Effective Meetings

Topics: The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney, Management Pages: 5 (1768 words) Published: November 29, 2005
One of the biggest complaints about most organizations is meetings...they waste too much of our precious time. This is bad news for organizations. Meetings are important because that is where an organization's culture and climate perpetuates itself. Meetings are one of the ways that an organization tells its workers, "You are a member." If you have bad, boring, and time wasting meetings, then the people begin to believe that this is a bad and boring company that does not care about time. Likewise, great meetings tell the workers, "This is a great organization to be working for!" Also, remember that bad meetings lead to more bad meetings which cost even more money. Why are there so many bad meetings? Poor planning by the meeting's organizer and a lack of involvement by the participants. Many people have devoted a lot of time to making meetings work. They have developed some ground rules which can help you to get more out of meetings, in less time, and, often, with less stress. Electing someone to the position of "process leader" helps the focus. The process leader can defuse conflicts, keep the discussion moving, and encourage those who don't often speak up to participate more. It helps if at least one person in the group has been trained in process consultation. Some companies keep process consultants on staff, either part- or full-time, to help other departments' meetings over stumbling blocks. Be cautious that the process leader does not squelch helpful discussions or take sides, two errors of carelessness or inadequately training. "Problems" are often merely symptoms – sometimes of things which are easier to fix. Instead of going directly for a solution, get more information on the problem and try to think of anything else that could be causing it. Quality professionals call this root cause analysis. High-ranking people can help by ignoring their status during the meeting. Pulling rank during the meeting or seeking revenge for criticism afterwards, is sure to stop other people from contributing. (Most people do not realize they are doing this unless a trained and brave facilitator or process leader points it out). There should still be a clear leader, but the leader's function can change to encouraging people to express and discuss ideas (and maybe keeping the meeting on track and in focus). When some people do not contribute, they can be asked for their opinions (which should be rewarded, even if they are not on the money). Several techniques can help to generate ideas. One is to have a period where everyone makes suggestions, which are written down in clear view; nobody can criticize an idea, no matter how foolish it may seem. People can then explain their idea for a minute or two; after that, each idea is evaluated by the group, one by one. Sometimes, letting the staff solve problems without the store manager or owner can help them to think more creatively and work more effectively. Setting up task forces to deal with specific problems, and letting those task forces implement solutions, may be a fast and effective way to work; the power and involvement will also make the staff's jobs more rewarding. Some conflict is good, if arguments don't get personal and people aren't driven into a "this is my position" stance. Personal criticism may reflect tensions over another problem; and too little criticism may reflect fear or a sense that nothing real will come from the meeting. The best meetings have some criticism, but it's aimed at ideas, not people, and is grounded in problems with the ideas. If success depends on the cooperation of the people at the meeting, it's often best to let them decide, as a group, what ideas they'll use. If people have a hand in deciding policies or procedures, they have more of a stake in seeing them work. Involving people in decision-making can lower their anxiety; lower absenteeism; and raise the quality of their work. But the involvement must be real: unless the people can help to define...

Bibliography: McCann D. Team Management: Practical New Approaches. (1990) Mercury Books Division of
WH Allen & Co.
Daft, Richard L. Management Fifth Edition The Dryden Press. (1997). Goleman,
Michael and David Straus. How to Make Meetings Work! New York: Berkley Books, 1976.
Underwood, Amber. Effective Meetings. (1989) Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food,
Shelton, Marie M., Laurie K. Bauer. Secrets of Highly Effective Meetings. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Corwin Press, 1994.
Wanden, Joy A. Making Meetings Matter! Library Mosaics (2001): 8-12.
Burleson, Clyde W. Effective Meetings: The Complete Guide. (1990) New York: Wiley,
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Problems of Effective Meetings Essay
  • Effective Communication in a Business Meeting Essay
  • ILM M3.33 Effective meetings Essay
  • Planning an Effective Meeting Essay
  • Essay about M3.33 Effective Meetings for Managers
  • Essay on M3.33 Effective Meetings for Managers
  • Lead effective meetings Essay
  • Mm3.33 Effective Meeting for Managers Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free