Preview

Emperor Shihuangdi vs Emperor Hadrian

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emperor Shihuangdi vs Emperor Hadrian
ngdHuangdi versus Hadrian
Who ruled their empire more effectively?

Shi Huangdi was China’s first Emperor, and Emperor Hadrian was perhaps the Roman’s greatest Emperor. They both tried to control their empires using similar methods, such as building roads, training a strong army with military tactics, erecting frontiers to keep out the invaders. By looking at their personalities, armies, transport systems, and how they controlled the frontiers, I think Hadrian is more effective in ruling his empire.

Both Roman and Chinese people obeyed their emperors but for different reasons. This helped the emperors to keep control because people would listen to their commands and would not turn against them. Hadrian was a respected Emperor who loved his subjects. He ended unpopular wars; introduced humane laws and protected slaves from their masters. He travelled around his empire to be with his people, to witness problems faced by them. On the contrary, Shi Huangdi was an extremely ruthless person, and was feared by the people. He believed in Legalism, the belief in strict laws and punishments. In order to create the Great Wall of China, he sent thousands of people to work on it and many of them perished in the harsh conditions and treatment while building the wall.

An efficient army was important in helping the Emperors to control their empires. During Hadrian’s reign, the Roman army was the most powerful force in the ancient world. He inherited the army from Trajan, the great conqueror. There were 30 legions with 6,000 men each. Apart from the great numbers, the Roman legionaries and auxiliaries were well equipped and trained. The Roman army had experienced wars with rival kings such as Hannibal and Mithradates. The Romans also had the Germans and Celts to the north of their borders in Germany, Scotland and the Middle East. The Qin also had a large, efficient army and capable generals. The army used the most advanced weaponry of his time. Their weapons were made of



Bibliography: http://www.china-history.net/qin.htm http://www.hyperhistory.net/apwh/bios/b3huangdi-firstemperor.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_Shi_Huang http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/hadrian/p/Hadrian.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    e west and the east, empires dominated the world from the 2nd century BC to the 2nd century AD. The main one in each area being the Roman Empire in the west, and the Chinese empire, or specifically the Han dynasty, in the east. While these two empires are thousands of miles apart and nearly one hundred years, there are many similarities between the two. The most significant difference between the two empires is the basis of government ideals.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and The Roman Empire both were able to expand and develop their empires with their distinctive governing methods and control. To China, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who greatly observed the Mandate of Heaven. The Han developed a supply of soldiers, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, blended structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Republic, which was more like a monarchy, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The governors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could have leaded to outbreaks in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was entirely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social interaction.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China Ccot Before 600 Ce

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Primarily, the Chinese states emerge 2200 BCE, under the Xia, Shang, and Zhou Dynasties, but fell into the age of warring states. Its unification had vanished and there were endless rivalries among seven competing kingdoms. Qin Shihuangdi(ruled 221-210 BCE) was one of the rulers from the various states that had successfully reunified China. He used his already developed effective bureaucracy and launched military campaigns to defeat the other warring states. He adopted a political philosophy called Legalism that had pessimistic views on human nature and subordinated the aristocrats who disliked his centralized policies, whereas the Han dynasty later had more of a Confucian Theme in their governing philosophy. He was strict and once put 460 scholars to death as a warning for those who oppose him. He led some contributions to innovation by standardizing weights, measurement and currency, equipping his armies with iron weapons and had agricultural systems that enforce growth in populations. He also recruited laborers to construct the Great Wall of China, which was designed to keep the barbarians astray. The Qin dynasty collapse by peasants uprisings who suffered under Qin harsh policies and led to the founding of the Han Dynasty.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences of the control and management of both regions may be attributed to the philosophical ideas and belief systems that existed at the time, influencing political structure in similar ways with only a few minor differences that set the two cultures apart.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The similarities in the political figures between the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were clear. The Martial Emperor Wudi of the Han Dynasty and Octavian, later known as Augustus Caesar, both have corresponding achievements that were both good for their respective empires. Both rulers reorganized the army and gained much land. Augustus Caesar gained more land for Rome than any other Roman ruler. Han Wudi achieved the most land for China than any other previous ruler as well. Augustus Caesar gave more self-government to their provinces and districts to maintain order. This was also so that they could focus on their empires as a whole rather than worry about local affairs. Han Wudi did something similar when he sent imperial officers to implement his policies and maintain order in administrative provinces and districts. Both rulers created large bureaucracies to administer their empires and they both worked strenuously to increase the authority and prestige of the central government. These similarities between the two political figures displayed both empires’ wealth and stability. They both encouraged the construction of institutional frameworks that promoted the long-term survival of their own respective cultures.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman army was the most successful and powerful army in history, they built the Roman Empire, which spread over continents and lasted for a very long time. The Romans achieved fame for its amazing army. There are many reasons why the Roman army was so successful. The army offered Roman citizens to return with glory and money after serving Rome in battles. Their weapons and equipment was a lot more advanced than their enemies, which requires a lot more practice, so the army insisted much on training its soldiers. The army’s organization is designed very well, with the intelligent tactics, they are often undefeatable.…

    • 861 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weapons In Ancient China

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman soldiers were trained to become strong heroes for Rome. The soldiers were strong fighting men that were trying to protect their country. The Roman army had a useful type of weapon, the spear. They also had a spear shooter that was like a crossbow but bigger and heavier. It was called a Ballista. Roman soldiers did not have much armor for the whole body, they had more on their chest. Roman soldiers would take cover when shots were fired. Once the initial arrows flew they were free to go in for the kill. Daggers and any type of strong cutting blades helped back them.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the reasons why the Roman army was so successful are to so with their superior weapons and equipment. The weapons include a small dagger called a pugio which was mainly used for use around the camp. Another is the sword also known as a gladius. It was light and short, no more than 15 cm long so soldiers could use it for close hand to hand fighting and stabbing. There was also a spear which was also called a pilum. A Soldier would carry two of them which are just over 2m long. After they were thrown to the enemies they would bend and stick into the opponents shield so they could not use it for protection and it would snap so it could not be thrown back. Also there was the shield (scrotum) which was used to protect most of the body. And finally there is the helmet, also known as the cassis, it is worn on the head. It has cheek plates at the sides to protect them from sword blows and a peak at the back to protect from the enimies coming from behind and also to protect the neck from sunburn because sometimes they are marching all day in hot countries. This helps the roman army to be successful because if they were fighting and they were running around without anything to protect them then they would be easily killed.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confucius believed that a well-ordered society tied to ancient tradition and education. An ideal ruler must be compassionate, not forceful, care for the burden of their people. Failure to do so the ruler will lose the “Mandate of Heaven” and have a disasters reign. Qin Shi Huang follows Legalists the belief that people were basically motivated by self-interest and therefore had to be controlled by a strong ruler and stern punishments. Under Qin Shi Huang rule, he appointed district officials to investigate crimes, arrested suspects, and acted as judges.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianization In Rome

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When the Roman Empire’s military first came about, it was large and didn’t have as good of organization as it did at the end of the empire. Rome’s military was extremely well organized and were prearranged around smaller, more maneuverable units. The Roman Empire had some units of cavalry and the greatest navy power during that period. This was due to the new developed large, steel armor, rather than the previous small armor. The military had also changed because of the weapons to destroy and conquer other peoples. The invention of catapults was exclusive to the navy. The generals began gaining responsibility for justice in the Empire. This was something new for the Empire. Near the end of the Roman Empire, generals were used for more than leading the successful Roman military. Another change of the Roman military was the soldiers. During the first creation of the military, soldiers were not paid and the weak were put in front. The weak soldiers were still put in front but they were trained more so they were more successful. Also the soldiers were paid wages and with the new slaves being introduced, slaves were also used as a major part of the military. The Roman military set up camps and built roads to aid their military. This made it easier for the military to accommodate to where they were fighting at. Watch towers were put on these camps to look out for the city. These camps became prospering cities for the Roman Empire during the period. The Roman military had changed a lot during the 100-600 C.E.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also redistributed land to the peasants in an attempt to break up the nobles' power. Also, he broke up China's old provinces and loyalties and created new ones ruled by non-hereditary governors who could not build their power up in one place over several generations. Shih Huang Ti also created a unified law code, tax system, coinage, and system of weights and measures so that government and commerce could proceed smoothly. The Qin emperor had numerous building programs, among which were roads and canals to promote trade as well as the swift movement of armies, a huge capital at Hsien Yang where all the most powerful families of the realm were required to move, and a fabulous tomb guarded by 6000 larger than life terra-cotta soldiers in full battle order armed with bronze weapons, chariots, and terra-cotta horses. His death in 210 B.C.E. triggered a number of revolts and civil wars that led to the rapid fall of the Qin Dynasty and the rise of the Han Dynasty.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 221 BC all the states were unified, and Shi Huangdi became the first Emperor of China. The Great Wall of China was one of Shi Huangdi’s most noted accomplishments, but how did it come of any good to China? During the time period of the Warring States; this is when the states of Chu, Qi, Yan , Wei, Zhao and Qin were in conflict.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Shi Huangdi A Menace

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One reason Shi Huangdi was a menace because he had horrible policies. In the video it states that he “subjected his people to high taxation.” Because of this high taxation, the people got very mad at Shi Huangdi and some people even tried to kill him. According to the video, Shi Huangdi “ had hundreds of thousands of people punished through forced labor. He made these people build the great wall or, making Terracotta soldiers.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays