Effective Use Of Stereotypes In Research

Many people have encountered stereotypes in their life. However, whether they have perpetuated them or have been assumed to fit one, people may not realize the effects that such stereotypes can actually have. Previous research has shown that priming for stereotypes has aversive effects on performing certain tasks. In the peer reviewed journal article, Predicting Performance Outcome From The Manner Of Stereotypes Activation and Stereotype Content, published in 2015, the authors conducted two studies to examine what kind of effects positive stereotypes and stereotypes in general, have on academic performance (1). For the first study, the researchers assessed the math skills of the participants, 69 Asian American female students, to see if the
The journal is published quarterly and focuses on research, advocacy, education, and policy within Asian American psychology. The Journal broadly defines Asian Americans as Americans of Asian and Pacific Islander ancestry in the United States and Canada (2). The intended audience for this journal is Psychologists and individuals interested in having a better understanding of Asian American individuals and communities, through research, practice, advocacy, education, and policy belonging to all areas of psychology and related disciplines(2). Overall, this article complies with the journal’s
Although they may seem like a compliment, being targeted for positive stereotypes is complicated and can result in both negative and positive consequences. Positive stereotypes can have detrimental effects when the one being stereotyped is aware. This research is valuable in providing support that stereotypes can do real damage. However, a limitation of this study is that it does not address the underlying process through which being stereotyped affects performance. Nonetheless, this is something that can be looked into in future research. Also, since the sample consisted of Asian Female students, these results are particularly significant to Asian Americans. Thus, it is highly logical that it is the Asian American Journal of Psychology. Another aspect discussed, was the IMRaD format. Even though the article had a modified version it was still easy to read, and it did not hinder the understanding of the article. Overall, Shih et al (2015)’s article is a trustworthy source that I would feel comfortable using as a