Preview

Effective Justice Or Unnecessary Cruelty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Effective Justice Or Unnecessary Cruelty
Capital Punishment in the US: Effective Justice or Unnecessary Cruelty?

Lethal injection, electrocution, lynching, death by firing squad, the gas chamber; these are the five ways that the death penalty is still carried out in the United States. As brutal as these sound, it used to be much worse. In historical times, people used to be executed by crucifixion, boiling in oil, drawing and quartering, impalement, beheading, burning alive, crushing, tearing, and even stoning. The methods used today are meant to punish heinous crimes, and rid the earth these dangerous criminals, instead of the intentional torture that was inflicted by the historical approaches. Many Americans, especially those of a religious persuasion, …show more content…
Personally, I disagree with this opinion, for several reasons. I believe that it may be a cruel punishment, but a necessary one that fits some crimes. Also, even though it is true that the mistake of executing the wrong person can’t be corrected, this can be prevented by proper investigation before conviction. In this essay, I will be addressing the morality of this conviction, cost of death vs. life in prison, how effectively the death penalty deters criminals, the chance of irrevocable mistakes, as well as giving supporting arguments for both sides. Personally, I believe that the death penalty is the most effective form of punishment for some crimes, such as murders. The first argument I would like to address is the morality issue. In the article “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty: A Qualitative Approach”, Falco and Freiburger state that “The crimes of rape, torture, and murder pivot on a moral code that escapes indisputable proof by expert testimony. Abolitionists may contend that the death penalty is inherently immoral because governments should never take human life, …show more content…
Once someone is killed for their crimes, even if their conviction is disproven, they cannot be brought back from the dead. This argument is legitimate, and could potentially happen. However, in this situation you have to consider the likelihood of a wrongful conviction, versus a deserved one. How many lives can be saved by putting murderers to death? According to me, the answer is quite a few. Also, the justice system can always be updated to ensure a fair trial, and emphasize the need for concrete proof in order to sentence someone to capital
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hanging, Lethal Injection, Electrocution
    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hanging, Lethal Injection, Electrocution

    Hanging, Lethal Injection, Electrocution, Gas Chamber, and Firing Squad are the five methods of execution that were used in the United States. The most commonly used method today in the United States is lethal injection. Only 36 states in the US are authorized to carry out executions (Ecenbarger, 2010).…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    Some suggest that Capital Punishment is not the way to go as sooner or later people will get killed because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system, for example witnesses, prosecutors and jurors them being human can all make mistakes (Alexander Pope) “To err is human”. When these human mistakes are coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes. Where capital punishment is used mistakes cannot be put right.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Timothy Mcveeigh The Death Penalty Essay
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Timothy Mcveeigh The Death Penalty Essay

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper
    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ACC/290 team paper

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Evil Actions of Danforth, Abigail and the Putnams
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Evil Actions of Danforth, Abigail and the Putnams

    The death penalty is only an act of vengeance. I am highly against capital punishment. Our constitution is supposed to protect all lives, even the lives of a criminal. Yes terrible and traumatic actions are committed, but it is strongly stated that there is still no right to murder the guilty. The death penalty is actually the most overlooked form of government hypocrisy. Why should the government murder people to show murder is wrong? Will there ever be an actual lesson to learn?…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong Analysis
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong Analysis

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty Timeline
    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Death Penalty Timeline

    B.) Introduction: There are 5 Forms of Execution that Past and Presently Implemented into Our Countries Capital Punishment System. These of which are Hanging, Electrocution, Firing Squad, Gas Chamber (asphyxiation), and Lethal Injection.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reinstating the Death Penalty in Canada
    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reinstating the Death Penalty in Canada

    The death penalty is also commonly known as and referred to as capital punishment. There are different methods as to inflicting the death penalty they are hanging, decapitation, electrocution, gassing, shooting and lethal injections. These are the most commonly used methods. Capital punishment is the execution, by the state, of those found guilty of a crime as stated in the Canadian law. In Canada the penalty was restricted to a small number of very serious crimes, such as treason and murder. The method used was hanging from the year of 1867 and on. The last capital punishment hanging in Canada took place in 1962 (Bain). During the time period between 1867 and 1962, 710 people were executed in Canada (Canadian Encyclopedia). The reinstating of the death penalty at this time will not act as a deterrent of crime and is more an act of retribution. The reasons as to why it should not be restored are that executions are a form of retribution that defeats the purpose of the justice system, innocent people are sometimes executed under false accusations, and because it does not act as a deterrent to society and crime.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Positive Effects Of Sentencing
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Positive Effects Of Sentencing

    Many look upon this topic as a religious moral issue. The National Coalition against Death Penalty states that “the death penalty devalues all human life- eliminating the possibility for transformation of human spirit.” This organization also states that the death penalty “is fallible and irrevocable” , their studies show that over 100 inmates have been released from death row after new technological testing regarding their cases found them to be innocent.(1) On the reverse side of this religious outlook, there are those such as J. Melton that believe, the death penalty was started by God, himself when wrote in the bible, “He that killeth by the sword must be killed by the sword.”(Revelations 13:10). (2) There have been studies by Emory University professors, in 2003, state that each execution deters an average of 18 murders. A similar study in 2004 stated that it is believed that speeding up execution would strengthen deterrent effect. For every 2.75 years cut from time spent on death row it is said that 1 murder would be prevented. Another aspect of the death penalty is that of those who believe that rehabilitation is ineffective and capital punishment is the only punishments that is equivalent to some of the violent offenses committed and think that it is a way for closure for the families of the victims.(3) In my opinion, I believe that it is not just a…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cruel And Unusual Punishment
    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cruel And Unusual Punishment

    Approximately thirty-five years ago, only 16 countries had abolished the death penalty (“Death Penalty” 1). Today, the number stands at 104 (“Death Penalty” 1). The countries that do still have laws on capital punishment are abolitionists in practice, meaning that they have not executed anyone in over 10 years (“Death Penalty” 1). Every year, executions only take part in a few countries, and the United States is one of them. America is the only major western country that still executes its prisoners. From 2007-2011, the United States carried out 220 executions (“Death Penalty” 1). In fact, the frequency of executions in the United States is only matched by five other countries: China, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and North Korea (“Death Penalty”…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fkdfs
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fkdfs

    With now having knowledge of the death penalty and its history and what came out of it, we will now focus on the different execution methods and what they entail. “In Indiana prior to 1913, all executions were by hanging. From 1913 through 1994 all executions were by the electric chair. Since 1995, all executions have been by lethal injection. Current executions procedure is found at the Indiana code 35-38-6 and requires that the lethal injection execution takes place inside the walls of the Indiana state prison at Michigan City before sunrise.” (office, 1998) In the 37 states and federal government that currently have the death penalty statutes, five different execution methods are prescribed, and they are as followed: Lethal injection, Electrocution, Lethal Gas, Firing Squad, and Hanging. “The vast majority or jurisdictions provide execution by lethal injection. Twenty Jurisdictions provide the alternative methods of execution, contingent upon the choice of the inmate” (office, 1998)…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Should NOT Remain An Option In The Justice System
    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Death Penalty Should NOT Remain An Option In The Justice System

    Why would we kill people who kill people to show that killing remains wrong? Often times in the justice system, a suspect with a heavy crime brought against them, have a high chance of getting sentenced to the death penalty. Although many times the verdict comes back correct, what about the lives of the innocents? Their life became limited once they got wrongfully convicted. Throughout this paper I will explain why capital punishment should not remain an option in the justice law system with first, explaining how sometimes innocent peoples verdict can result in the sentencing to death; second, the wrong message the death penalty sends to society; and third, a solution. In essence, the death penalty prove to have a high risk taking innocent lives.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty
    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty

    The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is an execution used as a punishment on someone convicted of a capital crime. There are several ways in which these executions have been or are being made. The most common is the lethal injection, others being electrocution, hanging, lethal gas, gas chamber, and/ or the firing squad under limited circumstances. The death penalty was first used in the U.S. in colonial times therefore leading to more than 900 executions since the year of 1976 in the U.S., with the state of Texas leading the nation (“At Issue”). There are many pros and cons that are discussed about this topic that are justifiable depending on the different points of view. Some people believe that the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper
    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Paper

    The death penalty in the United States is inflicted upon criminals by the state as punishment for an offence. This method of punishment dates back to the beginning of recorded history. Various primitive tribal histories indicate that the death penalty was a part of many ancient justice systems (Wikipedia). Nowadays, it is primarily used in cases where someone commits murder. Some people think that capital punishment deters crime and prevents convicted criminals from committing greater offences, but this idea is false. It has been debated for a long time because it is a poor way of punishing murderers. Execution in the United States violates human rights and is not the most effective way to inflict justice. Examination proves this point. The death penalty clearly violates human rights, is not an effective means of preventing other crimes and is very expensive.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?
    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?

    Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics