Managing the Changing Employment Relationship
Consider the different methods used to give effective voice to employees and critically evaluate the importance of this to the employment relationship
Due Date: 14/01/2011
Word Count: 3216
The development of the different methods used to engage ‘employee voice’ strongly coincides with the timeline that businesses have endured through in the present/ twentieth century. In the UK in particular, the methods implemented could be correlated to the economic and political climate of the country at that moment in time. This essay will look at various methods that have been used in the historical and modern context to give employees ‘voice’ which include Voluntarism, Trade Unions (TU’s) and their decline, the Psychological Contract, European Works Councils and Joint Consultation Committees (JCC’s), Informing and Consulting Directive (ICE 2004) and the High Performance Workplace.
First it is important to look at definitions of voice and why it is so important to the employment relationship. An older definition of employee voice is by Hirschman (1970), who states the idea of employee voice being a form of active dissent due to dissatisfaction. This applies rather well at the time this particular academic was writing, as the political and economic climate of the UK at the time was not the most stable. Research has expanded and built on from this, and a definition that is more applicable to modern day employee voice would be “a whole variety of processes and structures which enable, and at times empower, employees directly and indirectly, to contribute to decision-making” (Boxall and Purcell, 2003:162). This definition implies that the ‘stronger’ the voice of employees, the more efficient and productive they will be in the workplace. The employment relationship at the beginning however was not quite as communicative and well recognised.
Voluntarism was the first approach used by the Governments ‘the absence of statutory regulation’ (Hyman, 2003: 40). This was a system whereby the UK state avoided interaction in relationships between employers and employees. However the approach did not proceed fast enough leading both major political parties to introduce a comprehensive legal framework to compel reforms. During these reforms however there was no attempt to put collective bargaining on a legal footing. The social contract was also introduced around this time by the Wilson/Callaghan governments; in return the unions would control the demands of individuals for increased wages. This policy of ‘laissez-faire’ ultimately failed as unemployment levels increased by 1.3 million people between1974-1979. Although this is not directly concerned with employee’ voice’, it is beginning to show that the employment relationship is starting to be taken seriously by organisations and the government.
The Donovan Report (1968) identified Britain has two systems of industrial relations. The first is the formal system embodied in the official institutions for example, Trade Unions. The other is the informal system created by the actual behaviour of unionist workers, employers associations, of managers, shop stewards and workers.
In the United Kingdom worker representation has traditionally been channelled through recognised Trade Unions. This is a single-channel approach where a recognised union may have a monopoly on worker representation. With the creation of Trade Unions, the notion of employee voice has come to the forefront of academic study. At the beginning, employee voice and its industrials actions were extremely damaging to the UK’s economy, the Winter of Discontent in 1978-1979 is an extreme example, where multiple unions were on strike at the same time.
The Conservative Government Legislation introduced mainly over the 1980’s and early 1990’s was to ‘reduce’ the unions’ voice and power and try to put a restriction on its actions, trying to effectively sever...
References: Benson, J. and Brown, M. (2010) Employee voice: Does Union membership really matter? Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p80-99.
Black, S. and Lynch, L. (2004), “What’s driving the new economy? The benefits of workplace innovation”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 114 No. 493, pp. 97-116.
Boxall, P. and Purcell J., (2003), ‘Strategy and Human Resource Management’, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.
Brotherton, C. (2003) ‘Industrial relations and psychology’, in P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds) Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, P. (2005) "Non-union employee representation: exploring the efficacy of the voice process", Employee Relations, Vol. 27 Iss: 3, pp.272 – 288.
Cully, M., Woodland, S., O’Reilly, A., Dix, G., Millward, N., Bryson, A. and Forth, J. (1999), Britain at Work, Routledge, London.
Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M. and Ackers, A., (2004), “The meanings and purpose of employee voice”, The International Journal of Human Resources Management, Vol.15, No.6, pp.1149-1170 .
Guest, D. (2007) ‘Human resource management and the worker: towards a new psychological contract?’, in P. Boxall, J. Purcell and P. Wright (eds) Oxford Handbook of Human Resources Management , Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farnham, D., Pimlott, J. (1995), Understanding Industrial Relations, 5th ed., Cassell, London.
Freeman, R. and Lazear, E. (1995). ‘An economic analysis of works councils’, in (J. Rogers, and W. Streeck, eds.), Works Councils, pp. 27–52, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gilman, M. and Marginson, P. (2002) ‘Negotiating European Works Councils: contours of constrained choice’, Industrial Relations Journal, 37 (5): 473-91
Herriot, P. and Pemberton, C. (1995) New Deals: The Revolution in Management Careers, London: Wiley.
Hyman, R. (1996) ‘Is there a case for statutory works councils in Britain’, in McColgan, A. (ed.) The Future of Labour Law, London: Cassell, pp. 64-84.
Jenkins, Jen; Blyton, Paul, (2008) “Works Councils” from Blyton, Paul; Bacon, N; Fiorito, J; Heery, E, The SAGE handbook of industrial relations pp.346-357, Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage
Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G. and Oxenbridge, S. (2005) Inside the Workplace: First findings from the 2004 Employment relations Survey, London: DTI.
Laulom, S. (2010) The Flawed Revision of the European Works Council Directive, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 39, No.2
Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A
McCabe, D. and Lewin, D. (1992), “Employee voice, a human resource management perpective”, California Management Review, Spring, pp. 112-23.
Sisson, K. (2002), “The information and consultation directive: unnecessary ‘regulation’ or an opportunity to promote ‘partnership’”, Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, No. 67, Warwick University, Coventry.
Towers, B. (1997), The Representation Gap: Change and Reform in the British and American Workplace, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document