Effects of Computer Use on High School Students’ Sense of Community MERVYN J. WIGHTING
Regent University, Virginia
ABSTRACT The author used a mixed-method design to determine whether and how use of computers in the classroom affects sense of learning in a community among high school students (N = 181). The results indicate that using computers in the classroom positively affects students’ sense of learning in a community. Analyses revealed that students believed that connectedness with their peers is the most important variable in developing a sense of community. Results suggest the following policy implications for urban education: (a) use of computers in teaching may add to the sense of classroom community and (b) sense of community is important and may be linked to academic success. Key words: computers, sense of community, high school education
echnological innovation has become a commonplace phenomenon and is frequently taken for granted by contemporary society. In everyday life, technology plays an ever-increasing role; innovations, such as cellular telephones, hand-held computers, automatic teller machines, and digital videodisks, quickly become incorporated into daily use and are added to society’s vocabulary. Information is available in far greater quantities than ever before, and the means to access and share it with others is unprecedented. Because the pace of sophisticated technological change is so rapid, however, little is known about its effect on the society that it pervades. The classroom is a microcosm of society, and technology is having an increasing impact in schools throughout the country. In the same way that little is known about how technology affects communities in general, little is yet known about the effects that increased use of technology is having on school communities, in particular, on the sense of community of classroom learners. Sense of Community The concept of community has received considerable interest in recent years in the United Sates, and related research has increased. Despite concerns of some community psychologists over the erosion of the sense of community, and 371
its description by Sarason (as cited in Lounsbury & DeNeui, 1996) as the “overarching value” of community psychology, it was not until the mid-1980s that McMillan and Chavis (1986) proposed an operational definition of community. Their definition describes community as (a) a feeling that members have of belonging, (b) a feeling that members matter to one another and to the group, and (c) a shared faith that members’ needs will be met through their commitment to be together. Hill (1996) concluded that psychological sense of community refers to variables beyond individual relationships, that it appears to be setting specific, and that aspects of the concept differ from setting to setting. One such setting is the classroom. The sense of community among the students within a classroom is important. The construct is related closely to research by Glynn (1981) and Royal and Rossi (1997), who argued that common goals and values are essential elements of community, and by Strike (2004), who theorized that normation (i.e., the willingness of students to internalize group-shared expectations), is an important aspect of a learning community. Learning is assisted if students believe that they belong to the community or group that makes up a class and if they contribute to, and benefit from, that classroom community. Interpersonal relationships also are enormously important in a community of learners. The less a person understands the feelings and behaviors of others, the more likely he or she will act inappropriately or insecurely and fail to gain acceptance within the community (Gardner, 1983). Cooperative learning is an important component of the sense of classroom community. Johnson and Johnson (1992), Kagan (1994), and Slavin (1991, 1995) contributed to a considerable body of research that supports the...
References: Allen, R. (2001). Technology and learning: How schools map routes to technology’s promised land. ASCD Curriculum Update, 1–3, 6–8. Chin, W. W., Salisbury, W. D., & Gopal, A. (1996). Perceived cohesion in groups: A confirmatory factor analysis of the dimensions of belonging and morale. Retrieved August 9, 2005, from http://faculty.cob.ohiou.edu/ salisbury/research/cohesion.html Combs, K. A. (2000). Factors influencing the implementation of technology in a magnet high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Baylor University. Flesch, R. (1949). The art of readable writing. New York: Harper. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks. Glynn, T. (1981). Psychological sense of community: Measurement and application. Human Relations, 34, 789–791. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books. Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect: How computers affect our children’s minds—for better and worse (pp. 17–35). New York: Simon & Schuster. Hill, J. L. (1996). Psychological sense of community: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 431–438. Hiltz, S. R. (1998, November). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities. Paper presented at 1998 World Conference of WWW, Internet, and Internet Proceedings, Orlando, Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427705) Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992). Encouraging thinking through constructive controversy. In N. Davidson, & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning (pp. 120–137). New York: Teachers College Press. Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning. Lounsbury, J. W., & De Nieu, D. (1996). Collegiate psychological sense of community in relation to size of college/university and extroversion. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 381–394. Maddux, C. M., Johnson, D. L., & Willis, J. W. (1997). Educational computing: Learning with tomorrow’s technologies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 315–325. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23. Morrison, G. R., Lowther, D. L., & DeMeulle, L. (1999). Integrating computer technology into the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Newborough, J. R., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Psychological sense of community, 1: Foreword. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 3–4. Pretty, G. M., Conroy, C., Dugay, J., Fowler, K., & Williams, D. (1996). Sense of community and its relevance to adolescents of all ages. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 365–379. Relan, A. (1992, February). Motivational strategies in computer-based instruction: Some lessons from theories and models of motivation. Proceed-
July/August 2006 [Vol. 99(No. 6)]
ings of selected research presentation at the 1992 Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED348017) Roblyer, M. D., & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. A. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50–54. Rovai, A. P., & Grooms, L. D. (2004). The relationship of personalitybased learning style preferences and learning among online graduate students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 30–47. Rovai, A. P., & Lucking, R. A. (2000, September). Measuring sense of classroom community. Paper presented to Learning 2000: Reassessing the virtual university, Roanoke, VA. Rovai, A. P., & Lucking, R. A. (2003). Sense of community in a higher education television-based distance education program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 5–16. Rovai, A. P., Lucking, R. A., & Cristol, D. (2001). Sense of classroom community index. Unpublished manuscript, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA. (Copyrighted instrument inquiries should be sent to: email@example.com) Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J. (1997). Schools as communities. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED405641) Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change (pp. 5–110). New York: Addison Wesley. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Siegle, D., & Foster, T. (2000, April). Effects of laptop computers with multimedia and presentation software on student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442465) Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–82. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Strike, K. A. (2004). Community, the missing element of school reform: Why schools should be more like congregations than banks. American Journal of Education, 110, 215–232. Susman, E. B. (1998). Cooperative learning: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18, 303–322. Todman, J. B., & File, P. E. (1990). A scale for children’s attitudes to computers. School Psychology International, 1, 71–75. Waxman, H. C., Lin, M. F., & Michko, G. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Learning Point Associates. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects2 Wilson, B., & Lowry, M. (2000). Constructivist learning on the web. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 88, 79–88. Yaverbaum, G. L., & Ocker, R. J. (1998, November). Problem solving in the virtual classroom: A study of student perceptions related to collaborative learning techniques. Paper presented at the 1998 World Conference of WWW, Internet, and Internet Proceedings, Orlando, Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427750)
Please join StudyMode to read the full document