Preview

Einstein's Four Norms Of A Scientific Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Einstein's Four Norms Of A Scientific Revolution
Although Albert and Christi were wrongly advocating for this discovery, they do have validity in the way they approached this topic to the scientific community. Firstly, Albert’s comment “A groundbreaking discovery is treated as a measurement error simply because scientists are unwilling to question their dogma” is based off of Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. The current paradigm of this time was that the fastest particle on Earth travels at the speed of light. A paradigm dictates the methods and boundaries regarding what is studied in the scientific community. This proposed discovery defies the established paradigm of Einstein’s theory of relativity and would have lead to backlash according to Kuhn’s six steps of a scientific revolution. …show more content…
According to Merton, the four norms that control science include universalism, communism, organized skepticism, and disinterestedness. Ereditato violated the norm of organized skepticism because he jumped to the conclusion that he was “confident of the results” before the final data was collected. Ereditato did not wait to share the progress before all of the data was collected and his judgment proved incorrect. Since the physicists working on CERN shared their work with the scientific community, they followed the norm of communism. Merton would have agreed that universalism was maintained throughout this process. The physicians working for the European Organization for Nuclear Research are not as qualified as Einstein, as he is one of the greatest scientists to live. However, their contribution was taken seriously and was not simply dismissed due to their qualifications compared to Einstein. If the data turned out to be accurate, this theory developed at CERN would have dismissed Einstein’s theory, which proves that universalism did apply. Lastly, Ereditato did follow the norm of disinterestedness. Ereditato accepted the fact that the results were a product of a measurement error even though this contradicted his earlier statement and lead to him being forced to step down. Ereditato’s priority was towards the advancement of the scientific community, rather than personal gain from this potential discovery. The fact that Ereditato increased the scope of his scientific observation to find this error furthers Popper’s concept of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4. Why would the experiments run by Redi, Spallanzani, and Pasteur be considered as a possible basis for a theory?…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    aggressively went after science as well. One monk, Giovanni Ciampoli, even wrote to Galileo saying,…

    • 901 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Albert Einstein wrote in a letter in 1915 about the most common ways a scientist makes mistakes. These were that they created a false hypothesis or that their arguments are invalid or not logical. Many people agreed with this and many also disagreed, arguing that every science makes mistakes and that Einstein himself made these same mistakes on multiple…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How did new theories in physics and psychology in the period from 1900-1939 challenge existing ideas about the individual and society?…

    • 1229 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although most of the Catholic Clergy disapproved of any scientific findings, some influential members of the church enjoyed and accepted the discoveries. John Calvin, a French Protestant…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opposed attitude towards science was slowly changing. The Holy Office granted an imprimatur to the work of Canon Settele in 1822; Copernicanism was presented as a physical fact instead as a hypothesis. On July 3, 1981, Paul II appointed a commission to study and publish all available documents relating to the trial. Pope John Paul II said, “That it would be imprudent (unwise) or unreasonable to reject it”, that a scientific discovery should not be rejected if it can be proven right (Cowell). In a letter to the Director of the Vatican Observatory, he went on to say, “Science can purify religion from error and superstition; religion can purify science from idolatry and false absolutes.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Einstein’s letter to the President” Einstein explains his important perspective on uranium and his responsibility for the scientific and political situation of his time.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The biggest equation to come out of Einstein's theory of special relativity is E = mc^2, which tells us how E, the energy, M, the mass, and C, the speed of light, are related to each other. This mass we are using is not the same as weight. An object's mass is how much stuff is inside of it, while its weight is how hard gravity is pulling on it. This is why when you measure your weight in outer space, it is close to zero.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Einstein Vs Phyllis

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Einstein approached answering the broad question by using his personal opinion. He said, “Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suppose an empirically successful accepted theory T, and its rival T’, which is equally empirically successful, but makes claims that are quite different from those of T about the ‘deep structure’ of the universe (Worrall, 2011). As such, the theories make all the same predictions about what’s observable, but differ in regards to what is unobservable. In light of the evidence, the realist must then consider both theories as equally good, and thus by supposition, they are rivals and both cannot be considered to be true. However, in the case of the constructive empiricist, empirical adequacy is the only rational candidate for the belief involved in a theory’s acceptance and as such underdetermination does not effect their position. Consider the two most prominent theories in contemporary physics: the general theory of relativity and the quantum theory. These two theories are considered not absolutely inconsistent yet they are mutually incompatible (Worrall, 2011). The quantum theory states that everything is quantised, while the general theory does not consider space-time to be quantised. The general theory states that all laws are covariant, but the quantum theory is not a covariant theory. So which is seen to be true from the perspective of the scientific realist? This example illustrates the threat that underdetermination…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Einstein report

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Einstein then continues on to create his idea of logos, which he created by supplying a counterargument. “Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the actions of people.” By stating this, Einstein concedes to the controversy of scientists with no religious beliefs. However, while conceding with the scientists that believe in the laws of nature, Einstein was concurrently supporting his own statement…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rhetorical essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Einstein himself, who is generally revered as one of the greatest scientists in the scientific pantheon, had even remained uncertain of his own theory until it was proven empirically correct. And Barry likewise makes it clear to his readers that to believe exclusively in the “process of inquiry” is, above all else, a prerequisite for…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chem

    • 2418 Words
    • 10 Pages

    • An experimental result has no standing until it is disseminated to the rest of the scientific community…

    • 2418 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries changed the way educated people looked at the world. A new tone of thinking emerged creating a foundation that would later be built on by enlightened thinkers. Controversial views would soon challenge faith-based ideals, which in turn would test the power and authority of the church. No longer did people listen to beliefs from the past, people looked at new ideas of the future, ideas that made mathematical and logical sense. These new theories opened people's eyes to a new era, the Enlightenment. While architecture, philosophy, science, mathematics and freethought were restricted during the Scientific Revolution, enlightened thinkers freed themselves from religious dogma, allowing for the expansion of human knowledge at a rate never seen before. During the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment period, philosophers believed in breaking away from the established views of the church in order to…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Revolution

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    These scientific observers were surprised to find that their conclusions did not always match up with the accepted truths, and this finding inspired others to delve further into the study of the world around them. Scientific study quickly extended from the earth to the heavens, and Nicolas Copernicus, upon examining the records of the motions of heavenly bodies, soon discarded the old geocentric theory that placed the Earth at the center of the solar system and replaced it with a heliocentric theory in which the Earth was simply one of a number of planets orbiting the sun. Though this scheme seemed to comply better with the astronomical records of the time, Copernicus had little direct evidence to support his claims. Not ready to abandon traditional beliefs, the forces of tradition, in the form of the Church and the mass of Europeans, kept the heliocentric theory from achieving full acceptance. The theory awaited the advancement of mathematics and physics to support its claims.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays