Information & Management 40 (2002) 25±40
The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational ®t perspective Kyung-Kwon Hong, Young-Gul Kim*
Graduate School of Management, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 207-43 Cheongryangri-Dong, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 130-012, South Korea Received 20 May 2001; accepted 1 September 2001
Abstract Since early 1990s, many ®rms around the world have shifted their information technology (IT) strategy from developing information systems in-house to purchasing application software such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. IT managers responsible for managing their organization's ERP implementation view their ERP systems as their organizations' most strategic computing platform. However, despite such strategic importance, ERP projects report an unusually high failure rate, sometimes jeopardizing the core operations of the implementing organization. This study explores the root of such high failure rate from an ``organizational ®t of ERP'' perspective. Based on the relevant literature, we de®ne the concept of organizational ®t of ERP and examine its impact on ERP implementation, together with ERP implementation contingencies. The results from our ®eld survey of 34 organizations show that ERP implementation success signi®cantly depends on the organizational ®t of ERP and certain implementation contingencies. # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: ERP implementation; Organizational ®t; ERP adaptation; Process adaptation; Organizational resistance
1. Introduction Under the pressure to proactively deal with the radically changing external environment, many ®rms have changed their information system (IS) strategies by adopting application software packages rather than in-house development [12,25]. An application package such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is one solution to the information technology (IT) industry's chronic problems of custom system design: reduced cost, rapid implementation, and high system * Corresponding author. Tel.: 82-2-958-3614; fax: 82-2-958-3604. E-mail addresses: email@example.com (K.-K. Hong), firstname.lastname@example.org (Y.-G. Kim).
quality . Although application packages have these bene®ts over custom design of applications, packaged software has problems of their own: uncertainty in acquisition  and hidden costs in implementation . In a survey of the IT managers responsible for managing their organization's ERP projects, twothirds of the respondents viewed their ERP systems as their organizations' most strategic computing platform . Despite such perceived importance, it was reported that three quarters of the ERP projects were judged to be unsuccessful by the ERP implementing ®rms . What makes ERP implementation so unsuccessful? Swan et al.  argued that the root of such high failure rate is the difference in interests between customer organizations who desire unique business solutions and ERP vendors who prefer a
0378-7206/02/$ ± see front matter # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 7 2 0 6 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 1 3 4 - 3
K.-K. Hong, Y.-G. Kim / Information & Management 40 (2002) 25±40
generic solution applicable to a broad market. Such con¯icting interests led us to explore an organizational ®t perspective of ERP implementation. An important criterion used in selecting an ERP system is the ERP ®t with the current business processes . Although the ®t between ERP and the organizational context is believed to be critical for successful ERP implementation, few examined the organizational ®t issues of ERP empirically. Soh et al.  suggested that the organizational ®t of ERP might be worse in Asia, because the reference process model underlying most ERP systems is in¯uenced by European or US industry/business practices, which are different from Asian business practices. The relative invisibility of the ERP...
References:  N.H. Bancroft, H. Seip, A. Sprengel, Implementing SAP R/3, 2nd Edition, Manning Publications, Greenwich, CT, 1998.  P. Bingi, M.K. Sharma, J.K. Golda, Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation, Information Systems Management (1999) 7±14.  L. Brehm, A. Heinzl, M.L. Markus, Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications, in: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, 2001.  R.B. Cooper, R.W. Zmud, Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach, Management Science 36 (2), 1990, pp. 123±139.  T.H. Davenport, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review (1998) 121±131.  T.H. Davenport, Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems, HBS Press, 2000.  G.B. Davis, M.H. Olson, Management Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985.  G.B. Davis, Commentary on information systems: to buy, build, or customize? Accounting Horizons (1988) 101± 103.  Y. Everdingen, J. Hillergersberg, E. Waarts, ERP adoption by European midsize companies, Communications of the ACM 43 (3), 2000, pp. 27±31.  T.F. Gattiker, D.L. Goodhue, Understanding the plant level cost and bene®ts of ERP: will the ugly duckling always turn into a swan?, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
K.-K. Hong, Y.-G. Kim / Information & Management 40 (2002) 25±40  R.L. Glass, Enterprise resource planningÐbreakthrough and/ or term problem? Database 29 (2) (1998) 14±16.  L.L. Gremillion, P. Pyburn, Breaking the system development bottleneck, Harvard Business Review 61 (2), 1983, pp. 130±137.  T.L. Grif®th, R.F. Zammuto, L. Aiman-Smith, Why new technologies fail? Industrial Management (1999) 29±34.  P.H.B. Gross, M.J. Ginzberg, Barriers to the adaptation of application software packages, Systems, Objectives, Solutions 4 (4), 1984, pp. 211±226.  V. Grover, S.R. Jeong, W.J. Kettinger, J.T.C. Teng, The implementation of business process reengineering, Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (1), 1995, pp. 109± 144.  J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.  M. Hammer, S. Stanton, How processes enterprise really work, Harvard Business Review (1999) 108±118.  M. Hammer, Up the ERP revolution, Information Week (1999) 186.  J.C. Henderson, N. Venkatraman, Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal 32 (1), 1993, pp. 4±16.  C.P. Holland, B. Light, A critical success factors model for ERP implementation, IEEE Software (1999) 30±36.  J. Iivari, The organizational ®t of information systems, Journal of Information Systems 2, 1992, pp. 3±29.  J.J. Jiang, W.A. Muhanna, G. Klein, User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across systems types, Information and Management 37, 2000, pp. 25±36.  P. Kanellis, M. Lycett, R.J. Paul, Evaluating business information systems ®t: from concept to practical application, European Journal of Information Systems 8, 1999, pp. 65±76.  K. Kumar, J. Hillegersberg, ERP experiences and evolution, Communications of the ACM 43 (3), 2000, pp. 22±26.  K.C. Laudon, J.P. Laudon, Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.  S.P. Laughlin, An ERP game plan, Journal of Business Strategy (1999) 32±37.  D. Leonard-Barton, Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization, Research Policy 17, 1988, pp. 251±267.  H.C. Lucas, E.J. Walton, M.J. Ginzberg, Implementing packaged software, MIS Quarterly (1988) 537±549.  R.K. Lynch, Implementing packaged application software: hidden costs and new challenges, Systems, Objectives, Solutions 4 (4), 1984, pp. 227±234.  J. Marius, S. Ashok, Package software: selection and implementation policies, INFOR (1996) 133±151.  M.L. Markus, Power, politics, and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM 26 (6), 1983, pp. 430±444.  M.L. Markus, D. Robey, The organizational validity of management information systems, Human Relations 36 (3), 1983, pp. 203±226.
 M.L. Markus, D. Robey, Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research, Management Science 34 (5), 1988, pp. 583±598.  M.L. Markus, C. Tanis, The enterprise systems experienceÐ from adoption to success, in: R.W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, Pinna¯ex Educational Resources Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 2000, pp. 173±207.  C.F. Nachmias, D. Nachmias, Research Method in the Social Sciences, St. Martin Press, New York, 2000.  W.J. Orlikowski, The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations, Organization Science 3 (3), 1992, pp. 398±427.  R.E. Pereira, Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for ®rms, Database 30 (1), 1999, pp. 38±46.  C. Prosser, D. Canty, Proof of concept: an ef®cient way to shop, APICSÐThe Performance Advantage (1998) 50± 52.  L. Radosevich, Measuring up, CIO, Framingham 12 (23) (1999) 52±60.  E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, Free Press, New York, 1995.  C.B. Schoonhoven, Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory, Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 1981, pp. 349±377.  S. Sharma, R.M. Durand, O. Gur-Arie, Identi®cation and analysis of moderator variables, Journal of Marketing Research 18, 1981, pp. 291±300.  J.E. Scott, L. Kaindl, Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package, Information and Management 37, 2000, pp. 111±122.  C. Soh, S.S. Kien, J. Tay-Yap, Cultural ®ts and mis®ts: is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM 43 (3), 2000, pp. 47±51.  D.W. Straub, Validating instruments in MIS research, MIS Quarterly (1989) 147±169.  J. Swan, S. Newell, M. Robertson, The illusion of `best practice ' in information systems for operations management, European Journal of Information Systems 8, 1999, pp. 284± 293.  J. Sweat, ERP: enterprise application suits are becoming a focal point of business and technology planning, Information Week (1998) 42±52.  M.J. Tyre, W.J. Orlikowski, Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, Organization Science 5 (1), 1994, pp. 98±118.  O. Volkoff, Enterprise system implementation: a process of individual metamorphosis, American Conference on Information Systems, 1999.  O. Volkoff, Using the structurational model of technology to analyze an ERP implementation, in: Proceedings of Academy of Management '99 Conference, 1999.  P. Weill, M.H. Olson, An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 6 (1), 1989, pp. 59±85.
K.-K. Hong, Y.-G. Kim / Information & Management 40 (2002) 25±40 Kyung-Kwon Hong is a doctoral candidate at the Graduate School of Management of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) in Seoul. He received his BS and MS degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Hanyang University and KAIST, respectively. He has worked for Korea Telecom during 10 years. His research interests include Packaged Software Implementation, Information Systems Innovation, and Knowledge Management. Young-Gul Kim is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Management of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) in Seoul. He received his BS and MS degrees in Industrial Engineering from Seoul National University, Korea and his PhD degree in MIS from the University of Minnesota. His active research areas are: Knowledge Management, IT Management, Data and Process Modeling and Customer Relationship Management. He has published in Communications of the ACM, Information and Management, Journal of MIS, Decision Support Systems, Database, etc.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document