Preview

Enlightened Absolutism Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1508 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enlightened Absolutism Analysis
Enlightened absolutism was not a contemporary term to the European rulers it now describes. Consequently, interpretations of enlightened absolutists vary and are dependent on the time of analysis. The term was developed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and since then its interpretation has evolved. The idea of enlightened absolutism, however, was observed and the principles were familiar in the second half of the eighteenth century among certain rulers. At first, the term was only applied to German speaking lands, but has since expanded geographically and to include French and Italian Enlightenment philosophy as well as German cameralism in its influences. The perceived benefits and faults of this style of ruling have transformed …show more content…
There certainly are factors of her policies and the general progress of Russia that negate the idea of her as an enlightened, rational, and caring monarch, but these negatives become understandable when viewed in context. Fundamentally, Catherine the Great ruled with the principles of the Enlightenment in mind and fulfills the basic definition of enlightened absolutism, at least in intention. However, she was not completely successful in execution. This nonetheless does not ruin her reputation as an enlightened absolutist and rather makes her more typical of her contemporaries. Catherine II’s policies and government endeavoured to improve the lives of Russians, believing this would further solidify her power. In essence, this is the guiding principle of enlightened absolutism and thusly Catherine II of Russia clearly solidifies herself as an enlightened absolutist. Her Russia was more liberal and enlightened than ever before, and arguably ever since. Her failures to follow enlightenment principles fully can be explained by a traditional outlook on foreign policy, advisors’ resistance to such radical ideas, and a fear of losing power. Above all, Catherine the Great was personally extremely “enlightened” given the historical context of her reign and this reflects itself in her earlier actions as empress and in her …show more content…
When Catherine II came to power, there were no institutional limits on the power of the ruler, no intermediate bodies as seen in the rest of Europe. Russia’s society was highly regulated and restrictive, while its government was lacking and negligent. The idea of a free citizen did not exist. With the second highest population in Europe, Russia was made up of millions of peasants and a small minority of nobility. Even the nobility was owned, in a sense, by the state. Until 1762, nobles were bound to serve the state in either the military or in civil service for twenty-five years or more. There was also a class of townsmen, registered in their town, collectively responsible for a series of unpaid tasks and the collection of a tax. The social institutions of Russia were extremely deep rooted and dissimilar to those in Western Europe; Catherine’s reforms to social structure would have to combat this severe system in a way other rulers would not need. It would be impossible to reform government because the structure of Russia was not able to handle internal administration as is. There were no established corporate structures, no noble assemblies, and no urban corporations, to which internal administration could be trusted. Catherine’s reforms began with organising and giving legal form and rights to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was absolutism a period of prosperity or tyranny in Europe during the 16th and 17th…

    • 709 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Alexander II became the Tsar, Russia was in total disarray. Her once widely respected and feared army was humiliated on the battlefields in the Crimean Peninsula, 80% of the people were in poverty and illiterate. Russia was still stuck in the middle ages while the rest of Europe was steaming in through the Industrial Era. Alexander II saw this as a need for change, primarily in response to the Crimean War, however to be able to do this, he also had to change the Russian society, therefore in 1861 he abolished serfdom, becoming the most significant events in Imperial Russian history, giving him the name as the ‘Tsar Liberator’ (Watts, Peter, History Review, 2014). However, although Alexander II’s reforms did pave the way for a more educated,…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 16th and 17th centuries, many European nations grew into the mold of absolutism. Starting with the role of James I, England underwent absolutist reforms as Parliament was often suppressed by the ruling monarch until the Glorious Revolution, when the supremacy of Parliament was established.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ on Absolutism

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European monarchs in the seventeenth and eighteenth century viewed themselves as absolute rulers, or kings and queens that believed that they controlled everything within their state's borders. The people that were ruled by the absolute rulers believed absolutism had a different aspect than was being used by the kings and queens. This practice is known as absolutism. The people that were being ruled and the ruler or absolute monarch viewed the role of the absolute ruler differently.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many rulers used absolutism in their countries. They believed rulers should have complete control over the country. Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be feared and thought that the only way people would listen to him was if he was mean and scary. He thought if he was nice and loved then they would not fear him and end up taking advantage of him. (doc1) King James also believed absolutism was the way to go. He believed in divine right and that it was the only way to keep the country in order. He thought that kings were like gods and had the power to create or destroy anything that they thought was ineffective.(doc 2) Another person who believed in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He believed that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He said that to escape the brutish life people entered into a social contract which was an agreement by which they gave up the state of nature for an organized society. He also supported the Stuart kings in their struggle against parliament.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment is touted by modern historians as a time of intellectual and social advancement, an era of optimism and freedom unheard of in earlier times. The era of absolutism is seen as a time of mounting liberty that contributed to the rise of democracy in the Americas and elsewhere. In reality, the "Enlightened Despotism" of the absolutist leaders was more in keeping with the tyrannical rulers of the pre-reformation Holy Roman Empire than with the democratic republic of modern America. Three of the most prominent absolutist leaders were Catherine the Great of Russia, Frederick the Great of Prussia and Louis XIV of France - these three leaders are perfect examples of the avarice, tyranny and lust for power that characterizes the Enlightened Despots.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many places that were enlightened during around the Enlightened Age were actually absolute monarchs. The question here is where these monarchs lead by truly enlightened leaders or were they just using a scheme to promote themselves and to keep their positions. It is hard to tell which Catherine the Great is. To find out, you must look at her personality, situation, foreign policies, and economical, social, and political domestic policies. By looking at these, you can see she was, for the most part, enlightened to her in her reign of power and to gain support.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism DBQ

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two main forms of government. The two main forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these types of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism was the most effective type of government during that time period. Absolutism is when the ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people of their nation. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them instead of a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Reveiw

    • 4158 Words
    • 17 Pages

    a. Thesis: Rise of absolutism came at the expense of the medieval church, absolutism laid the foundation for the modern-nation state.…

    • 4158 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Golden Age of Russian History was lead by one of the country’s most notable rulers- Empress Catherine II, also known as Catherine the Great of Russia. The most powerful empress the nation has ever seen, the events leading up to her long reign (1762- 1796) were dramatic and unlikely. Born a German princess, Catherine was brought to Russia as an adolescent to marry Peter III, the heir to the throne after Empress Elizabeth. Catherine quickly won over the favor of the nation by adopting their religion, embracing their language and culture, and taking on a Russian Orthodox name. When Empress Elizabeth died, Peter ascended to the throne and took control of Russia. However, neither the nation nor Catherine liked him, and Catherine…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Powerful Women

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Two of the most powerful women of this era were Queen Elizabeth the first of England and Catherine the Great of Russia. These women had a difficult time gaining their power, and were faced with many adversaries, but, they overcame them and rose to the top. Catherine the Great of Russia started out as the empress consort of Russia, married to the emperor, which is not a bad title, but she did not have complete power and being Empress Consort did not make her famous. Although she was married to the emperor, it was not a happy marriage, he was mad and had fits of rages and was very gullible. She gave birth to his child, but was led to believe that this child was not his, and sent Catherine away. While she was by herself, she came into contact with several groups that were opposed to her husband’s ruling. After Peter became Emperor, she started conspiring to take the throne for herself. When she learned that the Emperor had arrested her co-conspirators, she took matters into her own hands and accelerated the process, delivering a speech to the soldiers to protect her and keep her safe from her husband. She also had members of the clergy ready to ordain her as the sole occupant of the Russian throne. Once that was done, she had her husband arrested, forced him to sign a document of abdication, which left her as the next in line for the throne, and imprisoned him. The change that came over Russia was legendary. Under the new empress’s rule, Russia expanded to cover New Russia, Crimea, Northern Caucasus, Rightbank Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, and Courland at the expense, mainly, of two powers – the Ottoman Empire and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. All told, she added some 200,000 square miles to Russian…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Borrowing heavily from the Byzantine Empire, Kievan Rus ' developed a principality incorporating loosely organized alliances with regional landed aristocrats, or boyars. The major princes were attracted to the concept of a central ruler who possessed wide powers, and therefore the boyars did not have a significant role in politics. When the Mongols arrived in 1220, Russia had been divided into numerous small kingdoms. The Russian princes, such as Vladimir, possessed most of the power, yet the boyars influence in politics began to increase as they gained more power over the peasantry. As a vassal to the Golden Horde, Russia payed tribute to the Mongols in order to retain their original political structure. The tribute payment required placed a heavy burden on the peasants, causing a system of manorialism to develop, increasing the power of the boyars over the peasantry. With the Russian Empire under Catherine the Great, the common structure of the government was autocratic. Catherine the Great further increased the power of the boyars over the peasantry, allowing them greater control in politics. Gradually transforming from a monarchy to an autocracy, the boyars political influence slowly increased as well. Since Russia was based heavily on its exportation of…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In accessing the actual "greatness" attributed to Catherine the Great, Empress of Russia during the European Enlightenment, one must look at all aspects of her rule. Her outgoing personality left her to be described as anything from "terrible" to "great". She could be deceptive yet honest, humorous yet firm, and light-hearted yet wise. Thus the Enlightenment would not have been a part of Russian history if not for the determination of Catherine the Great. Catherine the Great's exceptional character and illuminating visions brought Russia into the age of enlightenment.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics