Eli Lilly

Satisfactory Essays
Case Context
Set in 1993, the case focuses on a difficult decision faced by Steve Mueller, manager of strategic facilities and planning at Eli Lilly, about the type of manufacturing facility to construct for the three new pharmaceutical products that the company plans to launch in 1996. A number of growing industry and company specific conditions have made this decision particularly relevant and have sparked debate with management and throughout the company. In response to these conditions, Lilly management decided to establish a set of company-wide goals that focused on improving time to market for its products in development and a reduction of manufacturing costs. Specifically, these goals were:
1. Reduced new product time to market by 50% from the current 8 -12 year process
2. Reduce the cost of manufacturing by (25%)
The key to achieving these goals was Mueller’s decision of what kind of manufacturing facilities should be used to produce the new products. This equated to a debate between a strategy of “specialized” manufacturing plant which had worked well for Lilly in the past, and a proposed strategy of building “flexible” manufacturing facilities that could accommodate almost any of the company’s new products. It was required that whichever facilities strategy chosen must align with the two company goals listed above.
Our Recommendation
Based on our analysis of the situation and the assumptions outlined in this report, we recommend that Steve Mueller decide to implement a version of the Flexible & Specialized hybrid system that was proposed under Option 2 in the case. This would entail building multiple Flexible facilities that would serve as “launch plants” to produce the new drugs in the company’s pipeline, as well as complementary specialized facilities to handle high growth drugs that exceeded flexible plant capacity. Our analysis showed that the Flexible hybrid option has the following advantages:
 Higher NPV
 Improved Speed to Market =

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eli and Lilly

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    but the population of India cannot be ignored. And 200 million and 300 million of 800 million people in India were middle class. That was a huge potential market for Eli Lilly and Company. As the cost of health-care increased in developed countries in the 1990s, chose India was a good choice for a international company like Eli and Lilly. Especially could uses India as trade route to export products to Russia, so choose India had a lot of advantages. 2. Was deciding to partner wrong? Is partnership…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eli Lilly

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Eli Lilly: Developing Cymbalta Case Study 1: Analysis The given discussion is based on Eli Lilly, a research-based pharmaceutical company. The first core strategy of Eli Lilly and company was to replace its premier drug “Prozac” before losing its patent. The second is differentiating the company and its brand. Lilly began concentrating and devoting its resources to other possible assets: R-fluoxetine, OFC (olanzapine-fluoxetine combination), 5HT2 Antagonist, SSRI, Business Development Opportunities…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    eli lilly

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    traditional approach used for organizing development projects at Eli Lilly? This consists of two issues. First, is an evaluation of the changes taking place in the pharmaceutical industry and what it is that caused Lilly to feel compelled to try the heavyweight development approach on two of its drug development projects? Second, is understanding the essence of the heavyweight team approach, particularly as it has been used by Lilly? A Heavyweight team structure is a project management organizational…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eli Lilly

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    heavyweight team at Lilly. • First, the teams were each given a very clear business charter “to focus exclusively on the development of a single compound.” • Second, each team was collocated and cross functional. • Third, the teams were each led by a “heavyweight” project manager. • Fourth, each team took responsibility for the sub-stance of the work, how the work was accomplished, and the ensuing results. • Fifth, each team had two executive sponsors, one from LRL (Lilly Research Laboratories)…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eli Lilly

    • 2933 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Eli Lilly and Company:Drug Development Strategy Assignment One RSM494: Technological Strategy 2/16/2012 Antora Sanchari Ahmed 997292139 Professor Terry Amburgey TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………..3 Market Analysis……………………………………………………………………………4 Industry Analysis………………………………………………………………………….5…

    • 2933 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eli Lilly

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Eli Lilly Eli Lilly’s approach to supply chain management is somewhat unique due in large part to their type of industry, pharmaceuticals. While many firms would traditionally focus on things such as just in time inventory or inventory reductions, Eli Lilly does not because an inventory shortage in their industry is unacceptable as often times, people health or even their lives are at stake. Eli Lilly has adapted their supply chain management to meet the needs of their industry by ensuring the…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eli Lilly

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case# 6 - Eli Lilly: The Elvista Project 1. What is a "heavyweight project team" and how does it differ from the traditional approach used for organizing projects at Eli Lilly? Their traditional approach was much less organized and personal. Heavy weight teams at Eli Lilly were setup so that specialized individuals would work on one project (as opposed to several) led by a project manager. The project manager would then designate individual jobs and make sure that they were completed. Five key…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eli Lilly Case

    • 3871 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Competing through Strategy Case: Eli Lilly in India: Rethinking the Joint Ventures Strategy I. Brief Summary Global pharmaceuticals had presence in India since early 80’s and it was not until 1993 that Eli Lilly International decided to establish a Joint Venture with India’s second largest laboratory and exporter, Ranbaxy. This move happened in a very challenging context as both companies have very different profiles and backgrounds. The main differential characteristic was the nature…

    • 3871 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eli Lilly &Company

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Case 3 :Eli Lilly &company Question: To continue generating the returns enjoyed by the industry over the past decade, pharmaceutical companies would be forced to rethink how they identify and exploit opportunities to gain a competitive edge in an increasingly complex market ? In my opinion if a Pharmaceutical company aims to continue generating the returns and gain competitive edge , should conduct Pharmaceutical Industry Analysis which will help to find out opportunities and then should try…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eli Lilly & Company

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eli Lilly and Company is one of the world’s top pharmaceutical companies, and is located in the United States. Their main competitors in the United States are Johnson and Johnson Corporation and Pfizer Incorporated. All three companies specialize in the manufacturing of pharmaceutical and medical products. Using the financial ratios to analyze Eli Lilly’s competitive position, it is apparent that in most cases the company comes in second place with regards to its top 2 competitors. The short term…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays