Employment at Will

Topics: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Air pollution, Business ethics Pages: 7 (2255 words) Published: March 12, 2014

PharmaCARE
We CARE about YOUR health
Yasser Benadada


Table of Contents
Stakeholders2
Analyzing the Ethics3
Who should be fired?4
Will Whistleblower Policy help PharmaCARE5
PharmaCARE’s Environmental Stewardship6
Purpose of CERCLA Act7



Stakeholders
1.The Companies: PharmaCARE was a successful and profitable pharmaceutical company. After launching the “We CARE about YOUR World®” initiative, PharmaCARE was able to defeat PAC’s lobbying efforts. Later, PharmaCARE found out their best selling diabetes drug was slowing the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Subsequently, they established the subsidiary, CompCARE to get the FDA off their backs. Later they found out that in one of their labs there was mold growing in the vents. CompCARE was later sold to WellCo right after the scandal. 2.The Governments: The FDA ensures all of the drugs that are being sold in the U.S. are safe for the patients and now that some people died from the AD23 drug, they will most likely be involved. In order to avoid the FDA restrictions, PharmaCARE opened a subsidiary and went to Colberia. They did this because they want to maximize their profits, which will be hard to achieve with FDA scrutiny. OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration) is another stakeholder. They may get involved due to the mold and sickness issues that employees have been complaining about. EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) ensures equal employment opportunity for all and advocates for folks who get discriminated because of their gender, race and religion. They may also get involved because of Ayesha’s complaint about her promotion. The Colberian Government is another one of the stakeholders because they allowed PharmaCARE to open operations in their country. 3.The Employees: The employees working for PharmaCARE and the indigenous population of Colberia who is working for CompCARE are also stakeholders in this scenario. Donna was one of the best employees; she always showed up to work and did her work. One day, Allen was told there was mold around the air vents. When the problem wasn’t taken care of Donna became really ill and began missing many days of work. Tom, one of the supervisors, warned Allen about the air quality inside the lab, after Allen made no move to fix the problem, he threatened to tell OSHA. Allen is considered one of the stakeholders because he was the one who ran the operation “Clean Room.” He had the choice of whistleblowing on the wrong doing or keeping quiet and taking the bonus. Analyzing the Ethics

PharmaCARE’s actions towards Colberia’s indigenous population and rank-and-file were very selfish and self-centered. PharmaCARE’s executives were rewarded with luxurious homes that have tennis courts, swimming pools, parks, etc. While on the other hand, the workers in Colberia that were doing the tough work were rewarded only with $1.00 a day payment for their work. There’s a big difference between the workers in Colberia and the PharmaCARE executives. The Colberia workers are being paid way below U.S. minimum wage and way below what they should be paid. According to Anderson (2004), ethics are explained as the principles and values that define acceptable conduct for business intuitions. He also explains that social responsibility is the obligations of a business organization that maximizes positive impact in its business operation and minimizes its negative impact on society. Acceptability of corporate behavior will be determine by workers, customers, competitors, government and regulatory agencies, special interest groups, and the community. The actions that PharmaCARE took towards Colberia’s indigenous population were one of many examples that reflects an unethical and irresponsible corporate culture. PharmaCARE should have paid the Colberian workers with a fair amount of money for their hard work. PharmaCARE should not have taken advantage of the Colberian environment. Instead of taking advantage of...


References: Sent ell, E., & Robbins, R. (2008). EMPLOYMENT AT-WILL. Journal Of Legal, Ethical & Regulatory Issues, 11(1), 1-15.
Pippett, C. J. (2010). Consider Whistleblower Policy Protections. Credit Union Magazine, 76(9), 56-59.
CERCLA Overview. (n.d.). EPA. Retrieved February 9, 2014, from http://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/cercla
Clarkson, K. W. (2004). West 's business law: text, cases, legal, ethical, international, and e-commerce environment (9th ed.). Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western/West.
Anderson, B. (2004). Bringing business ethics to life: Achieving corporate social responsibility. Milwaukee, Wisc: ASQ Quality Press.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Employment at Will Essay
  • Employment Law Essay
  • Employment at Will Essay
  • Employment Essay
  • Essay on Employment at Will
  • Employment- at- Will Research Paper
  • Employment AT will Essay
  • Employment at Will Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free