08/01/13
Essay #3 final draft
Equal right for marriage
The American dream is one of freedom and equality. It’s supposed to be branded in the hearts of every United States citizen however, when it comes to homosexuals, citizens of the United States wake up and the dream is demolished. Same-sex marriage is the most conflicting issue in the currently society. Marriage is basically a private matter and a fundamental human right, so people should have the right to decide with whom they marry, not the state.
In the essay titled “Gay Marriage: Societal Suicide,” Charles Colson talks about his reasons for opposing same-sex marriage. The main argument is built around Colson’s belief that legalizing same-sex marriage would lead to the decoupling of marriage, and ultimately result in what he describes as: “an explosive increase in family collapse, out of wedlock births - and crime.” (P463) It seems like same-sex marriage is the death of family. However, in the other essay “Desecration? Dedication!” written by Anna Quindlen, she argues that gay couples, like career women, are being held to a higher standard than other people and that this is unfair (P461). Although she is not thorough for gay marriage but more for equal right. In comparing gays to naturalized citizens, author is pointing out how natural born citizens take for granted citizenship as well as thier right to get married. Straight people also divorce and crime. Marriage is for love, for responsibility. Gay marriage is just another expression of marriage.
Then, Charles Colson states the extremely opposition in gay couples having children. Among the statistics, Colson lists that: “Boys who grow up without fathers are twice as likely as other boys to end up in prison, and sixty percent of rapists and 72 percent of adolescent murderers never knew or lived with their fathers, and girls raised without a father in the home are five times more likely to become mothers while still adolescents.” (P463) He continues to mention additional studies that illustrate the link between children who come from broken homes and the development of behavioral problems and poor academic performance throughout the child’s lifetime. Anna Quindlen also indicates, “One of the chief arguments opponents have against same-sex marriage is that marriage is designed first and foremost to produce and shelter children. ” (P461) However, she explains that nowadays, more and more people who don't want to have kids, women who are past childbearing age. These all the behaviors from straight people, so having the baby is absolutely not the purpose for marriage. The essay also mentions, “Jonathan Rauch reports that the most recent Census found 28 percent of gay couples had kids. And that's probably an undercount.” (P461) The evidence provided by Colson effectively demonstrates the existence of a direct correlation between criminal activity and broken families, but not only for the gay couple families. Boys and girls who grow up without fathers also happen in the unwed and divorced families. Gay couples have their children or not just as the same as the straight people. People should use healthy eyesight to look all of condition of marriage. If two persons are closed to each other regardless of their gender, they should be allowed to marry with each other. No matter how their families come from, people have absolute no right to treat them differently or put pressure on them. They are just the two people who love each other very much. That's all what it needs to form a family. There is no abnormal marriage. The abnormal just lies in our eyes. Legalizing gay marriage is granting same-sex couples the right to marry and ensure all citizens have equal rights and opportunities.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Alternatively, Charles Colson’s essay is stronger, powerful, and confidence. “breakdown” is one of the strong words. Because it make people think about the negative things in Gay Marriage “family breakdown”. “Jews, Muslims, and Christians” those words remind people remember what they was taught. Deeply in their heart, Gay Marriage is wrong…
- 194 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Citing a recent court ruling that allowed a gay individual to stay in his partner’s rent controlled apartment after his partner passed away, thus qualifying the individual as a member of the deceased partner’s family, Sullivan uses many sagacious points that most readers can relate to. His choice of words and examples make it seem that he is passionate about this issue and the preservation of the family unit in general. Sullivan makes a prudent argument as to what could be gained by encouraging loving, committed relationships. Legalizing gay marriage would promote social acceptance, the same economic advantages and relationship security between two people who love one another. This would also encourage a deeper commitment that is harder to get out of. Also pointed out is that legalizing gay marriage would not jeopardize the legitimacy of traditional, straight marriage. Allowing the same rights to fellow individuals could only help to promote that which we all hold dear, family…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article ”For Gay Marriage,” author Andrew Sullivan argues for homosexuals to have equal rights as heterosexuals and that turning down these rights from them is taking away from their equality. Sullivan begins explaining his point on gay marriage by arguing with the definition of marriage. He explains that marriage simply just a strong, compelling bond between two individuals. He then continues the article by providing examples of…
- 214 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Most people believe that they deserve the rights they are gained by the government. An upstanding citizen who pays their taxes, serves their community and abides by the law should be afforded the rights of an American. However, not all citizens are afforded equal rights. Gay and lesbians are consistently denied rights that are typically taken for granted by the average American. Specifically, gay and lesbian couples are denied the right to marry even if they are upstanding citizens. They are held at an unfair disadvantage solely because of their sexual orientation. This discrimination must stop because gay and lesbian couples are law-abiding citizens too, who should be afforded the same rights as heterosexual couples.…
- 1088 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Both authors have some similar perspectives on the same sex marriage topic; one of them being sociological views and the matter of same-sex couples. In addition, both Evan and Andrew believe that family and friends who support and understand gay couples have a major positive on same sex marriage. Both authors discussed that many gay or lesbian children are being raised in a non-gay environment and that has a negative impact on the lives of children. The differences between Wolfson and Sullivan’s viewpoints are that Sullivan emphasizes the individual citizen, and Wolfson emphasize the importance of same-sex marriage. Some people are still ignoring the fact that our society is changing and evolving rapidly. Same-sex couples have been suppressing their voices throughout many decades, and now they are ready to fight for their freedom and the right to be married.…
- 1257 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In the United States, there is social unrest regarding the government’s denial of the right to marry for homosexuals. Plenty of conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination. Clearly we as a nation are undecided on this issue. 36 states have passed legislation banning gay marriages, yet the state of Vermont passed a law that allows homosexual couples the right to participate in civil unions. Some other states are also debating whether or not to allow these couples to marry. Unfortunately, the dispute has left the United States homosexual community in an awkward position. Gays who gain the same benefits from marriage would be a more productive part of society for two reasons: the benefits from marriage and the pursuit of happiness obtained from the right of gay marriage. Many gays disagree with the argument that marriage is a tradition. They believe we should not discriminate who may be married. It is clear where gays stand. They do not want to settle for less than marriage status.…
- 1500 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
If there is anything that gets me riled up and ready to debate, it’s the controversial topic of gay rights and those who appose them. In Charles Colson and Anne Morse’s essay opposing gay marriage, “Societal Suicide,” they express that marriage should be seen as a “traditional building block of human society.” It goes on to explain their tired and bias conclusion that marriage is a bond that should only be between a man and a woman. At the same time, they question the extinction of marriage because of same-sex couple’s oppressed desire to happily marry each other. How is making it legal for supporters of marriage and gay people in love to express their bond considered the end of marriage? Allowing gays to marry would not only promote marriage, but it would support the obvious right and humane decision to care for every citizen with liberty and justice for ALL! “Societal Suicide” explains that gay marriage is not only wrong, but goes against the natural order of the family system, as well as promotes “broken families” and crime amongst young people without mothers or fathers, all the while, weakening the meaning and status of heterosexual marriage. I do not believe in any reason for keeping people from being who they are if there is no harm being done to others. Gay marriage should absolutely be legalized because we all deserve equal rights regardless of skin color, religion, ethnicity, occupation, or sexuality.…
- 1282 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Charles Colson wrote the article “Gay Marriage: Societal Suicide” in 2004 claiming gay marriage will only lead to family break down and higher crime rates in America. Five states had “mocked” state laws and constitution by making it legal for same sex marriage causing instant news media in these areas (Massachusetts, California, New York, Oregon, and New Mexico). Therefore, president Bush announced his Federal Marriage Amendment trying to reinsure the traditional importance in marriage; to unite two individuals (opposite sex) and reproduce. Unfortunately, in America when children are raised in broken homes and grow up without knowing or being raised by their father’s statistics show higher crime rates, murder rates, teen pregnancy, and high…
- 117 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For centuries, equal rights have been a problem for countries. America was depicted as the home of the free and was a growing country in progress. Immigrants planned on seeking refuge in America and later save enough money to go back to their home country. Later, immigrants decided on settling in America and to raise their family in hopes of a better future for their children. Their home country may have been going through a phase of a war, discrimination, or environmental issues. Long ago, women soon began to grow tired of being a housewife and soon demanded equality. However, with the help of many inspirational leaders, this gave the lives of many to have equal rights and tremendous progress has been shaped then by how it was before.…
- 533 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Our nation was founded on a bedrock principle. “We are all created equal”...This morning the Supreme Court recognize that the constitution guarantee marriage equality. Doing so, they reaffirm that all American are entitle to the equal protection of the law. That all people should be treated equally regardless of who they are, or whom they love…”(Whitehouse). This is part of a speech made by President Barrack Obama after the Supreme Court passed the decision on marriage equality on June 26, 2015. In the past 30 plus years, marriage equality has been a constant issue that we cannot avoid. It is an issue that is often on the news and for some it affects the outcome of their lives. There are always two sides to any debate…
- 1400 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The idea for an equal rights amendment did not come about until the middle part of the twentieth century. An amendment was proposed after World War II in an attempt to gain equality between men and women. Often times, women were viewed as weaker and inferior to the male sex. Women’s rights groups were formed to prevent people from discriminating against women. These groups not only believed that women should be better treated by men, but they believed women should have the same legal opportunities. Also, they believed that gender should not determine a person’s occupation or pay. The Equal Rights Amendment started out as a proposed amendment. This amendment was introduced to congress in 1923 (Suffrage). It was not until about fifty years later, however, that the amendment was approved by the Senate. Following the Senate’s approval, the amendment was sent to the states to be ratified. The amendment ultimately read that sex should not determine the legal rights of both men and women (Women’s Health). As the focus of the women’s movement changed, the way the amendment was worded changed. These changes, however, did not lay out a specific strategy of how the proposed amendment’s ratification would be promoted. As a result, the proposed Equal Rights Amendment was not ratified.…
- 2124 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
What could be more important than the equality of rights for all American citizens? Women have tried without success for 80 years to be acknowledged as equals in our Constitution through an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). Currently there is nothing in the United States Constitution that guarantees a woman the same rights as a man. The only equality women have with men is the right to vote. In order to protect women’s rights on the same level as men, I am in favor of an Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution today.…
- 2322 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
purpose of the ERA was to prohibit any person from acting on this belief. Alice…
- 1127 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays