Preview

Enbridge

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3074 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enbridge
Position Paper for
Environmentalists Non-Government Organizations on
Enbridge’s Northern Gateway Project

Overview

Enbridge is Canada’s largest natural gas distribution company. Founded 61 years ago, it is the single largest transporter of crude oil and petroleum products in North America. On May 27, 2010, Enbridge submitted a regulatory application for a $5.5 billion project named Northern Gateway Project (NGP). This pipeline project consists of a twin pipeline system transporting petroleum and condensate from Bruderheim, Alberta, near Edmonton, to the marine terminals in Kitimat, British Columbia. Crude oil or petroleum is used to make gasoline, lubricants for machinery, asphalt, plastics, and many others everyday necessities. Condensate is a chemical and petroleum mixture used to dilute tar sands crude oil for easier pipeline transport. The eastbound pipeline is projected to be 36” in diameter and 1,177km in length, and will deliver 525,000 barrels of oil per day from Bruderheim to Kitimat. The westbound pipeline, the same length as the eastbound pipeline, is to be 20” in diameter, and it will transport 193,000 barrels of condensate per day from Kitimat to Bruderheim (Enbridge, 2011b). This project is currently undergoing a comprehensive and rigorous regulatory review to weigh the stakeholders’ interest regarding the adverse effects on the environment. By the end of 2013, the Joint Review Panel (JRP) will determine whether or not to permit Enbridge to carry out the project.

Key Stakeholders & Their Positions on NGP

The NGP has a diversified group of stakeholders. Amongst them, some of the major players are - in no specific order and not limited to - Enbridge, China(Sinopec), the Canadian government, Aboriginals, and environmental advocates.

Enbridge
Enbridge, the project proponent, want to see it happen. It claims that the pipeline will strengthen the nation’s position as a global energy producer, build global alliances, and facilitate
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Study: The Keystone Pipeline Debate
    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Case Study: The Keystone Pipeline Debate

    The Keystone Pipeline System is an oil pipeline system in Canada and the United States, commissioned since 2010. It runs from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in Alberta to refineries in Illinois and Texas, and also to oil tank farms and oil pipeline distribution center in Cushing, Oklahoma. Three phases of the project are in operation, while a fourth phase is awaiting United States government approval.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: The Keystone Pipeline
    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case Study: The Keystone Pipeline

    (H)The proposal failed because of the bad environmental effects so the Obama Administration as well as the EPA disapproved it. They felt that the negative environmental effects outweighed the positives. (I)Some of the environmental agencies that are responsible for approving the extension are TransCanada, the Senate Energy Committee, and some Obama lobbying groups but Obama and the EPA needed to approve it for it to be passed. Although, all other three phases of the Keystone pipeline have been approved are almost completed so the pipeline is considered a success…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Keystone Xl Pipeline
    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Keystone Xl Pipeline

    The Keystone XL pipeline is a possible opportunity for the United States to bring oil to the country without relying on the Middle Eastern countries. The construction of this pipeline would be in response to strong demand of crude oil in out Gulf Coast region, as a result of declining oil feeds from foreign countries. The process of approving the pipeline, beginning in 2008, has been very controversial. Those who approve of the pipeline tend to focus on its economic benefits, while those who oppose it are focusing on the ways it can be detrimental to our environment. TransCanada is the corporation who wants to build the pipeline, they are resposible for building and developing safe energy infrastructires thorughout North America. In addition to importing crude oil from Canada, TransCanada believes, “the Keystone XL Pipeline will also support the significant growth of crude oil production in the United States from producers in the Bakken region of Montana and North Dakota” (“About the”). The process for constructing this pipeline has been a long road, for both sides of the issue. The application was first submitted and…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Alberta Tar Sands Sustainability Report
    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alberta Tar Sands Sustainability Report

    The development of the tar sands project against the purpose of harness private interest to serve the public interest. The term “Public” contains two aspects: the public human aspect and the public environment aspect. First of all, the booming economies of the developing countries and the obsessive oil needs of the developed countries have triggered massive oil sand exploitation in countries like Canada. Pipeline transport companies like Keystone and Enbridge captures this opportunity to make financial growth. Instead of harness private interest to serve public interest, these companies embrace their private interest and ignore the public interests. While…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    An Argumentative Essay Regarding the building of the Keystone pipeline
    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages

    An Argumentative Essay Regarding the building of the Keystone pipeline

    With an increasing global population and ever industrializing society 's, environmental concern is rarely given priority over economic incentive. But what people fail to realize is that our environmental failures, and relative apathy about it set up a plethora of problems for future generations to deal with. One of the most important decisions president Obama will face in the next year will be whether or not to approve the building of the Keystone XL pipeline, a massively sized, and massively controversial oil pipeline that would stretch all the way from Alberta Canada, to American oil refineries along the Gulf Of Mexico. Despite the economic incentive present, the building of the Keystone XL pipeline should not happen because of the environmental risks posed, and the fact that it bolsters our dependence on fossil fuels.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons
    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons

    These arguments in favor of construction and operation of the pipeline are decreased gas prices, stronger national security through reduced foreign oil import dependence, and creation of jobs. In the United States, oil supplies 36 percent of our energy sources and is all so the principal fuel for transportation around the world. Oil in particular fuels around ninety-four percent of our nation’s transportation sector (Petroleum & Other Liquids, 2013). This makes oil an important commodity to many nations including our own and the market for oil very competitive between nations as they seek to compete over oil exporters and nations with convenient access to oil reap the economic benefits. Therefore, the pricing of crude oil is controlled by multiple factors; supply, demand, markets, accessibility, and physical balancing. Although the United States holds position as a major consumer of oil, our nation solely alone as minute effects on crude oil cost, even for refineries in our own country. According to an academic journal by Edwin Slade titled, The Keystone Pipeline Addition: Assessing the Potential Benefits of Reduced Gasoline Prices and Increased National Security, U.S. refineries’ crude acquisition cost change with geopolitical events, such as increasing oil demands in foreign countries such as China and those in the Middle East. Keystone supporters argue that by making oil transports more available to our country and to the global market, we impact the cost of crude oil in a more effective way that depends heavily on Keystone exports. Benefits of oil availability can be viewed on a local scale primarily in Midwest. Prior to Keystone operation, Canadian oil imports accumulated in Cushing, Oklahoma, since oil refineries and pipelines are centralized in this area, and resulted in an abundance of excess oil known as the Cushing glut. This resulted in increased…

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Keystone Pipeline
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Keystone Pipeline

    The Keystone Pipeline is a system that transports oil from Canada into the U.S. The owner of this Pipeline is TransCanada, who proposed the idea back in October of 2005. However, the construction on the Pipeline didn’t go under way until 2008. It took TransCanada over two years to acquire all the necessary state and federal permits for the pipeline. The pipeline runs for over 2100 miles, through a number of states and provinces throughout the United States and Canada. There is said to be many advantages of having this pipeline; such as an increase in revenue for the U.S. and Canadian economies. It’s supposed to open a countless amount of jobs and is said to have economic and national security advantages. However, many have argued that the pipeline should not exist due to its negative effect on the environment and will reduce our energy security.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Keystone XL Pipeline Case Study
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Keystone XL Pipeline Case Study

    The construction of the Keystone Xl pipeline will be detrimental to the environment because it will disperse greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the extraction of tar sand. The tar sands oil production has higher levels of carbon dioxide emissions than that of conventional oil. Burning the tar sand oil will increase the earth temperature, resulting in powerful storms such as hurricanes and tornadoes. This kind of pollution will have detrimental effects on our eco system, from potential oil spill or even worse a catastrophic explosion. The release of harmful toxins into earth environment can increase health risks for nature’s inhabitants.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dakota Access Pipeline Argument
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dakota Access Pipeline Argument

    "What You Need to Know About the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest | Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community." Common Dreams, www.commondreams.org /views/2016/09/09/what-you-need-know-about-dakota-access-pipeline-protest. Gail Ablow shares what is happening among the Sioux and the Dakota access pipeline with her personal analysis, to inform individuals what they should know about the event. She clarifies the threats and dangers that the Dakota Access Pipeline can bring to the Sioux Native Indian tribe. Also, the protest between the two and how it’s affecting the state of North Dakota. She also explains about the Dakota Access pipeline and the intentions of it being put in place. She goes into various details about how the pipeline…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    North Dakota Pipeline Research Paper
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    North Dakota Pipeline Research Paper

    The jobs it would possibly bring to Americans and the money to farmers. Energy Transfer said the pipeline would bring an estimated $156 million in sales and income taxes to state and local. Though, far fewer permanent jobs to maintain and monitor the pipeline. State and federal agencies have approved the pipeline, and some farmers and ranchers have welcomed the thousands of dollars in payments that came with signing agreements to allow it to across their land.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    North Dakota Pipeline Pros And Cons
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    North Dakota Pipeline Pros And Cons

    The North Dakota Access Pipeline has been a major topic for national controversy for almost year now. It has sparked a major disagreement between Native Americans and the Government. Is this perhaps another treaty that has been broken? The North Dakota Access Pipeline is a $3.7 billion project constructed by the Texas-Based Energy Transfer Partners. Ir. Although it is said to be the safest and most efficient way to transport crude oil many Native Americans still have many concerns regarding the project and the environment. Granting that the North Dakota Access Pipeline may hold potential benefits such as jobs, resources and revenue; the apparent possibility of land invasion, oil spills/leaks, and environmental impact still outweigh the bad.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons

    The Keystone Pipeline, also known as Keystone XL, is a 1,179-mile-long pipeline from oil fields in Western Canada to the Midwestern United States. Specifically, this pipeline will extend from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska with plans to link to an existing pipeline that reaches to the Gulf Coast. Despite the advantages this pipeline will produce, it will also create various negative effects regarding wildlife and inhabitants of these areas, economic and political issues, as well as challenge government policies and regulations.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Energy East Pipeline
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Energy East Pipeline

    The Energy East pipeline came onto the federal government agenda as with the creation of the pipeline, it would potentially create 14,000 full-time jobs, 55 billion dollars boost to Canada’s GDP and would displace 1,500 rail cars daily. https://www.transcanada.com/en/operations/oil-and-liquids/energy-east/). Canada favors the idea of pipelines, to an extent that there have been four pipeline projects proposed all which will carry oil either to British Columbia or expand to the US. (__) Currently, the pipeline industry is fairly large in Canada. According to Alberta’s Oil Sands Discovery Centre Fact Sheet, “approximately 700,000 km of pipelines transport virtually all of Canada’s crude oil and natural gas production to consumers in Canada…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Energy East Pipeline
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of The Energy East Pipeline

    The Energy East Pipeline, if approved, will pump approximately 1.1 million barrels of oil a day, carrying the oil from Alberta and Saskatchewan to the refineries in Eastern Canada. There is always going to be the risk of breakage and leaking, but TransCanada will pay for any maintenance to be done. In spite of that, this will be more environmentally friendly than having it transported by trucks, decreasing the amount of pollution being distributed into the atmosphere, eliminating the amount of greenhouse gases. The construction of the pipeline will create about 14 000 well-paying, direct and indirect jobs. The pipeline will boost and strengthen our economy. Canada will also make 36 billion dollars in precisely 20 years, which could slowly start to bring Canada out of debt.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    PipeLines
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PipeLines

    Enbridge, the world leader in crude oil pipelines, proposed a pipeline running from a tar sand oil plant in Bruderheim, Alberta to Kitimat, British Columbia. If passed, this pipeline will ship hundreds of barrels of oil a day to a port in Kitimat, where the majority will be shipped to Asia. Enbridge claims that there will be large economic benefits (jobs), especially local. However, there a many risks, economical, environmentally, and negative health effects such as weakness, seizures, and possibly cancer.1 Enbridge still hopes to get approval even though there is a wall of opposition, especially from locals. Gil McGowan, President of AFL says “The pipeline will create environmental destruction, take potential upgrading and refining jobs away from Canadians, and put our country's energy security at risk.” 3 The Northern Gateway Pipeline risks greatly outway the benefits. The NGP is too risky and should not be built.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics