Egoism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

Utilitarianism versus Egoism Taken from the ideals of normative ethics, traditions stemming from the late 18th and 19th centuries, John Stewart Mill and Jeremey Bentham conclude that an action is right if it in turn promotes happiness and an action is bad or wrong if it produces the opposite effect of happiness. They both conclude that the actions of these individuals will affect not just the individual themselves but it will affect that of everyone involved by the decision made. Utilitarianism is a more sound and logical theory of philosophy because it has more dynamic properties that relate to the human nature than that of Egoism. This negates the idea that one will pursue his or her own self-interest, even at the expense of others. Utilitarianism is an effort to provide an answer to an age old question; what should man do? It is popular belief within the realms of philosophy, that one should act to produce the best consequence possible and in assessing the cause and effect of actions made by man, it acts on the theory of intrinsic value or an end-in-itself. Mankind is psychologically different
Hedonist, such as the philosophers discussed in this text, analyze a balance of happiness as an equilibrium of pleasure over pain. They believed that these emotional responses alone are of intrinsic disvalue and value. Using these ideas, hedonist can compare the products produced by two different situations and determine which of the two would have better consequences. We should hold each other to a standard and through a system based on utilitarianism, we should create a point system of summing up units of pleasure and pain for those who might be affected and then determine a best course of