Electoral College Case Study

The way our country has elected the president is very unique compared to other countries so in order to understand it, Tanay and I broke down in pieces. In order, for a person to win the presidency they must, campaign in as many states as possible to the backing of their political party. This means that they have to win primary’s to even have a shot at winning the presidency. Once a person has the political backing, they continue to campaign and begin speaking at debates. In regards to the presidential, people vote in their state for president they would like to win. Since most voters were farmers, a two day voting window was needed. weekends were a problem because the majority of people attended church on Sunday. In addition to weekends, Wednesdays were bad because that was market day
Additionally, they did not want to give the power to one of the branches. If they gave it to one of the the branches, that branch would have more power than the others. Eventually, the Committee on Postponed matters came up with a solution that the people vote would affect who wins but would not directly elect the president. Nowadays, this solution is called the electoral college. In the case of the electoral college, the electors vote for the president based on the popular vote in the state. Each political party picks a specific number of electors who have helped with the campaign and then wait for the presidential results from one's state to come in. The specific number is the total number of the two senators plus the number of Representatives they have in the house, which changes from state to state. Once the results have come in, depending on which party wins, those representatives from that party go to their state capital and put in the official vote. In conclusion, the electoral college works to an extent, but some changes are