There are many things within a quickly aging school of 28 years that are becoming startlingly inefficient compared to the many advancements in technology of the modern day. One of the most wasteful parts of the school are its energy consuming lights, specifically the ones that inhabit the gymnasium and parking lot. These lights, on average, make up almost 27% of the energy consumed by the school. They are largely inept, and need to be addressed as a serious problem in the schools budget. Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) use much less energy than the current lights. The efficiency of LEDs, the money they would save, and how plausible they are to implement into the school make them a valid choice for the school to consider.
“Technology has advanced more in the last thirty years than in the previous two thousand. The exponential increase in advancement will only continue,” said a man named Niels Bohr. The quickening pace of these progressions is has led to the advancements in LED technology. People once thought that the intriguing sodium light bulbs were the best of the business. A few years ago came the energy efficient and eco-friendly fluorescent light bulbs. Technology has now gifted us with the brightest and the most proficient of all the light sources to this age. LEDs utilize energy in a way that the fluorescent, incandescent, and sodium bulbs before it could not achieve. LEDs get approximately twice as many lumens per watt as sodium lights. In other words, LEDs get twice as much light power per watt of power being used. This makes them much more efficient, and a better energy choice. LEDs also last on average 60,000 hours per bulb, while sodium bulbs have a lifespan of 20,000 to 30,000 hours. The lights that are used in the gym, as well as in the parking lots, require a warm up period and can be very inconvenient, as well as taxing on energy consumption. LEDs require very little, if any startup time, and do not require the same amount of energy to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document