Preview

Electoral College Should Be Abolished

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Electoral College Should Be Abolished
As one of the most controversial elections in history, the 2016 presidential elections between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump marked another year where the popular vote did not coincide with the electoral vote. The fact that Trump won the election even after losing the popular vote by over one million votes, brought an already ongoing debate to the forefront: To keep the electoral college or not? Some critics believe that it creates an emphasis on largely populated states and others argue that low-populated states are given greater, unfair representation. Regardless, both arguments share a common thread: an inequitable representation. The electoral college should be abolished due to being undemocratic, over representing small states, and depriving third parties of a fair chance. …show more content…
Part of a democratic nation involves the equality of rights. However, in utilizing the electoral college, it is possible for the candidate to win presidency with a minimum of eleven states (Doc A). Yes, it is highly improbable for a candidate to garner all the support from the states with the highest electoral vote but the fact that the possibility exists is highly undemocratic since it would ignore more than half of the states. In continuance in its unfair representation, the electoral college does not equivalate the votes of every person. For example, twelve states has approximately three hundred thousand less people in population than Illinois, yet those states receive a total of forty-four electoral votes in comparison to Illinois’ twenty votes (Doc D). It gives the people from the twelve states a higher representation than those in Illinois which is the opposite of the United States democratic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, the Electoral College should go. I have three reasons why the Electoral College should be either get rid of. My reasons are that it focuses more on smaller states than big states, Hamilton had other intentions for the Electoral College, and the Electoral College was meant to be for small states so it would be more equal.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. And Congress has on several occasions held highly publicized hearings on Electoral College reform but overall has remained fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and therefore a major aspect of American democracy and government, its very nature is quite unfair and undemocratic. Many of its aspects portray biases and favor certain groups of people and certain states. It is deemed archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many scholars and is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone’s instrumental voting model for the Electoral College at first makes one believe as if one’s vote counts but eventually one figures out that it is in fact quite unimportant (Stone, p. 51). For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is – the Electoral College presidential election system that is.…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The upcoming presidential election is just around the corner, and with that comes the never ending debate over the Electoral College. Should it be abolished? Why is it beneficial? Why was it even created? These are just some questions usually associated with the Electoral College. On the contrary to what some might think the Electoral College should be in place and not abolished. Why? To understand this one must first know why the the founding fathers created it, what the Electoral College is, and understand the views of the naysayers.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Electoral College violates political equality and document D is proof. You will agree without a doubt that the Electoral College weighs some of the citizens votes more heavily than others. In document , Illinois has a larger population than Washington D.C and 12 other states combined. Those 12 states have more of a say in the Electoral College. A chart in document A has various sources to support its evidence. Not to mention the citizens of Illinois and larger states have proportionately less power in the presidential election than other citizens in smaller states. As a result we should most definitely eliminate the Electoral College. The Electoral College is an unfair system. California is the third largest state but it has the most electoral votes than any other states. The smallest number of electoral votes, the lowest a states can have is 3 because each state has at least one representative. A candidate could win the electoral votes with only 11 states with a total of 256 votes. Connecticut only has seven votes it's not the biggest but it's still an important state in the United States of America. The Electoral College should be abolished because it's unfair and complicated system.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One very crucial reason there should be no Electoral College is that it violates political equality. “At base, it violates political equality, it’s not a neutral counting device; instead, it favors some citizens over others (George Edwards).” Not all…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest advantages of the Electoral College is the firm political stability it provides the nation by encouraging the two-party system. (Kimberling, n.d.) Without the two-party system, votes would be splintered among many candidates and would result in constant recounts and mass confusion. In this way, the system is very transparent and greatly aids in reaching a majority. The College also contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. Therefore, it is impossible for one region to hold the absolute majority of required electoral votes. Without this mechanism in place, it is possible that the president would be selected either through the denomination of one populous region over the others, or through the denomination of large metropolitan areas over the rural ones. (Kimberling, n.d.) Another great advantage offered by the College is the enhancement of the status of minority groups. This makes it possible for voters of small minorities, be they ethnic minorities or labor unions, in any given state to make the difference between winning all or none of a state’s electoral votes. (Kimberling, n.d.) Finally, it encourages candidates to view the country as a whole and can offer the framework for establishing and organizing campaigns. (apecsec.org,…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There have been many talks about the Electoral College and how it should or should not be abolished when election time comes around. Many people feel that the electoral college is unfair because it seems that even if we vote it only comes down to the electoral college to see if they won presidency or re-election. Personally, I feel that the Electoral College should be abolished nationwide, so that way our voice can be “heard” or used more within the government. It should also be abolished because of the fact how in most of the elections, the Presidents are most and only elected because of the electoral college and our own vote, the vote that we had taken our own time to choose our future leader that will guide the country in the right path. Instead, the states choose who to vote just because the majority of the Electoral College is just one of the parties that dominate that state and not the other. For example, since the state of Texas is Republican dominated, what if the people had voted for the democratic side and the democratic won by the popular votes in the state of Texas, then it wouldn’t matter just because of how the state chooses who to vote because of the majority of the party in Texas. This to me is very outrageous because of how our forefathers from the past had fought for our right to vote, it is being put to waste since it only goes by the Electoral College and not our votes. For example, when Al Gore ran for his presidency the first time, we had the people, even though I wasn’t the age to vote at the moment, had chosen Al Gore to run this fine country of ours, even though the popular vote came close. He was the clear winner that the people had chosen to lead this country, but instead was cheated out of being President because of how George W. Bush had won the Electoral College by a small margin; he was instead elected to be the President to lead our nation. Because of this also, if feel that it is actually time for the…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created an uneducated and ill-informed populace that the Founding Fathers did not trust to elect the president. Instead, they chose a solution that solved the problems of their time period and combined the will of the people with the more educated congressmen: the electoral college. In the electoral college, each state, and the District of Columbia, are given a certain amount of electors, or votes, based on their number of seats in Congress. Each state receives an automatic two votes for their senators, plus however many seats they hold in the House of Representatives. The number of electors a state receives is in direct correlation with its size since the number of seats in the House of Representatives is determined by population. There are a total of 538 electoral votes spread out among the states. The presidential election is basically fifty-one separate elections where each state decides what candidate receives…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Such a form of government (republican democracy), the Founders believed, would allow them to achieve two potentially conflicting objectives: avoiding the "tyranny of the majority" inherent in pure democratic systems, while allowing the "sense of the people" to be reflected in the new American government”(Ross). The sense of the people was important to the founding fathers. They wanted the small potato farmer from Idaho, the corn farmer in Iowa, and the cattle rancher in Texas to be involved in the nation’s politics due to their hard work and dedication. Without the Electoral College their crucial voices would be drowned out by the millions of voices in large cities who may not understand their way of life. “The Electoral College protects and empowers minorities... by forcing candidates to compete for states rather than for individual votes, the Electoral College system gives minorities a stronger voice” (Science Buzz). It is important for everyone to have a voice and contribute to their nation. The Electoral College provides a way for minorities to have a voice and be part of their state and…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of electing our president has been fairly consistent throughout the past 50 years and one thing that has not changed since our constitution was written is the use of an electoral college to elect the president. By using an Electoral College voters do not directly vote for their next president, instead they submit a vote that is then tallied by the electors and whichever party has the most votes at the end gets all of the Electoral College votes from that state. The use of an Electoral College has been the topic of a lot of debate in recent years, especially after the election in the year 2000 in which Al Gore won the popular vote, but failed to become president because George W. Bush won the electoral votes. There are people whom favor the use of an electoral college and there are people who think that it should be abolished and that voters should be able to directly vote for their president. For my paper I want to present both arguments, each side’s pros and cons, and ultimately whether or not I think we should or should not change the use of an electoral college.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Electoral College Benefits

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Those in favor of the college, lean on the certainty of the outcome, as its vote protects the interest of small states. In the election of 2004, for example, President Obama received a majority of the electoral vote, but only half of the popular vote. While all of the United States reward the winning candidate with all of the electoral votes, a mere plurality would create a landslide victory of the electoral vote. Author, Tara Ross writes, “…appears to retain the small advantage, while giving greater weight to the popular vote. In reality, it would devolve into constant disputes about who gets the last electoral vote in each state. The Electoral College, by contrast, tends to magnify margins of victory and give certain election outcomes,” (Ross pg. 159). Lastly, just as those that favor the Electoral College believe that the President should have the support of the people, those that oppose it feel like the people should then be able to pick the President. The idea is that the personal vote does not mean anything because citizens may vote one way while the Electoral College votes another, thereby making the popular vote obsolete. In the Academic Journal “Who Should Elect the President? The Case Against the Electoral College,” the author writes, “In the minds of some, there is a question of whether our form of government as a federal republic is safeguarded by having the Electoral College. According to this view, the fact that this country is a federation of states, and that the Constitution assigns certain powers to the federal government while others remain with the states, is of more importance than direct election of the President based on the principle of one person, one vote,” (Jenkins pg.176). Nevertheless, the rules are fair and the objective is…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander Hamilton once said of the Electoral College, that, “The mode of appointment of the Chief Magistrate of the United States is almost the only part of the system, of any consequence, which has escaped without severe censure. . . . I venture somewhat further, and hesitate not to affirm that if the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent” (Schumaker 13). These words that were spoken more than 200 years ago still ring true today; the system we use to decide our chief of state may at times seem to have its apparent faults, but overall it is an excellent and fair way to see that the most popular candidate be elected. Although in recent years a debate has arisen over whether or not the Electoral College accurately portrays the views of the American people, or if the so-called “convoluted” system is even necessary. Critics of the Electoral College believe we should simply abolish it and move on to a direct popular vote system, but what many of these critics do not realize is that the Electoral College is a facet to the framework of the American government. It was written into the U.S. Constitution due to concerns about a nationwide election becoming a maelstrom of confusion, and fears about the politically unstable environment of the time; furthermore, it was established to balance the state 's and people 's interests. America’s electoral process should not be abolished, because it maintains the federal system of government and representation and contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, this notion distorts the one-man one vote principle, which characterizes many democracies across the world. A direct popular vote is a manifestation of true democracy and a fair electoral process but the Electoral College, which characterizes America’s presidential election process, takes this away. In Western counties such as France, when there is no clear winner of a presidential race, a runoff occurs to determine the person who the president becomes. The concepts of fairness, justice and democracy are important in the modern world are should neb manifested in terms of representation, choice, and political systems. The right to vote should upheld in a manner that gives every American citizen the responsibility and chance to vote knowing that his or her vote…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays