Preview

Early Biological Theories

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
866 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Early Biological Theories
A detailed essay plan (with pictures) for Early Biological (sheldon and lombrosso)
• Nature nurture argument - Early biological theories support the nature side of the nature nurture argument because they assume that offenders have physical abnormalities were more commonly included in criminals

•Lombross presents the first biological theory where he basically states that individuals that indulged in crime were more likely to show physical abnormalities when compared to others than his control group which consisted of non-criminals.

•Social learning theorist bandura that basically argued that criminal behaviour is learned via vicarious reinforcement/ observation of negative role models. His research on children using the bobo doll demonstrated that the children were far more likely to be aggressive if they saw that for the same act an adult was getting rewarded.

•The second early biological theory was proposed by sheldon, he basically studied offenders in a rehabiliation centre and discovered that they were more likely to have a monomorphic body shape and extroverted personality.

•Another evaluation of this study is that these individuals might have been in the rehabilitaion centre just because they have been targeted more by the police and have been treated unfairly in court due to their appearance.

•Freud a psychoanalyst basically stated that failure during socialisation would lead to an underdeveloped superego meaning a lack of guilt for offending behaviour.

•Social learning explanations for crime. Bandora for example, argued that criminal behaviour could be learnt via observation, imitation and reinforcement, for example by watching violent video games. This was supported by the bobo doll study which demonstrated that aggression could be learnt rather than inherited like Sheldon claimed.

•More recent biological theories would state that by looking into the brain to explain criminality and not physical features. In america studies have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As with other theories within the criminal justice theater, multiple variables exist within the study of the biological theory. The following will examine those most researched.…

    • 29174 Words
    • 83 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is bad behavior displayed by citizens who reject societal norms and instead chose to commit crime. However, there are many types of theories of why crime occurs the most prevalent cause for crime involves the social environment of the criminal offender. Psychological theories discusses that these interruptions in childhood development is the cause for crime but because the delays developmental is the effect of the criminal’s environment. The same goes for biological theories that find genetic or biological factors that make a person more prone to become a criminal but require certain environmental factors for the person in reality to become a criminal.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminologist David Rowe was one of the primary leaders in a movement to bring the discussion of biology back to criminal justice which occurred in the late 1990's before this both biological and individual traits were largely ignored by criminologists. Now biological and individual traits are influential in large part due to Rowe whom published a book titled “Biology in Crime” in 2002. In this work Rowe contends that genetic factors affect individual traits due to their impact on the central nervous system and autonomic nervous system and that their is a physiological relation to a heightened amount of violence when these systems are thrown off and their is evidence that criminals may have deficits in the per-frontal cortex of the brain and their is an association between low…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albert Bandura’s theory looks at the way in which children and young people learn through observing and copying in a process called modelling. In the 1960’s, Bandura was able to show through a classic experiment that children would perform actions that they had previously seen an adult do. The experiment involved showing children a film of an adult with a large inflatable doll known as a ‘Bobo doll’. The first group was then shown a second adult either ignoring or encouraging the aggressive behaviour, while in the other group the second adult intervened to punish and stop the aggressive behaviour. Afterwards, the children were put into the room with the Bobo doll and the observations show that the children in the first group copied the aggressive behaviour, while in the second group, the children showed little aggressive behaviour towards the doll. The experiment concluded to show that children are influenced by adult’s…

    • 4433 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bandura’s Social Learning Theory suggests that acts of aggression are learnt through the observation of role models. His original “Bobo Doll” study showed that when exposed to aggressive behaviour small children copied this behaviour, not just by being physically aggressive but even copying the verbally aggressive behaviour. However this study focuses on children who are supposed to learn in this manner, this doesn’t demonstrate that this would also be true in older children or adults who already have a set moral compass that would interfere with copying aggressive behaviours. However Bandura’s later study showed that if children saw someone get punished for aggressive behaviour they were less likely to be aggressive themselves when they were allowed to play with the bobo doll but if they saw someone get rewarded for this aggressive behaviour then they were much more likely to act aggressively themselves, this shows that vicarious reinforcement is important to the learning of aggression through the social learning theory, as receiving direct positive reinforcement leads to people having high self efficacy making them very likely to repeat the aggressive behaviour that they were rewarded for. In terms of aggression this reward could come in many forms such as acceptance from a violent gang they want to be a part of or just attention from a parent or teacher. Moreover, Walter and Thomas' study in 1963 further supported this theory as the results of the study demonstrated that aggressive behaviour was a result of imitation of role models. However, the social learning theory does not explain what triggers aggression. Additionally, the study emphasises nurture and learning through observation - ignoring nature and biological explanations.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The biological determinism theory is best displayed during the time period between 1865 and 1890. The icon that best demonstrates biological determinism is Darwin. The mid to late 1800s was a crucial time period for biological determinism because Charles Darwin came up with his idea of “Origin of the Species” in 1859 which Darwin discussed evolution and help set up the stage for ideas that promote heredity and biology as causes of criminal behavior. Although Darwin did not directly state that biological traits could determine human behavior, many people concluded biological determinism theory after reading his book. This was also the time when Cesare Lombroso, an Italian doctor, began studying the bodies of criminals and developed the theory of “born criminal” (360degrees). After carefully examining the criminals’…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social learning theory can especially be seen in the behaviour of children, who look to others, models, to see how they should behave. Bandura proved this theory in his Bobo doll experiment, in which children watched an adult display unique, violent ways of playing with the Bobo doll (this covered both the attention and motivation steps, as the children were not distracted from observing the aggressive actions and could have been motivated to imitate them due to the older model behaving in such a way). When left alone in a room full of the same toys, the children, observed through a one way mirror, would display similar behaviours to that of the models, even repeating some of the phrases used by the adults in the demonstration, such as ‘Sock him in the nose’. As this was a fairly unique phrase, unlikely to have been heard by the children before, this shows us that the children learnt these phrases directly from the models, whose behaviour they had merely observed, which proves the social learning theory, it also shows that Bandura managed to operationalise how much the children learnt from the models. As well as this, there was no gender bias in Bandura’s research as the models were both male and female, although it was found that children were more likely to imitate the male. This could however be due to the role of ‘the…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People perceive that crime, primarily violent crimes, such as murder, is the most serious crime society faces in modern times. This has led to efforts by many research groups to attempt to find the cause of such criminal behavior. The focus of such research is biological issues with the belief that a biological basis in criminals does exist and that understanding biology is useful when attempting to predict the individuals who may be predisposed to criminal activity in the future. Research in the 1960s suggested that males with an extra Y chromosome were predisposed to more violent criminal behavior, although further research showed no data to support this theory. Recent research that has received widespread publicity that suggests a genetic and biochemical approach. The argument is that neither approach currently provides enough convincing evidence that criminal behavior is understandable in terms of biochemistry and genetics.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mednick, S., & Finello, K. (1983). Biological factors and crime; implications for forensic psychiatry. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6642820…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories Of Criminology

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The debate regarding criminality being a result of nature or nurture has been a topic of discussion both within criminology and outside of it for decades. Criminologists brought forward theories attempting to address and explain this paradox, and explanations for crime included psychological, sociological, economical, biological reasons, amongst…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bandura

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1963 psychologists A Bandura and Ross and Ross decided to hold a series of experiments to get a more in depth view of social learning and to try and conclude whether children imitated aggressive acts once they had observed them.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first evidence supporting Social learning theory is the well known experiment, conducted by Bandura himself, Ross and Ross in (1961) known as Bobo Doll experiment. In brief, the aim of the experiment was to see whether children would learn aggressive behaviour by observing others. There were three main conditions: two experimental (the aggressive and non aggressive) and one controlled. Aggressive condition was exposed to a video clip, where they saw a role model playing aggressively with an inflated (Bobo) doll (putting the doll on its side, striking…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Do individuals become criminals as a result of heredity or genetics or is it their environment that is in fact at play? This question has left Criminologists in debate for the better part of our modern era. In order to help answer this question we must first take a closer look at the concept of Nature vs. Nurture, a popular psychological term initially created by Darwin and other positivists. "Nature vs. Nurture" refers to internal and external factors that play a role in behaviour, in this case in reference to criminals. "Nature" is paired up with the biological explanation known as internal factors. "Supporters of the biological perspective argue that we must identify the role of heredity and the importance of biophysical, as well as biosocial…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    reunited with his natural mother and sister after spending three years in the Army, but the union…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are Criminals Mad or Bad?

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Appelbaum, P. S., (2005). Behavioral Genetics and the Punishment of Crime. Law and Psychiatry, 56 (1), 25-27.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays