Preview

Environmental Effects Of Poaching On The Environment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1868 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Environmental Effects Of Poaching On The Environment
Effects of Poaching on Animals, Environment, and Communities
Levi J. Stoesz
Mountain Lake Christian

Abstract Numerous research has been conducted on the effects of Poaching, and this paper will analyze these findings. Poaching negatively affects the communities, animals, and the environment. Research shows that poaching has dramatically increased over the previous decades and will continue to increase in the years to come. Poaching has the ability to destroy communities, cause extinction in animals species, and devastate environments. Communities are at risk of falling apart, because of the side effects of poaching. Countless animals have been killed, and the killing will continue to increase until something is done to stop it. And poaching
…show more content…
The extinction caused by poaching can have a negative effect on the economy of local communities tourism industry, as stated by Estrada (2014), an environmental writer for One Green Planet. If people go on a tour to see elephants, but no elephants are left to be seen, people will stop going on these tours and potentially people might stop visiting these places. Estrada (2014), explained “Furthermore, a tourist boycott due to local poaching is a real threat. A boycott could have a detrimental effect on a community’s economy since restaurants, hotels, rentals, and other attractions would suffer” (para. 4). If poaching is not stopped, it could damage the vitality of local communities. Along with having an impact on the overall health of a community, poaching also poses a threat to the humans …show more content…
“Once the number of sharks in certain regions have been diminished enough to significantly minimize their presence, the populations of their prey dramatically increase, as can be observed by rapidly increasing populations of skates and rays…” (para.14). The online news story reported from Record, continued, saying, “which in turn eventually exhaust much of their own food supply, resulting in the degradation of their ecosystem.” (para. 14). Just like the tigers, the poaching of the sharks allowed smaller prey to increase in population which led to a decline in their food supply. Both the tiger and the shark are vital to their environments, and poaching causes a negative imbalance that could potentially lead to its downfall. Along with poaching destroying environments, it also has a negative effect on the animals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Double Language Analysis

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Forsythe attempts to magnify the size of the issue by suggesting that the only solution to solving the number of attacks is to kill a number of sharks reducing the species population. He uses statistics of “seven attacks in the last 4 years” to encourage the reader’s support. This positions the reader to view the writer’s argument as more convincing because it appears to be objective and reliable.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the 1970’s when the movie Jaws first showed up on big screens around the country, people have been afraid of beaches, in fear of shark attacks. Not only have they been apprehensive about swimming in the ocean, but some have such malicious feelings towards sharks (especially Atlantic White Sharks due to their role in the movie) that they have taken to hunting and killing this already dwindling species. (Earth Island Institute) It is no secret that pollution and overfishing, as well as numerous other factors have caused the biodiversity of marine life to drastically decrease. It is also known that the ocean ecosystem relies much on all members of the food chain- particularly top predators like sharks. Larger sharks,…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The shark is known to be a terror of the ocean that does nothing more than kill human’s, at least this is what was think of these creatures until more research was discovered. The truth is that the shark is a beautiful creature that has more than 440 species that is being hunted to extinction. Not many people are killed by sharks, as it is more common to be killed by a vending machine, than a shark. These creatures do not need to be hunted, as they are already on the verge of extinction.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because of poaching, animals of the rainforest are becoming endangered which disrupts the food chain…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people aren’t sacred to enter the territory of sharks and their environment. A number of Australian’s oppose the culling of sharks and do not fear of getting back into the ocean. Miranda Devine published an opinion piece with the headline “A tasty dish for a very big fish… and it’s all our fault” in The Daily Telegraph newsletter on February 12th, 2014 with the contention that it is our fault that we have become part of shark’s food chain. This is directed to the people that do not support the culling with a very direct tone.…

    • 930 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shark Cull Oral

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Shark are a predator in the ocean and the potential risks of being attacked by them are known but is killing them really the best solution? Scientist from all over Australia, as well as Marine Life Advocates have been trying to drill in to Barnett that there are better solutions available, and that killing them will have no impact on decreasing the fatal attacks. (Why barrnets doing it, his thoughts behind it)…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of the rare species being poached by Transnational Organized Crime groups are endanger of being wiped off the face of the planet forever. Government corruption, weak laws, and next to no punishment for poaching allows for these crimes to continue around the world. For Crime groups the risk is low and rewards are high, especially when the poachers are poor locals, which are typically the persons jailed for the offenses. Poachers do many things to an environment when they over harvest plants and animals that can have divesting impacts across that area. The altering of livelihoods of the locals who can depend on the plants and animals poached for their own survival where they live. The poaching can have massive effects on other species that live and breathe in those eco-systems which in turn can have wider effects on nature. The introduction of wildlife into an eco-system can be invasive toward other species. “For example pet Burmese pythons let loose by their owners are now considered a major pest in Florida’s everglades.” (2015). And lastly, the killing of other species, incidentally, while targeting endangered species can affect…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do you feel about lions? Do you want them to be extinct? If we continue this type of hunting, every lion that you have ever seen will be gone. Also, this includes tigers, elephants, rhinos, and many more. Big Game Trophy Hunting is a danger to the environment due to population. You might say “Hunting provides food for us,” or “This helps keep the populations under control.” All of this might be true, but populations would even rise more if we kept…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The downfall to poaching is that it could cause hunting to be banned and this will lower the rate of outdoorsmen. This means that all the men and women that usually buy their hunting license would not buy their hunting license anymore. The result of the rate of people buying hunting license dropping would be that the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife would be losing money. If the Wildlife department loses money this could result in several animal parks and hunting places being shut down.The banning of hunting could be both good and bad for the people. In (Kentucky white Tailed Deer Report) they state that the banning of hunting could be good for the people because this would make the serious hunters want to help catch people that are poaching and report them to the fish and wildlife department.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharks have always been an important part of Earth. Many cultures - beyond just the Chinese with their famous shark fin soup - consider them to be powerful symbols, deities, or sacred animals. They help keep the ecosystem in check. This, in turn, highly benefits the economy. It’s difficult to imagine a world without sharks - considering that sharks have existed for over 400 million years (What If There Were No Sharks?). This makes them approximately three million eight hundred years older than us. Unfortunately, with the rise of anti-shark movies such as Jaws, people have begun to fear sharks. Many of them wish to kill them, and will not mourn their loss. However, if one looks deeper into this solution, one will discover a myriad of problems. Problems which are guaranteed to occur if shark culling is continued. If the ocean is to be saved and humans are to be kept safe, an environmentally safe alternative to shark culling must be discovered.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals like the South African Elephant have been hunted to endangerment in pursuit of their ivory. What would happen to the environment if they were eliminated? Although true, affecting one member of an ecosystem is known to have drastic effects on the wellbeing of all members of the ecosystem, it is our obligation as a species to maintain the wellbeing of our own species first.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharks need protection because they are slowly being decimated. The evidence shown in this article is very clear. For example, there are only 36 Goblin sharks in existence. That number could decrease very quickly if people keep hunting sharks. Many people believe that most/all sharks are dangerous, which isn’t necessarily true. Scientists don’t know exactly why sharks attack humans, but usually it’s only a single bite, and only 22 to 25 reportings happen in a year. The reason why we need sharks is somewhat simple. Killing off sharks would put the ocean ecosystem in great imbalance. Without sharks, there would be too many fish and other aquatic creatures in the ocean. If we attempt to kill off the sharks, so many things could go wrong, considering…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many majestic animals have been the targets for poachers, and poachers, being the dumb people they are, don’t know the difference between animals they can and can’t hunt, and end up making them extinct! Hunting is interfering with nature, and at this rate, we will continue to make many species extinct! Some may see hunting as a way of removing overpopulated animals, but there are none of those right now! Hunting not only hurts animals, but it will end up hurting ourselves as well!…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main problems with the shark culling program is that sharks sit at the top of the marine food pyramid, meaning they are predators. I am not the only one who…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”("Threats to African Elephants." WWF Conserves Our Planet, Habitats, & Species like the Panda. May. 22, 2016). “All over the world there are over 100 million sharks being slaughtered by humans yet we depict them as vicious and blood-thirsty killers. These species are being slaughtered for shark liver oil and for shark cartilage for pseudo cancer cures.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays