Preview

Economic Freedom In North America

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Economic Freedom In North America
Economic Freedom
North America has been referred to as a “land of opportunity” in the past; with the strong economies that both the United States and Canada have as well as the every growing industries in each country, it is no wonder that they have gained this reputation. But this begs the question, why are other countries not referenced in this way, particularly developed countries like Sweden? The answer quite simply boils down to economic freedom. “Economic freedom is the key to greater opportunity and an improved quality of life” (Economic Freedom). It is the way that each society operates and shows the differences between a capitalistic society (America) versus a socialistic society (Sweden). In further expanding on some of the various
…show more content…
The first subsection of economic freedom to be examined is business freedom. According to the Index of Economic Freedom, business freedom is, “a quantitative measure of the ability to start, operate, and close a business that represents the overall burden of regulation as well as the efficiency of government in the regulatory process.” Simply put, it is one’s ability to own and/or operate a business of their own freely. By freely, it means without too many constricting laws and rules enforced by the government. In a socialist society, this simply is not possible. Socialism emphasizes equality among all therefore it would be impossible for everyone to be equal if few owned large industries within the society. This is not to say that socialist societies live without businesses, rather the individuals living within this type of community cannot freely own a business. The responsibility falls to the government in order to keep the country economically stable while still not being driven by monetary gains. Because of this individuals businesses tend to be difficult to establish and even more challenging to close these enterprises. Contrarily, capitalist communities are extraordinarily free- in the business sense. This is because a capitalist society promotes hard work and innovations in order to create a stronger economy. It would be impossible for a capitalist society to survive without a plethora of businesses. This is because in a capitalistic society, businesses are not largely owned by the government therefore without an abundance of individual businesses the economy would weaken dramatically. As such, entrepreneurship is an ever growing field in which people are free to promote and share their ideas and products with the world. Organizations in these societies are easier to institute and, because of the abundance

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capitalism is an economic system where the government is hands off of businesses and people work to make profit, it is based off of private ownership. In document one of the DBQ, it states that capitalism is "based on the private ownership of capital, and on the production of goods and services for profit" (document 1). Even though it may sound like a good idea, many people were unhappy with capitalism because on lthe people who took the risk to invest money were wealthy and everyone else, for the most part was poor. The solution to these problems were new ideas of economic systems. Socialism was one idea. Socialism was an economic system where there is eocnomic equality and the government owns big industries. Documemnt four of the…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poli 330 Week 3

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socialism is when the state controls the means of production by manipulating prices of goods and wages of workers. Socialism also requires people to submit to the rule of law. In return for their compliance, citizens are provided with resources rationed by the government. In a socialist government you get pros like, free health care and other services provided. But with good comes bad, cons are high taxes, not as much incentive to work hard as in other systems. Excessive government regulation makes business slow and not very efficient. Let take Cuba for example, as an island Cuba needed to trade to live. As long as there was a community of socialist nations with whom it could enjoy favorable terms of trade, it was able to develop economically and raise its standard of living to a level that made it the envy of the rest of the Third World, a level that in areas such as health care and public education rivals industrialized countries like the United States. While its place in the international division of labor within the emerging socialist world system continued its role as an exporter of agricultural goods and minerals, the prices of these exports were indexed to those of imported industrial goods so that the labor value content of each were more nearly equal than you usually find. It was this unique equivalent exchange that has made economic development possible in Cuba since the revolution.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary principles of communist is that capitalism is characteristically awful and represented a risk to the common laborers. Meanwhile, “The capitalists believed there should be a free economy in which private individuals made most decisions” (Brookioh, 2012). The communists see every single entrepreneur country as conceivable foes. As indicated by them, capitalism will in the end crush itself and it is their obligation to help it along. They deny participation amongst themselves and capitalist countries ideologically.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Socialism is one of the roles of government in the economy. Adam Smith, who is the father of capitalism, believes in laissez-faire, "hands off" the government. He believes all production should be sale at the best possible lowest price. (Doc 5) While Adam Smith believes in capitalism, Engel is criticizing it. Engel believes the capitalism seizes everything for themselves but not the poor, they remain nothing. (Doc 7) Karl Marx, the author of a 23 page pamphlet, "The…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open competition and privately owned property are the key elements of , whereas, public ownership by the government and the elimination of competition to the state are key elements of . a. b. c. d. 2. That the U.S. capitalistic economy limits some areas of competition, and China’s socialist economy allows some free enterprise, indicates that a. b. c. d. 3. capitalism does not work. socialism does not work.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is an economic system where productions are privately owned and work for private profit. Private actors in the free market make decisions regarding supply and demand investments and prices. Investors who chose to make investments profit, workers get paid wages by businesses and companies. Free-enterprise is the freedom for private businesses to operate competitively for profit with minimum government involvement. An economic system determines what to produce, how to produce, and who will receive the production. In a capitalistic society some of the characteristics are the right to own private property, freedom of enterprise (own a business), and freedom of economic choices. Freedom of economic choices means you can work if you please or not work, spend or not spend. Capitalism also comes with a lot of competition many buyers and sellers with little control over price.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does the principle of economic freedom operate in the systems of capitalism, socialism, and the United…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the outside looking in, America, known as the land of opportunity, provides the greatest chance for progress and success. The land of the free provides equal opportunity for all who are willing to work for their piece of the American Dream. Or so it has been perceived.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whereas Socialism, according to the Marxists Theory, is something in-between Capitalism and Communism; A political and economic ideology where the government has almost complete control over trade, capital, land, and the production and distribution of goods. Thus encouraging the formation of a welfare state. In countries such as Cuba and other countries who employ Socialistic practices land is completely owned by the government, unlike America, where the majority of land is privately owned by the individuals of America. While some people will argue that capitalism is all about greed and has caused the inequality that is so frequently spoke of by politicians, protesters, and news and media outlets. Many think the solution to this inequality is to employ more Socialistic ideals, what some refer to as Marxism 2.0; however, as Socialism is European countries is proving, that is not the…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism Vs Healthcare

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socialism and capitalism are, without a doubt, two somewhat opposing economic thoughts and system. Most of the arguments that come up when debating about these systems center on equality and the role of government in our economy. Socialists' beliefs include the idea that inequality is inferior to the success of the economy and society, and that…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a communist society, all businesses are owned by the government. In a way, this can be good and bad. When, the government owns every business, every business is pretty much on the same level, and they each have the same amount of success. No matter what a business specializes in, the same amount of funding goes to each business, since each business is funded by the government. This plays in the concept of everyone having common…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “They might not like to admit it, but Europeans don’t mind a bit of capitalism,” says the author of a 2010 article in The Economist titled, “Charlemagne: Europe’s dark secret.”1 While France and some of its neighbors may give off an image of, “…contempt for free enterprise ,” Sweden has gone in an opposite direction. Swedish, free market education system, budget reform, and de-regulation of the market, show the scope of their capitalist nature.…

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Under a socialist economic system, businesses and industries can be state-owned or privately owned, depending on the country.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Free enterprise and private ownership--two essential characteristics of a free-market economy--remain part of a mixed economic system. Under such a system, individuals are free to own property and operate for-profit businesses. The specific level and extent of free enterprise varies across countries. Some nations, such as the United States, emphasize free enterprise and private ownership of industry, while other countries' systems involve state ownership of some industries, such as transportation, energy and utilities. In addition, privately owned industries may be subject to a variety of government regulations.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Development as Freedom

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These two reasons represent a linkage or connection among the different kinds of freedoms, and from here the idea of “Development as Freedom” has been derived. Not only freedom affects the development, but also markets play a great role in the process of development. As Adam smith noted, “Freedom of exchange and transaction is itself part and parcel of the basic…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays