Preview

How Perspectives on Nuclear Power Differ by Age Groups

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
724 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Perspectives on Nuclear Power Differ by Age Groups
How perspectives on Nuclear Power differ by age groups

Alexandra Coleman
3/3/12
Period 7

Purpose: To determine how nuclear power effect’s the elderly opinion versus the younger age groups.
Hypothesis: I hypothesize the elderly to be more opposed to nuclear energy than the younger generation.



Materials:
Survey Questions
People

Procedure:
Create a survey consisting of 8 questions or more.
Pass out the survey to every 5th person in your local area

Data:
Question 1: How much do you know about nuclear power?


Question 2: Do you think nuclear power should continue to be used in the future?


Question 3: Would you be opposed to a nuclear power plant being put up in your local area?


Question 4: Do you think nuclear power should be used as an alternative source of energy?


Question 5: Do you think nuclear power is more efficient in comparison to other energy-related sources?


Question 6: Do you believe nuclear power is more safe in the United States than other parts of the world?


Question 7: Have recent events concerning nuclear power plants in Japan caused you to become more or less opposed to nuclear power?


Question 8: Are you aware of the nuclear power incidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl?


Processed Data:

 

 











Conclusion:
Overall this survey proved that although more people below the age of 50 are willing to support nuclear power or is comfortable with it being a main energy source, the idea of nuclear power being continued in the future or being used now is mostly opposed by both ages below and above 50. So in the end my hypothesis proved false because both age groups have similar outlooks on nuclear power.

Analysis:
I hypothesized that people over the age of 50 would more opposed to nuclear power rather than people below the age of 50 because they would less

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eart Science Review

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Suppose an electric-generating power plant is about to be built near your house. The local government has not decided whether to allow coal, nuclear, or oil as fuel for the plant (natural gas is not an option). Some groups argue coal is the best choice because there is a 200-year supply and using coal reduces our dependence on foreign oil. Critics argue that burning coal produces three times more global-warming gasses than oil. Coal also produces more dust and expels more acid-rain-causing gases than oil. Others argue that nuclear-generated power produces no greenhouse gases and no other atmospheric pollution. Critics argue that there is presently no long-term location to store the radioactive waste that will be generated and question the safety of nuclear power. Over the life of the plant, nuclear is the least expensive option, followed by coal and then oil.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last question was, “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when discussing nuclear energy?” The most notable response was Chernobyl. This is very common of people to think about when pondering nuclear energy. This is the most documented and historical significant nuclear plant disaster.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason I oppose is that nuclear reactor is inherently unsafe to human life. The accidents happened in Chernobyl and Fukushima has shown us apparently that nuclear meltdowns and explosions can occur at any time without any omen. Not only did the accidents bring destructive damage to the buildings or any infrastructure in the cities, but also caused hundreds and thousands of casualties. Despite the high technology and secure safety system implemented in the nuclear plant, and despite many scientists and professors claimed the percentage of not getting explosion is up to 90%, accidents can still happen and result in disastrous outcome. Frankly no one can afford the outcome and dare to say it is impossible for that 10% to occur. The most recent disaster in Fukushima once again alerts people from all around the world. As the communication media is well established nowadays, people in every corner of the world can watch this disaster---nuclear leakage and explosions on live through television or Internet. “Current nuclear power plants are no longer safe!” Many communities from different countries…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power In Australia

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This report will therefore create an argument for or against the uses of nuclear energy.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power- Ethics Study

    • 42811 Words
    • 172 Pages

    Report consists of 98 pages in total, including the Executive Summary , Bibliography and Addendas.…

    • 42811 Words
    • 172 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a commodity like electricity becomes easily accessible, how it operates can be overlooked. We don’t have to know how it works as long as it works. Nuclear energy powers twenty percent of world energy needs, but is it really worth it? Is the energy worth it for disasters like Chernobyl or Fukushima? I believe that it’s not. Nuclear energy should not be utilized due to issues like radioactive water and radioactive waste.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that "Nuclear energy is NOT the best way to meet the ever-increasing energy needs of the planet." We would like to define the term the energy needs, and in this debate it will only apply to the electricity energy needs of the planet. There are four main arguments that we would like to state.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only two major accidents evolving nuclear power plants were in Chernobyl, Ukraine and Fukushima, Japan. A fluke earthquake followed by a tsunami caused the Fukushima leak, in which the waves crashed against a nuclear facility and disable the systems used to cool the nuclear fuel. Zero deaths have resulted from the accident because the Japanese government responded rapidly in evacuating people and stopping food shipments immediately, things the Soviet government did not do after Chernobyl. Fukushima is a perfect example of when a fluke accident causing a nuclear leak the proper response can stop a disaster. The other incidence, Chernobyl, was caused by human error and an improper response by the Soviet government. The operators ran the nuclear power plant at a very low power, without following safety precautions and alerting the safety personal, which caused the power surge that started a fire. The fire burned, while releasing radiation into the atmosphere, for ten days. The Chernobyl power plant also did not have a containment structure, which would have contained most of the radioactive material, like most other nuclear power plants. Also, the Soviet government did not stop the shipment of food containing radioiodine immediately. This caused a increased amount of thyroid cancer, which has lead to the deaths of fifteen children from the Chernobyl…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Obama has stated that the United States should increase the use of nuclear power. As there are many ways to retrieve energy, one needs to think of the disadvantages/advantages of each side.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 9000-33000 innocent people died as a result of the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in Russia in 1986- the deadliest nuclear accident to date! Since the inception of nuclear energy, a sense of danger has always been inherent due to the extremely radioactive nature of uranium which if emitted, hangs over the land as the fog cloaks the English moors. When the human body is exposed to high levels of radioactivity, deformities can form, and the rate of cancer increases dramatically. Because of the imminent hazard regarding nuclear energy, politicians and scientists alike have debated whether to increase or decrease funding for the research and development of nuclear reactor programs.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CAE Writing help - essay

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fossil fuel energy sources, such as oil and coal, are often labeled as bad for the environment, and as unsuitable for long-term energy supplies. The current debate centers on whether to replace fossil fuels with nuclear energy, or with non-nuclear alternatives, such as solar power and wind power. In your opinion, should governments encourage nuclear or non-nuclear energy sources? Give reasons to support your views.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    nuclear power

    • 3624 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Social benefits are seen in nuclear power by improved safety compared to coal power plants and to reduce deaths caused by fossil fuel power pollution. For example, Patrick Moore 's article states "the multiagency U.N. Chernobyl form reported last year that 56 deaths could be directly attributed to the accident, most of those from radiation are burns suffered while fighting the fire. Tragic as those steps were, they pale in comparison to the more than 5000 coal mining deaths that occur worldwide every year. No one has died of a radiation related incident in history of the U.S. civilian reactor program." (Moore, 2006, para 11) What we can take from this qoute is that the number of deaths caused by coal production and power is significantly larger than even the most significant nuclear disaster to date, showing that annually 5000 people to lose their lives from mining…

    • 3624 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is true that many people have varying opinions about having nuclear power plants and developing nuclear energy. I, myself, see it as a good alternative source of energy while my brother sees it as a weapon for mass destruction.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays