Preview

Empowered self-management

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Empowered self-management
The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0048-3486.htm Empowered self-management and the design of work teams

Empowered self-management Richard Cooney
Department of Management, Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia
Keywords Empowerment, Team working, Job design
Abstract This paper explores the theoretical implications of empowered self-management as a teamwork design concept. It explores the multiple definitions of empowerment and self-management that have been used in the design of work teams and it attempts to locate empowered self-management within the relevant traditions of work design. The paper provides a critical appraisal of empowered self-management as a team design concept arguing that its unique contribution to the work design literature, has been the development of concepts that focus upon task enlargement as the basis of enhanced role accountabilities within teams. Empowered self-management as a team design concept has little to say about employee or group autonomy but in fact reflects the design of teams to provide for the normative self-regulation of employees within management directed systems of control.

Introduction
The empowerment of employees to enhance self-management has become a catch cry of modern management. Empowerment is one of those broad ranging management ideas that cover a wide variety of practices that are deployed in a wide variety of contexts. Empowerment has been seen as a property of organizations (Byman, 1991), of organizational teams and groups (Katzenbach and Smith, 1994) as well as a property of individual employees (Ford and Fottler, 1995).
Empowerment has been viewed from many different perspectives and it has drawn upon a variety of sources for both practical and theoretical inspiration. Empowerment has been approached from



References: Adler, P. (1992), “The ‘learning bureaucracy’: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.”, in Cummings, L Adler, P. (1993), “Time-and-motion regained”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 97-108. Adler, P. and Borys, B. (1996), “Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioral change”, Psychological Review, Vol Barker, J. (1993), “Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol Barker, J. (1999), The Discipline of Teamwork: Participation and Concertive Control, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Belbin, M. (1993), Team Roles at Work, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA. Berggren, C. (1994), The Volvo Experience. Alternatives to Lean Production in the Swedish Auto Industry, Macmillan, Basingstoke. Blumberg, M. (1980), “Job switching in autonomous work groups: an exploratory study in a pennsylvania coal mine”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol Bryant, B., Farhy, N. and Griffiths, A. (1994), Self-Managing Teams & Changing Supervisory Roles, Centre For Corporate Change, Sydney. Buchanan, D. (2000), “An eager and enduring embrace: the ongoing rediscovery of teamworking as a management idea”, in Procter, S Byman, W. (1991), Zapp! The Lightening of Empowerment, Century Business, London. Cherns, A. (1976), “The principles of sociotechnical design”, Human Relations, Vol. 29 No. 8, pp Claydon, T. and Doyle, M. (1996), “Trusting me, trusting you? The ethics of employee empowerment”, Personnel Review, Vol Cohen, S., Ledford, G. and Spreitzer, G. (1996), “A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness”, Human Relations, Vol Collins, D. (1999), “Born to fail? Empowerment, ambiguity and set overlap”, Personnel Review, Vol Conger, J. and Kanungo, R. (1988), “The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice”, Academy of Management Review, Vol Cordery, J. (2003), “Team work”, in Holman, D., Wall, T., Sparrow, P. and Howard, A. (Eds), The New Workplace Cummings, T. (1978), “Self-regulating work groups: a socio-technical synthesis”, Academy of Management Review, Vol Cummings, T. and Blumberg, M. (1987), “Advanced manufacturing technology and work design”, in Wall, T., Clegg, C Cunningham, I. and Hyman, J. (1999), “The poverty of empowerment? A critical case study”, Personnel Review, Vol Davis, L. and Wacker, G. (1987), “Job design”, in Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp Dawson, P. and Webb, J. (1989), “New production arrangements: the totally flexible cage”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol Delbridge, R. (1995), “Surviving JIT: control and resistance in a Japanese transplant”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol Dunphy, D. and Bryant, B. (1996), “Teams: panaceas or prescriptions for improved performance?”, Human Relations, Vol Emery, F. (1972), “Characteristics of socio-technical systems”, in Davis, L. and Taylor, J. (Eds), Design of Jobs Ford, R. and Fottler, M. (1995), “Empowerment: a matter of degree”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol Gist, M. (1987), “Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol Gulowsen, J. (1972) Davis, L. and Taylor, J. (Eds), Design of Jobs. Selected Readings, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, pp Guzzo, R. (1996), “Fundamental considerations about work groups”, in West, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp Guzzo, R., Yost, P., Campbell, R. and Shea, G. (1993), “Potency in groups: articulating a construct”, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol Hackman, R. (1986), “The psychology of self-management in organizations”, in Pollack, M. and Perloff, R Herbst, P. (1962), Autonomous Group Functioning. An Exploration in Behaviour Theory and Measurement, Tavistock Publications, London. Jackson, P., Wall, T., Martin, R. and Davids, K. (1993), “New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. (1994), The Wisdom Of Teams. Creating The High-Performance Organization, Harper Business, New York, NY. Kinlaw, D. (1991), Developing Superiour Work Teams. Building Quality and the Competitive Edge, Lexington Books, Lenham, MD. Kirkman, B. and Rosen, B. (1997), “A model of work team empowerment”, in Pasmore, W. and Woodman, R Klein, J. (1991), “A reexamination of autonomy in light of new manufacturing practices”, Human Relations, Vol Lawler, E. (1986), High Involvement Management. Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Lawler, E., Mohrman, S. and Ledford, G. (1995), Creating High Performance Organizations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4. True or False? On self-managed work teams, each member learns one specific job and has clearly defined responsibilities.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rl Wolfe Plant

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Introduction: John Amasi was the Director of RL Wolfe’s of production and Engineering. This case study was about the introduction of the concept of self-directed teams into a newly rehabbed plant in Corpus Christi, Texas in 2004. The analysis took place after 4 years of initial implementation of the SDT structure. Amasi expected after the implementation of SDT’s the Corpus Christi plant would achieve high productivity. Self –directed teams are small groups of employees responsible for an entire work process or segment, expected by some to be the workplace wave of the future in terms of organization and peak performance. This case study is to implement relationship between self-directed team and team effectiveness at Corpus Christi Plant.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Job analysis results were used in the job design developed to structure work and designate specific work activities of individuals or groups of individuals in an effort to achieve certain…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A self-managed team is a group of employees that take the responsibility of a supervisor. Different from the problem solving teams, in that they are the ones that come up with the ideas and are also the ones to implement them into the work place. They often chose their own members and evaluate each other with in the group. This type of group has not always shown to be positive. In one study it showed higher absenteeism and higher turnover rates. They have also shown to lack in conflict resolution with in the work place. An example of this type of group could be, student workers in an apartment complex that are hired without a “manager” in place to maintain their schedules and the way they organize their office. They are given a goal or an objective and together they decide how to reach that goal or objective.…

    • 874 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    business 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    14. What are the major benefits and limitations associated with the use of self-managed teams?…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment Week3

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B. Wellins, R. W. (1992). Self-Directed teams implementation, Building a Self-Directed Work Team, Training & Development, 46(12), 24-28.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Directed Teams

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Self-control work teams are more apt to change with the random and rapid vulnerabilities of the market trends. The market trends could be anything from changes in technology, pricing, production for competition. Self-directed work teams, also known as self-managing teams, represent a progressive approach to the way work is organized and performed.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Muthusamy, S., Wheeler, J., & Simmons, B. (2005). Self-Managing Work Teams: Enhancing Organizational Innovativeness. Organizational Develpement Journal, 23(3), 53-66.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-directing or self-designing teams: teams that also have authority to compose the team and shape their own context are termed…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Google Three Thirds HR

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oldham, Greg R., and J. Richard Hackman. "Not What It Was and Not What It Will Be: The Future of Job Design Research." Journal of Organizational Behavior 31.2-3 (2010): 463-79. Print.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Wageman, R. 1997. Critical Success Factors for Creating Superb Self-ManagingTeams. Organisational Dynamics, 26 (1): 49-62.…

    • 6668 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Study Pixar Studios

    • 2505 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). ‘The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice’ Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.…

    • 2505 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Langfred, Claus W. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal 2004, Vol. 47, No. 3 385-399…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These teams usually include from 5-15 people and are geared to produce a product or service. Members provide a range of the skills needed to produce the product. The team is granted sufficient authority and access to resources to produce their product in a timely fashion. The hallmark of a self-managed team is that members indeed manage their own group, i.e., they manage access to resources, scheduling, supervision, etc. Team members develop their own process for identifying and rotating members in managerial roles. Often, authority at any given time rests with whomever has the most expertise about the current activity or task in the overall project. Often members are trained in various problem-solving techniques and team-building techniques. These teams work best in environments where the technologies to deliver the product or service are highly complex and the marketplace and organization environments are continually changing. Self-managed teams pose a unique challenge for the traditional manager. It can be extremely difficult for him or her to support empowerment of the self-managed team, taking the risk of letting go of his or her own control.…

    • 3880 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463–479.…

    • 9163 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays