Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Edward O. Wilson's "Is Humanity Suicidal?".

Good Essays
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edward O. Wilson's "Is Humanity Suicidal?".
In the 1990s article, "Is Humanity Suicidal?", Edward O. Wilson is concerned about the extinction of the human species. He believes that humanity's harsh treatment of Earth will soon have excruciating consequences. Wilson also states that the increasing industrial world is having a very consequential affect on the global environment and that it may be too much for it to handle. He insists that "the human species is an environmental abnormality," because human's negative impact on the earth is likely to threaten the survival of the human species.

Wilson asks "Who can safely measure the human capacity to overcome the perceived limits of the Earth?" The limits of the Earth's natural resources and the Earth's ability to sustain itself from humanity's rough treatment is unknown. Wilson believes that there are two different perspectives for the future of the human species, which are exemptionalism and environmentalism.

There are people who fail to recognize environmental issues for what they really are. These are the exemptionalists. They see these problems as very minor. Wilson believes that these people think that environmental problems will soon disappear with the growth and advancement of technology. He believes that these people are too caught up with their own lives and the present that they fail to think about what could be waiting for their ancestors in years to come.

Then there are the environmentalists, in which Wilson has a strong belief in. Wilson believes that humanity cannot remake in the Earth in its original form. The increasing human efforts to remake the earth and control the global environment for human use is causing too much change in the environment that Earth soon my not be able to support the survival of the human race, therefore humanity's intelligence can be somewhat of a weapon to there own survival.

Wilson asks if population growth and human control over the environment proves that "humanity is suicidal". Wilson argues that we are not destined to destroy ourselves by trying to control the environment, so therefore we are not suicidal. He believes that humanity is "smart enough and have time enough to avoid an environmental catastrophe of civilization-threatening dimensions." Wilson also holds the belief that in order to preserve our environment that we must realize that humans are not the only organisms in the ecosystem that helps keep the environment livable; every organism plays their part. With the constant reporting of the extinction of species because of our harsh treatment, the jobs that the different organisms have to our environment are now lost. He argues that the Earth is too complicated in order for one species to be bale to control it.

Wilson concludes that we have around 50 to 100 years to straighten out our environment and to develop different values and ways of thinking. If the human's negative impact on the Earth increases it will result in the fall of our global, industrial civilization.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wilson uses invective language as a satirical element in his two passages. The People-First Critics call the Environmentalists, “greens, enviros, environmental extremists, or environmental wackos.” The Environmentalists call the People-First Critics, “anti-environmentalist, brown lashers, or wise users”. These names are very critical, and come off as childish. Perhaps,…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to the future of our planet because he explains how humans are poisoning the earth. Humans are…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    why a relationship between nature and the human race is no longer important, supporting his…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The history of humanity has always been in relation to evolution and progression. Humans went from one invention to another to lead up to the twenty-first century, doing anything to get humanity ahead. Subsequently, this lead to the environment being sacrificed for the temporary benefit of humans. In Ronald Wright’s book A Short History of Progress the consequences of peoples’ choices are explored and utilized as a warning to change the course humanity is currently taking. Through Wright’s sentiments in his work, Diane Cardwell’s article “Off Long Island, Wind Power Tests the Waters” can be viewed as a representation of the central message of this piece. This is apparent through its discussion of progress in regards to the environment and…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rate of loss is instead accelerating.” Right now the earth has about 15% of Earths land and 2.8% of the Earths oceans as reserved purely for biodiversity, Wilson wants to bring that to 50%. While he is realistic in understanding that no one will just automatically give up ownership of their own land, believing that 50% of earth can “be allowed to exist unharmed (pg 189)" is a bit unrealistic. With the growing population, how are we suppose to find space for everyone if we cut down the amount of space available for human use. He writes “the key to saving one-half of the planet is the ecological footprint, defined as the amount of space required to meet all of the needs of an average person (pg 189), but he doesn’t really detail as to how we can lessen the ecological footprint of a person.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ketcham’s article brings light upon the harsh truth that the world is incapable of handling itself along with the growth of human consumption. Humans are proud of their innovations in earth, but it is costing the planet. The authors of Limits affirms this when they argued that “‘The application of technological solutions alone has prolonged the period of population and industrial growth, but it has not removed the ultimate limits to that growth’" [1]. I agree with this quote. For example, in a recent article I read, scientists have figured out how to essentially “hack” a better environment— a process called solar geoengineering. Although it proved to be beneficial to the environment, the scientist asserted that there will be less incentive…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson starts writing to a pastor that he feels the two of them are friends and he also tells the pastor that he grew up in the same religion as him. Wilson also notes that they are both Americans, more specifically Southerners. Wilson the goes on to mention the key difference between them. The pastor takes the Christian Holy Scripture literally and rejects the conclusion of Science. While Wilson is an atheist who takes a scientific approach and believes that people evolved from Apes. Though they have different beliefs, both Wilson and the pastor like everyone else in the world strive for the same imperatives of security, freedom of speech, personal dignity, and a cause to believe in. Wilson then proposes that no matter their beliefs they both need to spend time to help the environment. Scientist predicts that by the end of this century half of the plants and animals will become extinct. Wilson needs the pastor’s help because Religion and Science are the two most powerful forces in today’s world. Wilson says that almost none of the Religions have worried about Nature. Some Religions believe in the book of Revelation that a second coming of Christ will be soon and therefore they don’t have to worry about the Nature because they will all be taken to heaven. Charles Darwin even started out as a minister who referred to the bible with everything. But early on his voyage to Brazil he said, “It is not possible to give an adequate idea of the higher feelings of wonder, admiration, and devotion which fill and elevate the mind.” Wilson is familiar and heartened by the Christians way of talking about Creation. Wilson then says that even though their belief on Creation is different they can come together because they share a common purpose to help protect and save the environment and Nature.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The recent hurricanes, Katrina and Rita, along with global warming amplify Jared Diamond's thesis in "The Last Americans" that humans are responsible for the downfall of civilizations. Throughout history, many civilizations have collapsed due to numerous reasons such as incompetent leaders and environmental negligence. Many people view the United States' current environmental crisis with apathy. These people feel that the environmental collapse of ancient societies such as the Mayans is only pertinent to the present day decline of distant countries such as Somalia and Afghanistan; but in fact the United States is being equally affected. Diamond suggests that the future of the country lies in our hands and not in some intangible force that surrounds us.…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pollan also brings up the issue that argues no matter what people do, no individual personal choices can not do enough to make an impact. What is also needed is laws and money, along with countless of little everyday choices people can make to save the planet. The problem with society is the Cheap energy, that is keeping people from going green. So the question is Why Bother, if all these other factoring issues are in the way of a person trying to make a difference? Well Pollan says, " If you do bother, you will set an example for other people. If enough other people bother, each one influencing yet another in a change reaction of behavioral change, markets for all manner of green products and alternative technologies will prosper and expand." Another way a person can make a difference according to Pollan, is to plant a garden which he claims is one of the most powerful thing an individual can do. Pollan's whole point of bothering to make a change is because he can and also because he has the ability to spread an effect on other…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "The Obligation to Endure," Rachel Carson explains how man is destroying earth because of the advancements in science, along with the continuous use of numerous chemicals. During her essay, she points out to the reader that humans continue to use chemicals to produce our products since they like having the ability to manage the growth of the plants. Carson argues that the use of chemicals is damaging "poisoning" nature along with destroying our environment…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This willingness to reevaluate our basic understanding of nature must occur on a far larger scale in order to bring about any real effects in political policy reform and individual practices and overcome the individualistic attitude that pervades our society and has caused a detachment from our environment and its subsequent…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nacerima

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We are destroying our environment only to change our surroundings into what we think is more esthetically pleasing. I agree with Thompson’s evaluation of the Nacerima culture and behavior. We cannot exist on only man made products. By altering our environment we are changing the quality of the very things we need for our survival. Everything that we do has an impact on something else. The cars that we conveniently drive every day are contaminating the air in which we breathe. Not convinced? Just take a look at global warming. We are responsible.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quality of Life

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mankind finds itself engaged in what Prince Charles described as ‘an act of suicide on a grand scale’ [4], facing what the UK’s Chief Scientific Advisor John Beddington called a ‘perfect storm’ of environmental problems [5]. The most serious of these problems show signs of rapidly escalating severity, especially climate disruption. But other elements could potentially also contribute to a collapse: an accelerating extinction of animal and plant populations and species, which could lead to a loss of ecosystem services essential for human survival. These are not separate problems; rather they interact in two gigantic complex adaptive systems: the biosphere system and the human socio-economic system. The human population size now is above the planet’s long-term carrying capacity is suggested (conservatively) by ecological footprint analysis [18–20]. It shows that to support today’s population of seven billion sustainably would require roughly half an additional planet; to do so, if all citizens of Earth consumed resources at the US level would take four to five more Earths. Adding the projected 2.5 billion more people by 2050 would make the human assault on civilization’s life-support systems disproportionately worse, because almost everywhere people face systems with nonlinear responses [11,21–23], in which environmental damage increases at a rate that becomes faster with each additional person. This is why environmental protection must be prioritized over resource extraction; environmental damage will cause…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    43我二宫和也同仁堂

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. In “A Fable for Tomorrow” (pp. 123-124), Rachel Carson raises the serious issues of pollution and environmental protection. Select specific examples from Carson’s essay and essays by Sang Il Lee (“Our Earthly Fate”, pp.233-234), or David Suzuki (“Overpopulation Is Bad but Overconsumption Is Worse”, pp. 88-90), to present reasons why “The people had done it themselves” and discuss how in THREE ways human beings are suffering from consequences of their own irresponsible actions.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson predicts that our present course will lead to the extinction of half of all plant and animal species by 2100. Seven in ten biologists believe that mass extinction poses a colossal threat to human existence, a more serious environmental problem than even its contributor, global warming; and that the dangers of mass extinction are traumatically underestimated by almost everyone outside science.…

    • 361 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays