* « Do companies have a responsibility not to destroy the environment or should profits be allowed at any environmental cost? »
Although environmental issues influence all human activities, companies and usual people have integrated green issues into their way of life. This is a kind of marketing, or not. As society becomes more concerned about natural environment, business have begun to modify their behavior against this new and current problem, but at what price for them? Some businesses have been fast, to appropriate in their structures concepts like environmental management and waste minimization. We can see a change in every organizational activities, as in marketing, for example Mc Donald change their previous red logo, in green one, A new one, for a new eco-system protecting plan. In this research we are going to see many element, which will prove that companies have a responsibility to take care about the environment.
In this research, a melting pot of arguments will be show, to understand if businesses and factories have to pollute instead of adapting their way to work in function of environment and sustainable development. Real fact will help to understand the point of view.
Firm’s activities have big environmental impact, its take a major part of naturals resources and reject in the environment. Oil and chemicals industries are not the only companies, which polluted. Every single firm consumes raw material as water, energy and others. It’s also rejected some substances more or less harmful in the environment. More over the intensive consumption of raw material have big impact on the extinction many species, or animal can become endangered. Deforestation in some country appears because companies want to produce more and more, always more. If firms continue to take resources as now, there will be an exhaustion of raw material as oil and gas. Climate change is partly caused by every reject by firms, in terms of polluting gas, chemical stuff and pollution in the see. As “good planet” said in their article, a cellulose factory has been closed by the government because they notice that to much pollution as been providing by this factory. In fact, around this factory the Baïkal lac was very pollute. The vice Prime Minister Arkadi Dvokovitch announces that the factory will be close as soon as possible: “We decided to close the plant cellulose Baikalsk”. As the government said, a care project is taking part in this area of Russia. The fact that firms do not respect the environment can be dangerous in different way. In this case, 1700 peoples became unemployed, because it shutting. Population becomes less and less happy because of the different ways of pollution of the country. That is why everyone losing something: government loses reputation, to let factories pollute in the country. Firms have to be shutdown because its disrespect the environment.
The reputation is very important for a company; it is one of the most important things to maximize profit. People’s way to speak about a company makes it stronger, if its have a good reputation. More often companies can have a bad rap; When it is important to see what are peoples problems and what are the environmental problems, company are less fascinate. Furthermore, it is usually the bigger business, which pollute the most. It is possible to make profit, and make a maximizing profit not in spit of polluting. But head directors prefer giving money to government as fines, instead of polluting less and earn less money. Refers to the case of Pfizer industry, which is one of the biggest pharmaceutical firms from France. As Bschool wrote in an article, Pfizer has the most important record of polluting action in all categories: “Pfizer has a bad record on numerous fronts”. This big company has been fined many times by authorities, for environmental violations, in terms of air contamination, because rejected lots of hazardous chemicals...
Bibliography: * "McDonald’s Golden Rules for Energy Efficiency and Sustainability | Sustainable Development and Humanitarian Causes: The Alternative Channel Blog." McDonald’s Golden Rules for Energy Efficiency and Sustainability | Sustainable Development and Humanitarian Causes: The Alternative Channel Blog. Web.
* "The 10 Most Socially Irresponsible Big Brands | BSchool.com Business Schools Directory." BSchoolcom Business Schools Directory The 10 Most Socially Irresponsible Big Brands Comments. Web.
* "Une Usine De Cellulose Qui Pollue Le Lac Baïkal Va Fermer." Une Usine De Cellulose Qui Pollue Le Lac Baïkal Va Fermer. Web.
* "Corporations and the Environment." - Global Issues. N.p., n.d. Web.
* "Sustainable Development Capital LLP." Sustainable Development Capital LLP. Print 2012
* Robert A.G. Monks and Nell Minow, Power and Accountability, 1991 an on-line book, originally written 1991
* Richard Robbins, Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism (Allyn and Bacon, 1999), pp. 233-236
* "Resources for the Future - RFF.org." Resources for the Future - RFF.org. N.p., n.d. Web
Please join StudyMode to read the full document