Preview

El Cid Leader

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1099 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
El Cid Leader
Throughout the semester the topic of what it means to be a leader is brought up in every book. Not only has this topic been brought up, the meaning of a good leader has evolved. In the beginning a good leader only had to have great strength and show he was fearless in the face of death. As the books changed, so did the meaning of a good leader. In El Cid, being a true leader meant so much more than just having an excellent sword arm in battle. A good leader must show selflessness and generosity toward his supporters, he must be able to show a vulnerability, and he must show that he has an objective that they are working toward.
A poor leader is a person that has strong qualities, but doesn’t have an objective. Whether that objective is to
…show more content…
The Cid shows throughout the poem that he has all the qualities that the heroes in the other books have, like strength, intelligence, and fearlessness. The Cid also demonstrates that he is a good leader by working his way through the muslim kingdom’s conquering land and taking as much loot as he can. This may sound like a poor objective, and he may be viewed as a poor leader because he raided a bunch of muslim lands. However, he did these things while he was in exile in order to regain favor with his king. El Cid was a good leader in this was because he wasn’t aimlessly raiding innocent lands for the wealth. After many of the Cid’s raids he had some of his men deliver some of the loot and horses to king Alfonso even though King Alfonso was the one who exiled him from Castille at the beginning of the poem. After one of the Cid’s many raids, he had Minaya bring thirty horses with their saddles, and fully equipped to King Alfonso. This is the first mention of his true objective during his campaigns. At first the raids seem like his mission is to regain a name for himself after he was banished, however sat this point he shows that he isn’t necessarily trying to regain status, he is trying to regain a …show more content…
He also shows that he is human by having a vulnerability. Many great leaders in any time period show a vulnerability that makes them stronger. This allows them to stay focused because if they aren’t doing a good job as a leader people may exploit their vulnerability to destroy them. An example where vulnerability wasn’t a trait in a good leader was in Beowulf. In Beowulf, Beowulf didn’t express any vulnerabilities until the very end when he is up against the dragon, old age was the only thing that prevented him from easily defeating the dragon. This is different from El Cid because the Cid shows he has a vulnerability at the beginning of the poem, when he is saying goodbye to his wife and daughters. Before the Cid left on his campaign the poem states that “they parted with such pain as when the fingernail is torn from the flesh.” During this scene the Cid shows that he cares deeply for his family and having to leave behind while he is in exile hurts him. This shows that his vulnerability is his family. Later in the poem, the infantes of Carrion try to exploit this vulnerability, but like the strong leader the Cid is he is able to find justice for the infantes beating his daughters in the forest of corpses and abandoning them because he had his loyal vassals to support

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A leader is not a title earned for the sole purpose of bettering one’s position in society. After all, one cannot ordain themselves a leader, they must demonstrate themselves to be one to their peers and to themselves. Being a leader involves…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He has become able to reveal remorse and acts of sincere compassion. He has accepted his flaws and certain death because of them. Nobles would have no reason to changes his ways considering there is no changing his fate, he did what he had to do in order to make things right for himself. There is no way of knowing the mind of Jonathon Nobles, considering his actions he was able to overcome his mistakes and become a man of a saved soul. Earle saw the changes of this imprisoned man just through his writings. Earle could look through the tough prisoner and begin to see the long and successful recover. Nobles became everything that society thrives on but never can achieve. I am not saying that the murders of those young people helped Nobles become the man he was supposed to be, yet in some cases it takes pain and regret to realize the changes you need to make within oneself. Earle was familiar with Nobles situation, his past was filled with drugs and alcohol and Earle himself was a rehabilitated man. When you have been down that road you can spot others who are struggling just as bad as you have and I truly agree with the thoughts of Earle and his faith in this man. Without accepting people like Earle and Nobles this world would forever be filled with hate and remorseless people. It takes real men and women to accept their wrongs and learn from them. Nobles did the crime, the time, and eventually met his maker son before his natural time. Who knows the life Nobles would have lived without prison, but because of his time he was able to become a changed…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cincinnatus: A Roman Hero

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cincinnatus won the war in 13 days. Many people were happy and they asked Cincinnatus to be a dictator for life. Cincinnatus turned down the offer because he knew that having a republic was better that having a dictator. He knew that a dictator could abused their power. Cincinnatus left Rome and continued his life on his farm. One reason Cincinnatus should be recognized as a hero was that he won a war in 13 days. If Cincinnatus did not step in, Rome would be destroyed and many people would have died. Most heroes are pictured as people who win battles and save lives. The second reason that Cincinnatus should be a hero was that he was selfless. Cincinnatus turned down the offer to be a dictator for life because he wanted to help his city instead of himself. He knew that having a republic was better than having a dictator. If Cincinnatus became a dictator, he would have been greedy enough for power. Instead, he turned down the offer and continued his life on his farm. This shows that Cincinnatus was not greedy for power. He puts people in front of himself. He gave up the offer for his city. This shows that Cincinnatus is selfless. Of all the things he did, he should be recognized as a…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While he never actually became a dictator, he showed many of the qualities that describe a powerful dictator. The main aspect of leadership he shows is the opportunity for corruption in people. In Brutus’s words: “He would be crowned. How that might change his nature, there's the question.”(Shakespeare) There is no way to tell what Caesar will become if he does take the Roman crown. Caesar also uses manipulation. During the scene where Caesar refuses the crown, he is manipulating the audience into thinking he doesn’t want the crown and surveying the audience as to whether or not they want him to be emperor. Lastly, he holds himself in high esteem. Quotes like, “I am as constant as the northern star,” (Shakespeare) and “Danger knows full well that Caesar is more dangerous than he.” (Shakespeare) really explore the mentality of Caesar. This narcissistic mentality is something that would show even brighter in a single dictator…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, a good leader must posses the ability to effectively communicate. A good leader must know what they want to accomplish. The main…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Nussbaum’s interview she talks about the political leader and how their role is important in society, she says, “And so they have the image often of the person as like a plant, something that is fairly sturdy, that has a definite structure, but that is always in need of support from the surrounding society. And the political leader in that image is like the gardener, who has to tend to the plant” (4). Creon has to make sure the society is just and anybody who is a traitor to the city must be executed. Creon is in a rough position because in The Republic there is a question of how can you determine who is just or unjust? Because the unjust who seem just are the ones that get rewarded and the ones that are truly just get neglected. This relates to Creon because he has to make these kinds of decisions and he could be executing people that are actually just. That is why at the end of the play he is left alone, drowning in his own…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar was very ambitious. He would do what ever it would take to get where he wanted to be. Julius did not accept defeat. On one occasion, Julius was sent on an embassy mission to Nicomedes, to obtain a fleet of ships. Julius succeeded, but rumor has it that his speaking abilities alone were not enough to persuade the king.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone by David Greene

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    declares that he will improve the city (she) by his rulings. Creon describes how his…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar’s leadership skill were shown in many ways but perhaps the most important way would be that he lead many troops into war and was successful. When the Cobbler tells Marullus “But indeed, sir, we make holiday to see Caesar and to rejoice in his triumph” (I. i. 30). This shows how Caesar lead his troops and won a major war. Due to him winning the people even recognized his great leadership skills. Something else to ponder about Caesars murder is the fact that Brutus said they murdered Caesar because he was to ambitious. Yet Caesar was anything but ambitious, in many ways we can see this, but the most obvious thing Caesar did that proved he was definitely not ambitious was when Brutus asks Casca about the shouting at the festival “Why, there was a crown offered to him; and being offered to him, he put it by with the back of his hand, thus; and then the people fell a-shouting. What was the second noise for? Why, for that too. They shouted thrice; what was the last cry for? Why, for that too. Was the crown offered him thrice? Ay, marry, wasn’t, and he put it by thrice, every time gentler that other; and at every putting-by mine honest neighbors shouted” (II. ii. 220). This evidence shows that Caesar at any point could have become king but instead, because he was not ambitious, he denied. Caesar was a great leader and certainly was not…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The writing of The Gallic Wars by himself in third person was a propaganda to portray himself as a successful military commander. I think Julius Caesar was a man with ambition to become greater and to gain popular support of the people for more power in controlling the government of Rome. In the book, these are many of the fine qualities like: talent for commander, persuasive speaker both military and politically, and ambition for glory that Caesar had or he portrayed himself to enabled to triumph against odds that were almost always against him. He did whatever it takes in order to achieve his goal, in this respect, he follows his famous phrase, "I came, I saw, I conquered," exactly.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Good Or Bad

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Cesar was a noble man in many different ways. He is tough but at the same time he also cares for everybody including his friends, country, and the people who disliked him. He showed his toughness…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Identity Essay

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During a conflict in the fifth century, he was appointed dictator by the senate. A messenger from the city reached him at his small farm, while he was tending to his small plot of land. “This naturally surprised him, and, asking if all were well, he told his wife Racilia to run to their cottage and fetch his toga.” He, without thought, dropped all he was doing and went to the city. “He summoned all men of military age to gather with their equipment, marched out and won a great victory, and returned to Rome to celebrate his triumph. His chariot was preceded by the captured enemy commanders and followed by his soldiers with their booty. Cincinnatus then resigned his dictatorship. He had been in office for just 15 days.” Not only did this man complete his civic duty and triumph over his enemies, but he rested his power as soon as he could in order to hinder any exploitation of authority. This would promote the memory of him “as a model of the ideal Roman.” This story may be true, it may be different, or it may have been written during strife in Roman society at a much later date, but Cincinnatus was a person that Rome wanted its citizens to be nonetheless. His message would go on to inspire people many years…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Only Crime Is Pride

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Creon’s pride effects many of the decisions that he makes as a ruler. His dignity makes all the decisions very biased, including in scene 3 when he is arguing with his son Haimon. His son tells him…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient history is full of conquerors that can be attributed as excellent commanders, but none can compare the might of Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar. For one conquered the whole of the then known world and the other laid the foundations of the mighty Roman Empire. Although Alexander and Caesar had contrasting early part of their lives, reason being that one was a ruler and the other politician. It is generally the later part of their lives which signifies and compares them; they made great conquests, and that was possible not only because of their generalship and bravery, but the luck they had and inspiration they got from different figures in history. However, it was later to prove that the political life of Caesar proved to be much harder than the independent nature of Alexander.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Commentary: Caesar shows arrogance by going to the senate after Calpurnia warned him. After Decius messes with his ego and tells him that he would let a girl hold him back it made Caesar show his arrogance after Decius plays with his ego since he doesn’t want to be intimidated.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays