people to call for Electoral College reform or a change to a direct popular vote system. No major changes have yet been made to the system; the electoral college remains the “democratic” way we elect the President of the United…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2000 election, Al Gore and Ralph Nader split the left wing vote. (Document 5). While Nader only won 3% of the popular vote, the election was so close that 3% more of the popular vote would have put Gore in office. (Document 5). This also happened in the 1912 election, when the Republicans split the vote between the incumbent Roosevelt, and Taft, allowing Wilson to win. The voters know that this will always be the result, so they do not vote for the party that their beliefs align with the closest. Instead, they vote Republican or Democrat to actually have a chance of winning the election. Third party candidates cannot win not only because of our two-party system, but because of our winner-take-all system. If two candidates split the liberal vote, the conservative party will win all the votes in that state. If this trend continues, the conservative party will win the entire election. (Document 6). If the United States based elections on the popular vote instead of the Electoral College, then people would be more likely to vote with the party they agree with most, not the party that is more likely to win. This would make citizens actually want to vote because they have more options and they would feel like their vote actually…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael M. Uhlmann, government professor at the university of Clairemont, explains the benefits the Electoral College has to offer. He claims that the if the Electoral College were to ever be abolished, terrible consequences would follow. If abolished, the two-party system would disappear and a drastic growth in factional parties will arise. Without the two party system, Uhlmann believes that, candidates would not have a center to work toward. He argues that the two-party system “forces the ambitions of presidential candidates into the same constitutional mold that defines and tempers American political life as a whole” (Uhlmann, 2008). This system makes for a more equitable…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the founding of the Constitution, it was assumed the general population would be far too uneducated to properly elect their representatives. From this unfortunately accurate presumption, came the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a gift from the founding fathers that has, in turn, counteracted the impact of low voter turnout.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral college isn’t needed or wanted for some people because they want full control through their peers in the state and from the entire population worldwide. The uneducated people feel as if their vote doesn’t count which it does, but just not to their standards. When people felt their votes didn’t matter they were depressed, which then fuels them to vote badly the next election. Depressed voters could affect the election because it is a honest and loyal vote being given at the time. So, if people got the feeling that their vote counted it would be in their favor and they wouldn’t be depressed but a little satisfied. Basically the bottom class and unwealthy want more power, this would corrupt the world. The rich and wealthy wouldn’t agree with the others vote, but through popular vote majority rules. Without the electoral college the election would be all popular vote and if that was to be a split decision it would then force the House of Representatives to select a president. Also the people will have their power, but they would choose a minority president which means the wrong guy is in charge all because of a very uneducated vote. Next the votes wouldn’t be direct at all it would be hard to choose two overall candidate to vote and support the republican and democrat party. With no electors and their education…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be a true democracy, the people should have the power to elect who they want as their officials. The problem is though, we are not a true democracy; we are a compromised, partial democracy. This is why the voting system should adhere to the desires of our citizens.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By playing sides, electoral college tries to represent the state as a whole, based on the popular vote. Electoral College should not be used to determine the President-elect because the system fails to represent the country as a whole.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College should not be abolished, because if it is then the election process would collapse. The Electoral College was created because “normal citizens” were not deemed worth of voting because they would not know what or who they were voting for. The system is built in a way that is complicated, but it works, here is how it works: all US states and DC get one electoral vote for each of their US Senators and Representatives. The Representatives’ votes are determined by the decennial census, and the US Senators have 2 per state. There are 538 votes in the Electoral College and all the candidate needs to get to win is 270 votes. This is a system that has been around since the Constitutional Convention, so why is there any reason to change it. The reason that it has been around for so long is because the Electoral College was made so that the two major political parties would have an advantage against the minority or third parties. They did this because the third parties focus too much on one issue and that would be disastrous for our government. But third parties do deserve to still be in the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics