In ancient China, many different rulers tried to unify and rule the country using a variety of methods – Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism to name a few. Each philosophy had its own set of rules of how people should act both in public and privately. The overall goal of each philosophy was to set a standard of acceptable living that would ensure harmony and success for the society. However, each was different and thus had different results. The best way for the people of China to succeed in a harmonious, respectable society occurred when both Confucianism and Legalism were combined.
Confucianism resulted from a Chinese philosopher named Kongfuzi (551-479 B.C.E), also known as Confucius, becoming disheartened with the way the government ignored his ideas of how to create a just, harmonious society. His teachings, which he had passed on to his followers/students, include the Analects. It is within this document that he tried to teach men how to be gentlemen. If a man were able to follow the steps to becoming a gentleman and complete the duties of his status, that gentleman could influence others in society to be honorable, hard working, honest, and just. However, within Confucianism, class and gender was a huge factor. Women were often considered less important as were lower class peoples. Only the well off male members of society could receive the required education required to be a gentleman. An example of this is: “The Master said, A gentleman who is widely versed in letters and at the same time knows how to submit his learning the restraints of ritual is not likely, I think, to go far wrong.”
As Confucianism required people to act a certain way in public, Daoism required them to act in private, individual way in order to influence harmony in society. Daoism itself follows “The Way”, a mysterious force that requires people to behave in such a way to keep the universe in balance. Daoism is considered to be non-conformist in that each person should live their... [continues]
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Both Confucianism and Legalism were developed in China during the Classical Period as solutions to bring back peace and harmony to the area. After the decline of the Zhou dynasty, there was a breakdown of social order (The Period of Warring States), so Chinese scholars and philosophers looked for ways to bring back a state of order and peace. Two different schools of thought, Confucianism and Legalism, developed as ways to move China out of chaos and help it return to stability. Another philosophy, Daoism, is similar to Confucianism and Legalism because it was also developed during the Classical Period in China as a solution to the disorder.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1.) Why did the political chaos of the Period of the Warring States give rise to philosophies such as Confucianism, Legalism, and Daoism? Compare and contrast these philosophies and explain which would be the most effective in ruling a large, complex society such as China.…
- 909 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Eventually the Zhou dynasty conquered the Shang, resorting to feudalism in order to preside over central China. (Gascoigne pg.2) (Encyclopedia Britannica) During this period Confucianism emerged spreading his thoughts on right behavior and with that acceptance of rank on the basis of mutual obligation. (Gascoigne pg.2) Daoism also rears its head, fulfilling China’s spiritual needs. Deism emphasizes “The Way and its Power.” According to Gascoigne, Bamber “Confucianism and Daoism are like two sides of the same Chinese coin.” Mirroring the idea of Yin and Yang, also conceptualized during the Zhou…
- 773 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Zhou Period takes center stage in China. Where various of philosophers offered there insights into how humans should behave in regard to their families, the state, and nature (Andrea pg. 84). Known as the "Hundred Schools of Thought" the Zhou Period was also an intellectual time. Three of the philosophies spoken in this chapter had there own thoughts of an ideal government and state were the Daoist, the Confucian, and the Legalist.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
During the classical era of China there were many cultural changes. The ideas of China changed due to the creation of three distinct religions: Confucianism, Legalism, and Daoism. Followers of Confucianism followed the ideas of Confucius; he believed that people should emphasize personal virtue, which included a respect of tradition. Because of those ideas it converted a large population of China. During the Qin and early Han periods Legalism was introduced but never got the amount of approval that Confucianism did. Daoism on the other hand gained many higher up people because of its elaborate spirituality and its traditional Chinese beliefs in nature’s harmony. During this time a set of Five Classics were written by Confucius that was used for Civil Service exams. Also poetry was well paid attention to due to Chinese melodic speech. Finally Chinese art, at this time it was decorative, and stressed careful detail and craftsmanship.…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Han China and Imperial Rome’s method of political control differs religiously. While Han China’s political method is centered around Confucianism during the beginning of the dynasty, and after steps of political change, around Daoism, society of Imperial Rome associates themselves, and is influenced by Polytheism. Confucianism is defined as more of a philosophy than a religion based on the reasons that Confucius, a Chinese philosopher and founder of Confucianism, taught philosophical and ethical ideas, glorifying humanity and shaping the traditional Chinese culture. Han China, after change in authority and rebellion, transformed from Confucianism into Daoism, a complete turnaround from Confucian beliefs, for Daoism comprises spiritual beliefs and glorifies nature instead of humanity. Imperial Rome, supportive of Polytheism, the worship of many Gods, differentiates completely with Han China for it is based solely upon the Gods the Romans worshiped, not philosophy or nature. Han China and Imperial Rome possess exceptionally different political methods of control through religion because before the Han dynasty, China created religious and philosophical systems in ways Rome did not.…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It is two main philosophies that started to compete in China 3000 years ago. They were not just philosophies, but state policy options to govern / rule the nation. Throughout the long course of China history, Confucianism came out on top. Most major ruling dynasties in China have adopted Confucianism. It even spread to Korea, Japan and Vietnam. Legalism emphasizes law, or a set of codes, to rule the nation. Everyone is equal before the law (this sense is vague in China); law rewards who obey and punish who violate. Confucianism, on the other hand, emphasizes morality---such as, human nature is essentially good, treating others as you treating yourself; and it stresses social order---i.e. high officials respect the ruler when it comes to state affairs; son respects father, young / inexperienced respect elder / experienced, when it comes to family…
- 669 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ancient China's system of government was very erratic, and as the mandate of heaven changed hands, so did the ruling body. The conflict at the end of the Zhou Empire was a result of the end of the dynastic cycle; corruption infiltrated the government and the system fell apart to war between states for power and peasant revolts. This lead a philosopher named Confucius to develop a set of ideals to live by. These codes were built on such virtues as honesty, trust, responsibility, and honor (Doc1). The drastic transition from Confucianism to its opposite, legalism is said to be the result of rulers who were open to new ideas on how to govern their ever growing empires. Sayings like "There is more than one way to bring peace to the world and no need to follow the past," influenced leaders. They were told that a strong government depended not on the moral values of its leader, but rather on strong institutions and laws (Doc6). Emperor Shi Huang Di used harsh punishments and ruthless tactics to maintain power, and thus was born legalism. The two system's views on different issues contrasted greatly.…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the ancient times when China was in the period of philosophical ferment, many ideas of governing a society has been established. Because of the harsh environment due to the fact that endless wars that occurred throughout the Warring states period, this era was the golden age of ancient philosophy in China. The influence of the war lead to philosophical ideas being developed and discussed by philosophers all over the country, and eventually, became the hundred schools of thoughts. Many famous philosophers in this period includes Confucius, Mencius, Meng Zi, Han Feizi, and many others. The two ideas that I’m most interest is Confucian and legalist ideas.…
- 1189 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
this philosophy was based on the teachings of Kongfuzi. He was born in the small country of Lu, Eastern China. He experienced first hand the chaos that went out when the lords fought for power. Kongfuzi deeply respected chinese traditions, such as reverence given to scholars. He also saw that society and government had to change if there was ever going to be peace and order in China. Confucianism was formed in 500 b.c.e, it was used there on. He also had books that explained that philosophy. Much of what Kongfuzi taught was revolutionary at the time. He mainly taught social teachings and political teachings too.…
- 430 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
As Legalist teachings were first adopted by the Qin dynasty, it is expected that Legalism should spread through the Chinese states. Further promoting their Legalist agenda, the Qin conquered several other Chinese states and unified China after a great period of war. In Legalist Views on Good Government, Fei-tsu tells the reader it is because the ruler of the state does not depend on the virtue of the people or a heavenly order of values to bring the state to uniform order, but rather those who are subjugated to the state not be allowed to do bad. It is because of this openly harsh disposition that led later Chinese to remove the Legalist doctrine. Thought the Legalist doctrine was removed, some of its fundamental values such as administration and criminal laws became a crucial part of later…
- 499 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Every “successful” nation, or empire, requires a legitimate social, political, and economical system. These are the foundations that every humanizing system needs to improve and expand the dynamics of the country. The dynamics is the ideology that it follows and lets it govern the nation. The ideology could be a religious, economical, political, or socially motivated force the derives the whole nation forward. I will argue that Confucianism is an ideology that strongly connects politics, “ethics”, and social structures as well as influenced majority of Chinese dynasties to adapt some of its principles.…
- 1499 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Legalism is yet another philosophical movement that shaped China. Legalism focuses on statecraft, reasoned by extreme disorders called for drastic measures. Started by the Han Dynasty, and adopted into the Qin Dynasty, legalism stresses the need for order above all other human concerns. Legalism was a political philosophy that did not ask higher questions like the purpose of life. Legalists believed that political institutions should be modeled after the realities of human behavior such as selfishness or kindness. Laws admitted punishments and rewards for specific behaviors, rewards for good behavior and punishments for bad behavior. This legal policy lead to the over throw of the Qin Dynasty.…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Back in the early civilizations of China, there was a major controversy between two different ideologies: Legalism and Confucianism. Legalism was a political philosophy that taught that a powerful and efficient government is key to maintain order and control over an empire. This ideology supports the fact that rulers should be strong and govern through force because people are naturally bad. Confucianism, on the other hand, was preached by a man named Confucius, who strongly believed that rulers should be virtuous and lead by a good example. Basically the whole idea behind Confucianism is to keep everything morally upstanding and honest to set an example for the people. Confucius believed that if the ruler or leader created a positive society then all of the people would just naturally follow and do the right thing if the leader shows them what is right. This ideology was meant to take violence out of government and other things. In contrast, legalism is a far different ideology in a sense that a successful government depends on the conformity to law. This ideology basically means that people really do not have the free will to do or say whatever they want. If they do that, the government will fall and cause anarchy with in the empire. The legalistic viewpoint on human nature is just that people will always do the bad thing if they are not punished. This refers back to when Hanfiezi said, “When a sage governs a state, he does not rely on the people to do good out of their own will. Instead, he sees to it that they are not allowed to do what is not good. If he relies on people to do good out of their own will, within the borders of the state not even ten persons could be counted on.” Legalism states that government as well as society can’t be successful without force toward the people. If I were a peasant, I would like to be governed by Confucianism. Although both philosophies have many differences they can be compared as well. Both of these philosophies…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Confucius started Confucianism. He felt that if rulers were honest and children respected their parents everything would fall into place. Human nature was considered neutral and it was what you did that determined whether it was good or bad, each person had a role that they must follow. Freethinking was encouraged. Legalisms approach was much more forceful, books were burnt and freethinking was discouraged. People were not inspired by their leaders but scared of them, human nature was considered bad; therefore rules and harsh punishments took place. Unlike the rest of the philosophy’s Daoism’s approach is much less focused on politics. The idea that humans needed to be in harmony with nature took place; it’s all about the balance of good and bad, yin and yang.…
- 254 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays