Preview

Effectiveness of the Three Strikes Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Effectiveness of the Three Strikes Law
The definition of the three strikes law is as follows. The third conviction for a felony results in a mandatory and lengthy prison term as defined by the American justice. This research paper will exclusively be written to follow the guidelines of the Caliornia version of the “three strikes and you’re out law” The exact application of the three strikes laws vary considerably from state to state. Although over twenty-three states have a three strikes law and many others have similar laws, none are as strict or as controversial as California’s version. (Three strikes law n.d) The history of the practice of imposing longer prison terms on habitual offenders than on first time offenders who commit the same crime is nothing new For example New York state has a persistent felony offender law that dates back to the late nineteenth century. Other states have habitual offender laws and recidivists statues on the books for years before the first true three strikes law with virtually no exceptions provided was enacted in Washington in 1993 when voters approved initiative 593 establishing the official “three-strikes law” (1) mandating that criminals who are convicted of most serious offenses on three occasions be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. California followed one year later in November of 1994 when the people overwhelmingly voted proposition 184 and enacted their own version of the law. (2) The law states that “a person who committed one prior violent or serious offense (the “first strike”) and who committed any new felony could receive twice the normal prison term for the new felony. (The “second strike”) a person who committed two or more prior violent or serious felonies (a “second striker”) and then committed any new felony (the “third strike”) would automatically receive an indeterminate sentence of twenty five years to life in prison. (Three strikes n.d) Is this law ethically sound or morally unjust? Proponents of three strikes argue that


References: No author (n.d) retrieved on June 8, 2009 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_strikes_law No author (2005 February 22) Three strikes law retrieved on June 8, 2009 from http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/3strikes.html No author (2002 March 17) 10 reasons to oppose 3 strikes your out retrieved on June 8, 2009 from http://www.aclu.org/crimjustice/gen/10141res20020317.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A longer prison sentence is nothing but a joke to the common criminal, with jails and prisons being so “comfortable” now. Any criminal that keeps his or her head down and their nose clean can get any sentence cut in half for “good behavior.” Not to mention the entire system is too crowded as is and society knows it.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three strikes statutes are seen as a way to combat the nation 's crime problem. After Polly Klass was…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Levinson, D. (Ed.). (2002). Encyclopedia of crime and punishment. (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Three Strikes Law is actually known in most states as habitual offender laws. Most people are still unaware the law exists, “Though the practice of increasing penalties for repeat offenders is fairly common and well-established, the modern Three Strikes Law first appeared in the early 1990s in Washington State"(Totalcriminaldefense.com). California followed suit shortly after Washington, most believe this was due to a convict who had already committed two felonies then when he was released committed murder. California is actually one of the strictest states when it comes to enforcing the Three Strikes Law. According to attorney, Sarah Garvey, about one in four inmates in the overcrowded California state prison system is a "striker"(Shouselaw.com).There still is no evidence that this law has reduced crime in anyway.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 7 Assignment

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Schmalleger, F. (2006). Criminal law today: An introduction with capstone cases. (3rd Ed.). Prentice Hall.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to The American Heritage Dictionary, law is defined as the principles and regulations established in a community by some authority and applicable to its people, whether in the form of legislation or of custom and policies recognized and enforced by judicial decision or the controlling influence of such as rules that the condition of society brought about by their observance (481). However, there is a very unique law that borrowing its name from baseball. Which is the three strikes law, it imposed mandatory minimum sentences for individuals who have been convicted of three felony crimes that were committed on three separate occasions. According to Bazelon, the ideology behind the three strikes law is that individuals who commit more than two felonies are chronically criminal and therefore pose a threat to society. Three strikes law advocates, as a fair punishment and a benefit to society, thus view incarcerating these individuals for lengthy prison terms or the rest of their lives (2). In 1974, Texas was first state that enacted three strikes law. Following year, Washington enacted and California, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, North Dakota enacted in 1994. Furthermore, in 1995 and 1996, fifteen states are also enacted the three strikes law (Crane 1). As crime and violence increased in the United States, citizens began to feel powerless. Terrorized in their own neighborhoods by criminals, who go in and out of the legal system, people began to believe there was no justice for them. Ironically, many people feared so much the gangs, drug dealers, pushers, and hustlers of the streets. An enormous outcry came about, requesting the government to fix the increasing crime rate. The answer to this dilemma came in the form of the three strikes law. According to Jabali-Nash, proposition 184, also known as the three strikes law, was passed on November 9, 1994. The proposal had portion of the population supporting it at the ballot boxes. With a 75…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The issue at hand is the question whether this act is really as effective as it is made out to be. Convicted felons are given two more chances to straighten up their acts and get their lives together to be able to live and reside in society. I believe that people who are convicted of a serious crime the first go-round should be punish by the same seriousness as the crime in which he or she committed. If they are giving a second chance to make become civilized and they commit another serious crime, then that should be an automatic life imprisonment sentence. I do not believe that they should be given a third chance. Once someone who commits a crime, they have the potential to commit the same or even more severe crime. It should not have to take the law and criminal justice system three chances to realize that a convicted felon is unfit to live along side with civilians. With this being said, this “three strike” sentencing should be abolished.…

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three strikes raises important questions about how sentencing laws need to achieve public safety. How are such laws made? Who do they target? And why did Michael Reynolds and Mark Klaas start out as allies and end up as bitter political rivals.…

    • 5293 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Davis, Robert C., and Delmira Gonzalez. "Victim Advocates." Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment. 2002. SAGE Publications. 21 Mar. 2011. <http://www.sage-ereference.com/crimepunishment/Article_n442.html…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cole, G., Smith, C., & DeJong, C. (2014). Criminal justice in america (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.…

    • 257 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A mandatory sentence is one where judicial discretion is limited by law; those convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least a minimum number of years in prison. The most famous example of mandatory sentencing is the ‘three strikes and you’re out’ policy adopted first in California in 1994, and now more widespread in the USA. "Three strikes" laws require life imprisonment for a third criminal conviction, but other forms of mandatory sentencing are now being discussed and implemented in various countries. The British Home Secretary Michael Howard implemented a three strike policy in Britain in the mid 1990s, implementing a mandatory minimum three year sentence for a third conviction of burglary. Australia’s Northern Territory in 1997 introduced mandatory sentences of one month to one year for the third offence regarding property and theft. In the USA possession of more than a small amount of a drug is punished by a mandatory harsh sentence. Mandatory life imprisonment has also been proposed in the US Congress for a second sexual offence against children. The British government has proposed a mandatory five year minimum prison sentence for anyone convicted of carrying a firearm illegally. In addition to these mandatory prison terms, some countries employ a system of ‘mandatory restorative justice’, whereby the criminal has to apologize to the victim, rather than one of imprisonment.( Jacqueline Rose Claire College idebate.org)…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prison Overcrowding

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper will discuss prison overcrowding and what type of numbers have come about over the years when it comes to inmates being imprisoned. It will discuss the cost of a prisoner annually as well as the decision to add verses build when it comes to new facilities. The overcrowding in one particular prison will be touched on as well as whose responsibility it is for upkeep. It will discuss how funding plays a role in overcrowding as well as the “three strikes” rule in California and how big of an impact it has made on the prison system. Lastly, society’s choice to vote will be touched on as how large of a determining factor it is in overcrowding prisons.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    mandatory minimum sentence

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A mandatory minimum sentence occurs when judicial discretions are limited by law (Famm). Those who are convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least the minimum number of years depending on the offense. Amanda Dollak who received her criminal justice degree at CTU, states “Mandatory sentences require every individual to receive the same punishment for similar offenses, regardless of how much a judge may object to the sentence”. These mandatory sentencing laws however vary from state to state, and in other countries. In 1994 California introduced a policy called “3 strikes you’re out”, which meant after a third criminal conviction the arrested person would be sentenced to life in prison (Friedman 109). Soon after California enacted its policy, other states and countries also adopted similar policies. Since then other forms of mandatory sentencing have been established for example, in Britain the mandatory minimum sentence after a third conviction for burglary, is three years in prison (Carrillo). Today there are now mandatory minimum sentences for all types of crimes including possession of a weapon, drugs, and rape.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offenders who convict of three violent crimes be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Writer Stolzenberg Lisa in this article gives us the perspective of California’s three-strike law adopted in 1994. Compared to other states, with their own legislation, California has the toughest mandated sentencing because of the higher percentage of violent offenders. The reason why California uses this form is to lengthen sentences and deter crime, especially crime committed by repeated offenders. On the other hand, Lisa argues that policy of transmitting more people to prison and increasing sentences has been a complete deficiency in reducing felonies “they estimated that a fully implemented three-strikes law would reduce serious felonies between 22% and 34% and that about one-third of this reduction would be for violent crimes such as murder, rape, or aggravated assault.” (Lisa,1997) This show the measures have been tried in the past decade, but they have had no observable fallout on crime because more prisons have never been an effective solution to the crime problem. Due to more crime rates, the state reformed its constitutional law in which those who seriously commit a crime or felony should be mandated under the three-strike law. In the case of robbery, the judge gives any offender to serve in jail for the small amount of time.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays