Erikson believed that to properly study human development, one should consider the social relationships that a developing person will face (King, 2010, p. 305). This concept came about because Erikson began to explore how social life impacts psychological life, such as the relationships people make and the way they communicate within those relationships. Arguably, Piaget believed that to accurately understand human development, one must investigate children’s minds. He considered that to be able to understand their experience, human beings use schemas which is the brains categorical system for organizing knowledge (King, 2010, p. 294). An example of schemas is, if a child has only seen small dogs they many believe that all dogs are small. However, when the child sees a large dog, the brain will add this new information into the current schema made for dogs. This realization caused Piaget to take more of a cognitive approach to theorizing the development of humans. Both theorists believed that the idea of human development could be found in separate areas of people’s lives and by doing so, they developed two organized systems to follow the …show more content…
Both theorists studied the years between infancy and puberty to gain insight on how these fundamental years of childhood affect people as they develop into their adult lives. Though Piaget did have a more in-depth focus on children, mainly stemming from his year at a boy’s institution in France administering his “standardized Burt’s test of intelligence” (Smith, 2000), Erikson allotted four of his eight stages to examining the process of children’s growth. Both theorists clearly show that because the brain is changing and growing exceptionally more in childhood than at any other stage of life, it seems to shape the person into whom they will be personally and cognitively. This can be seen in Erikson’s belief that trust in others is established in infancy only if the child’s needs are met emotionally and physically (King, 2010, p.