Preview

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in India

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in India
Project: Legal Aspects of Business

Enforcement of Foreign Judgements

GROUP 10, SECTION D
ABIN JOY (10P185)
DEEPAK BHATIA (10P197)
HARPREET SINGH (10P200)
JANAK RAJPUROHIT (10P202)
ROHITH POTTI (10P227)
SAKSHI SHARMA (10P229)
Contents

1. Introduction: Enforcement of Foreign Judgements 3 2. Enforcement of Foreign Judgements in India 5 3. The Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Bare Act Indian Law a. Section 44A 6 b. Concept of Res Judicata 7 c. Section 13 8 d. Section 11 8 e. Section 14 9 4. Judgements passed by the Indian Courts regarding enforcement of foreign judgements 10 5. References 12

Introduction
The enforcement of foreign judgments is the recognition and enforcement in one jurisdiction of judgments rendered in another ("foreign") jurisdiction. Foreign judgments may be recognized based on bilateral or multilateral treaties or understandings, or unilaterally without an express international agreement.
The "recognition" of a foreign judgment occurs when the court of one country or jurisdiction accepts a judicial decision made by the courts of another country or jurisdiction, and issues a judgment in substantially identical terms without rehearing the substance of the original lawsuit.
Upon recognition by the court, the party which was successful can subsequently seek its enforcement in the recognizing country.
For instance, if the foreign judgment is a money judgment and the debtor has assets in the recognizing jurisdiction, the judgment creditor has access to all the enforcement remedies as if the case had originated in the recognizing country.
The court may order for, say, garnishment; where the third party which otherwise owes money to the defendant may be asked to directly pay the plaintiff. Another example may be where the court orders



References: Vijay Kumar Dungarwal-Enforcement of Foreign Judgement and Foreign Arbitral Awards in India Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi- Legality of Foreign Judgements in India Rishi Agrawala- Executability and Enforceability of Foreign Judgements and Decrees in India: Judicial Trends Ramni Taneja-Conflict Of Laws: An Overview Of Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments And Foreign Awards In India

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A court is required to use long-arm jurisdiction over persons and businesses in another State when a civil wrong is committed within a State; when there is a contract in the State or a contract affects the State and when a business is transacted that allegedly cause injury to another person. “long arm jurisdiction is a statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over foreign ("foreign" meaning out-of-state) defendants. A state's ability to confer jurisdiction is limited by the Constitution. This jurisdiction permits a court to hear a case against a defendant and enter a binding judgment against a defendant…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to international law there are two form of law, in which they both have a legal dispute when it is brought by individual countries; the two may give an advisory opinion on any legal question that is referred to it by authorized international agencies.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BLTE 10e AM Ch03

    • 3437 Words
    • 11 Pages

    To hear a case, a court must have jurisdiction over the person against whom the suit is brought or over the property involved in the suit. The court must also have jurisdiction over the subject matter. Generally, courts apply a “sliding-scale” stan­dard to determine when it is proper to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant whose only connection with the jurisdiction is the Internet.…

    • 3437 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pol 103 Study Guide

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Unilateral Determination- a call coming from another state informing them that another state has violated international law.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alien Tort Statute (ATS)

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court has since stated that the ATS provides “a cause of action for [a] modest number of international law violations.” To discern if a modern offense also violates the law of nations, which is also known as customary international law, courts will examine whether the offense “rest[s] on a norm of international character accepted by the civilized world and defined with specificity comparable to the features of the 18th century paradigms.” Further, a customary norm should be “specific, universal, and…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, due to the same doctrine of two sovereigns, the prosecution authorities of two different states have the right to prosecute a person to criminal liability for the same act committed by…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Existence of Jurisdiction. Whether there is jurisdiction in either or both of the courts. Federal jurisdiction requires either a federal question and sometime a minimum dollar amount at issue or that there by "diversity of citizenship" and a minimum dollar amount at issue. "Diversity jurisdiction" requires that none of the plaintiffs come from any of the state from which the defendants come (and there is a "double diversity test" if a corporation is involved, with the corporation's state being both the state of incorporation and the state…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rueters, T. (2013). Personal jurisdiction: how to determine where a person can be sued. Retrieved…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear a case. For example federal court hears federal laws, where a state court hears states laws and a civil court hears civil cases. State courts would never hear federal issues because of jurisdiction(Miller & Jentz, 2010).…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When resolving legal disputes in international transactions, the issues involved should include international arbitration. International laws and cultural differences vary so there is an importance for a reputable third…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the issues that are involved in resolving legal disputes in international transactions would be lack of knowledge of the other countries laws, and government interference when it comes to the ruling of the courts. A business would also have to obtain knowledge about a country where they wish to conduct business.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    State A sues State B in International Court of Justice (ICJ), the court hands down a judgment that is adverse to…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the judgements are taken using facts that are proven and explained establishing a LAW that can't be violated . for example…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. AIR 1994 SC 860, this Court considered Section 7(1) of the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 which inter alia provided that a foreign award may not be enforced under the said Act, if the Court dealing with the case is satisfied that the enforcement of the award will be contrary to the Public Policy. After elaborate discussion, the Court arrived at the conclusion that Public Policy comprehended in Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 is the 'Public Policy of India' and does not cover the public policy of any other country. For giving meaning to the term 'Public Policy', the Court observed thus:-- "66. Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention of 1958 and Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards Act do not postulate refusal of recognition and enforcement of a foreign award on the ground that it is contrary to the law of the country of enforcement and the ground of challenge is confined to the recognition and enforcement being contrary to the public policy of the country in which the award is set to be enforced. There is nothing to indicate that the expression "public policy" in Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention and Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards Act is not used in the same sense in which it was used in Article I(c) of the Geneva Convention of 1927 and Section 7(1) of the Protocol and Convention Act of 1937. This would mean that "public policy" in Section 7(1)(b)(ii) has been used in a narrower sense and in order to attract to bar of public policy the enforcement of the award must invoke something more than the violation of the law of India. Since the Foreign Awards Act is concerned with recognition and enforcement of foreign awards which are governed by the principles of private international law, the expression "public policy" in Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards Act must necessarily…

    • 920 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics