Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

essay

Satisfactory Essays
355 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
essay
Carlos Valenzuala Essay 1 Good and evil have no set definition. So it is impossible to say one way or another because there is no such thing to one person. Anyone could be good or evil; it is all opinion and beliefs. Human nature consists of more basic animalistic natures from previous evolution of humankind from the animal like practices. Human nature has no alignment unless you decide to give it one.
All human beings are born pure, innocent and sinless in nature and spirit irrespective of whatever faith one eventually adopts. How their family influences them and how peers like friends at the playground or school, mold human beings as they grow up. During these various stages all the positive input education, counseling, and influences are necessary for one to be good in nature. From infancy to adulthood if one has undergone through a poor or bad upbringing by his parents, through bad company and influence from among peers and friends coupled with bad influence derived from the print and electronic media then they will acquire all the evil character traits and will be necessary to do all sorts of things evil in nature. Human nature is such that people are born with a love to give and if they don’t have anyone to love they will struggle and snatch from each other and inclinations to defer or yield will die. If people accord with human nature and follow their desires, they inevitably end up struggling, snatching, vicious, and acting with violent abandon. Consequently, only after men are transformed by teachers and by ritual and moral principles do they defer, conform to culture, and abide in good order. Viewed this way, it is obvious that human nature is bad and good is a human product.

So, we humans are neither born good or evil by nature. Both good and evil are actually acquired through the growing up process, and in the same token they can also be discarded if one so wishes. Of course it is much harder to switch from evil to good, whilst it is easier to fall from good to evil.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Good and evil are polar opposites, yet one cannot exist without the other. To understand this intricate relationship, one must have a clear understanding on what exactly good and evil are. These two are not always so black and white, but good can be defined as acting agreeably with societical and personal values. Evil can be defined as going against those values. However, as societies and humans differ, so do their moral codes. What is seen as good in one society or time may be seen as evil in another. Two more factors to consider are intentions and actions. They are two separate entities. Actions are seen, and judged, by everyone else, but intentions are known only by the doer. This is why there is no clear-cut line between good and evil.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. Nurture: Is mankind inherently good or bad? In my personal opinion, I think that people are naturally born pure and innocent. In Frankenstein, the creature just wanted to be a part of the community, and when Victor created him, he was eager to learn and he had no fault.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often we wonder if we are “good” or “evil,” but we also question what makes us either or. Is it something we are born into or do our millions of different circumstances affect the way we behave? I believe that humans are inherently evil, and that society sets laws in order to keep our evils from seeping out. Lord of the Flies and the Holy Bible are excellent examples of how natural human instincts call us to sinful acts.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Hsun Tzu's, "Man's Nature is Evil" the author explains why the human characteristics are wicked. The author uses basic illustrations of people's jealousy and envy to prove that human nature is truly evil. Tzu's essay proves through many examples that man's nature is evil, and that everything that is considered good comes from people that go against their "evil nature" to make the concept of morality. Hsun Tzu's "Man's Nature is Evil" is a great analysis of human nature to suppose that in fact, man's nature is truly evil. The writer uses metaphors and history of human kind to support his reasoning. This paper will analyze Tzu's essay and propose with supporting facts that man's nature is justifiably evil.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people have a natural tendency toward evil- but with saving glimpses of goodness because people can choose to do the right thing or the wrong thing, but sadly, many go for the wrong option. Being evil is easier for humans since this comes naturally to them. Humans are lazy and we would rather be evil than good, man also has a tendency to think and put themselves before others, for example, when thinking about a problem or situation, it is natural for everyone to firstly think “Will that help me?” “Will I be safe?”…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    essay

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In an excerpt “Western Diet” from Michael Pollan’s, reminds us of the many different nutritional theories behind the large number of diseases that afflict those who eat the “Western Diet” However, Pollan disagrees with these theories and states that both the food and health industries are partially to blame for this. Pollan claims the food industry is to blame because they use these different nutritional theories to release new products, and that the health industry is to blame because they use these theories to develop new prescriptions and treatment methods. Denis Burkitt suggests that the only way to avoid this vicious cycle is to “go backwards to the diet and lifestyle of our ancestors” (439), which Pollan interprets as “eat foods that are less processed”. While this sounds easy enough, Pollan points out that this is not as straightforward as it sounds and that even factors like soil condition and livestock feed make this concept a daunting task. Pollan’s answer to this paradox is to simply eat smarter and he goes as far to suggest that we ourselves are part of the problem because we do not spend enough money or time in terms of preparation on food. Finally, during his conclusion Pollan gives us three rules that he claims will help us to “Escape the Western Diet”(437,) which include “Eat Food, not too much, and mostly plants” which is pretty simple when you think about it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies Essay

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humans are capable of many things, including evil. We are not perfect we are built on our flaws. But the evil…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Douglas is calls for freedom. He is craving the thought of it. Freedom is the key to his life. It is the engine to his life. It is right there, but he can’t reach it.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1) The setting refers to the time, the geographical locations, and the general environment and circumstances(halaat) that prevail(prachalit) in a narrative. The setting helps to establish the mood of a story.…

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, there are three main sinners. They are Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth. These three people all commit terrible sins including revenge, adultery, and murder. Of these sinners, Roger Chillingworth is the guiltiest of them all, and this is because he never felt remorse for the terrible things he did throughout the novel. Chillingworth sins were aimed to bring pain and suffering to others where as Hester's and Dimmesdale's sin was a sin of passion, and was never meant to hurt anyone.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Evil” – defined by Dictionary.com as “morally wrong or bad; immoral; harmful; characterized by misfortune or suffering” (“Evil”) – is a very complicated topic few people can fully agree on. The view on whether people are born evil or are raised to be evil is highly subjective. What some people consider to be evil, others might believe to be valiant. Although researchers have been exploring many different viewpoints to find the correct answer to this controversy, their results insinuate that evil is found in the eye of the beholder. However, with some of the world’s greatest reprobates nominated for Nobel Peace Prizes and others been given the key to a city, it can be derived that a person develops evil impulses…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    we essentially born good, only to be corrupted by the world and the people around us?…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientists and psychologists have different opinions regarding this. Some scientists see that people are born evil while others believe that people are naturally good. The Christianity concept of the original sin states that people are born with a normal psychological condition which is the desire for doing bad things. On the other hand, according to Islam, people are born upon Fitra. There is much research in the scientific and psychology fields that support the both opinions. Nevertheless, it seems that there is more convincing evidence for the opinion that says people are born good. “Society corrupted man; however, people were born good at birth”. (Cameron, 2013). Being good is one’s nature before getting influenced by the outside sources. We are all born good. However, we might develop tendencies for being evil depending on the surrounding circumstances. We come pure in this life; nevertheless, we learn how to be bad. Throughout the life, we learn and acquire evil and violence. We learn all the amoral qualities. We learn greed, selfishness, Gossiping, hatred, lie, and stinginess. It is impossible to be born with these qualities. There is no way to carry such genes in our blood. Human being is pure. However, society and environment contaminates us…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is Mankind Inherently Evil

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, the word ‘good is defined as “Of a favorable character or tendency,” and the word evil is defined as, “morally reprehensible.” Philosophers and Psychologist have debated on the topic of humans being good or evil for centuries and our society is still unsure of what to believe. Humans do not like to think of themselves as pure evil, but they also do not consider themselves all good either. Although some may claim humans are inherently good , the truth is humankind is inherently evil because of selfishness, and revenge.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nature of man is such that he is born with a fondness for profit” This quote is directly from Hsun Tzu’s writing “Man’s Nature is Evil”. The first sentence basically declares that because of man’s nature being evil, all of the goodness that he does comes from his conscious activity (meaning he would have to think about it, or remember something that was taught to him.) The second sentence says that he is born with the desire to do things that is beneficial to him. It later on explains that if he continues to give in to this desire, his sense of courtesy will…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays