Dutch Lady Proposal Milk industry ana
Executive Summary
This report was commissioned to evaluate the potential and feasibility of expansion in two countries: Australia and Indonesia. It furthers evaluate the method of expansion: 1) Export and 2) FDI that is most suitable for this endeavor.
Methods of analysis include: comparison of various indices, research on trade agreements, trade policies and trade incentives and scenario building.
Results of analysis pinpoints that while Australia is the better country to expand in, export is deemed unsuitable but FDIs would yield good return. It is also revealed that Indonesia may be unsuitable for either expansion but export still can be considered under certain circumstances.
It is recommended that Dutch Lady should choose FDIs in Australia as the path to expansion. The combination of a factory and export hub would be able to utilize all available resources and gives Dutch Lady a stronger foothold internationally.
1.0 Introduction
Dutch Lady Malaysia, a subsidy of Royal FrieslandCampina N.V is one of the leaders of branded milk in Malaysia and was the first milk company to be listed in Bursa Malaysia (Dutch Lady Milk Industries Berhad, 2014). The company values product innovation and the health of its consumers, developing the world’s first growing up milk and cutting sugar in milk by 65% are only some of the efforts undertaken by the company.
With an annual revenue of RM692 million in 2009, Dutch Lady is not only a mature firm in Malaysia with a stable customer base but have sufficient funds to consider expansion.
As such, much contemplation regarding which country to expand has narrow the possibilities down to two: 1. Indonesia. 2. Australia. As diverting resources to support both choices is too risky, a choice must be made between the two options. This report will evaluate both choices and two methods of expansion: export or foreign direct investment (FDI).
2.0 Australia
A unique and diverse nation with a 22.5 million population and governs a
This report was commissioned to evaluate the potential and feasibility of expansion in two countries: Australia and Indonesia. It furthers evaluate the method of expansion: 1) Export and 2) FDI that is most suitable for this endeavor.
Methods of analysis include: comparison of various indices, research on trade agreements, trade policies and trade incentives and scenario building.
Results of analysis pinpoints that while Australia is the better country to expand in, export is deemed unsuitable but FDIs would yield good return. It is also revealed that Indonesia may be unsuitable for either expansion but export still can be considered under certain circumstances.
It is recommended that Dutch Lady should choose FDIs in Australia as the path to expansion. The combination of a factory and export hub would be able to utilize all available resources and gives Dutch Lady a stronger foothold internationally.
1.0 Introduction
Dutch Lady Malaysia, a subsidy of Royal FrieslandCampina N.V is one of the leaders of branded milk in Malaysia and was the first milk company to be listed in Bursa Malaysia (Dutch Lady Milk Industries Berhad, 2014). The company values product innovation and the health of its consumers, developing the world’s first growing up milk and cutting sugar in milk by 65% are only some of the efforts undertaken by the company.
With an annual revenue of RM692 million in 2009, Dutch Lady is not only a mature firm in Malaysia with a stable customer base but have sufficient funds to consider expansion.
As such, much contemplation regarding which country to expand has narrow the possibilities down to two: 1. Indonesia. 2. Australia. As diverting resources to support both choices is too risky, a choice must be made between the two options. This report will evaluate both choices and two methods of expansion: export or foreign direct investment (FDI).
2.0 Australia
A unique and diverse nation with a 22.5 million population and governs a
References: Asia Regional Integration Center (2014) Free Trade Agreements [online]. Available from: http://aric.adb.org/fta-country [Accessed 13 June 2014]. Australian Government: Department of Agriculture (2013) Food Products [online]. Available from: http://www.daff.gov.au/biosecurity/import/biological/checklist/food [Accessed 10 June 2014]. Australian Government: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2014b) Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement negotiations [online]. Available from: http://www.dfat.gov.au/fta/tpp/ [Accessed 13 June 2014]. Australian Taxation Office (2012) Bloomberg (2014) Major World Currencies [online]. http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/currencies/ [Accessed 10 June 2014]. Business-in-Asia (2010). BENEFITS FROM ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA (AFTA) TARIFF CUTS [online]. Available from: http://www.business-in-asia.com/asia_freetrade.html [Accessed 12 June 2014]. Dairy Australia (2014). Milk [online]. Available from: http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/Markets-and-statistics/Production-and-sales/Milk.aspx [Accessed 10 June 2014]. Deloitte Tax Solutions (2012). Indonesian Tax Guide 2012 [online]. Indonesia: Deloitte. Available from: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Indonesia/Local%20Assets/Documents/Indonesian%20Tax%20Guide%202012.pdf [Accessed 9 June 2014]. Dutch Lady Milk Industries Berhad (2014) Company Profile. Available from: http://www.dutchlady.com.my/en/home.asp?page=company&subpage=comp_profile [Accessed 11 June 2014]. Duty Calculator (2014) Import Duty taxes when importing into Indonesia. [online]. Available from: http://www.dutycalculator.com/country-guides/Import-duty-taxes-when-importing-into-Indonesia/ [Accessed 13 June 2014]. European Commission (2013) Barrier Fiches Result [online]. Available from: http://madb.europa.eu/madb/barriers_details.htm?barrier_id=135440&version=1 [Accessed 12 June 2014]. FindtheBest (2014) Index of Economy Freedom listing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014) Feeding the World [online]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e03.pdf [Accessed 8 June 2014]. Global Business Guide (2013). Overview of Indonesia’s Dairy Industry [online]. Available from: http://www.gbgindonesia.com/en/agriculture/article/2012/overview_of_indonesia_s_dairy_industry.php [Accessed 12 June 2014]. Indonesia-Investments (2014) Unemployment in Indonesia [online]. Available from: http://www.indonesia-investments.com/finance/macroeconomic-indicators/unemployment/item255 [Accessed 12 June 2014]. National Wage and Productive Commission (2014) Comparative Wages in Selected Countries As of 31 March 2014[online]. Available from: http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/pages/statistics/stat_comparative.html [Accessed 11 June 2014]. PriceWaterCoopers (2010). Doing business in Australia: An introductory guide. [online]. Available from: http://www.pwc.com.au/legal/assets/GuideBusiness2011.pdf [Accessed 10 June 2014]. Stott D. A. (2008). The Japan-Indonesia Economic Partnership: Agreement Between Equals? [online]. Available from: http://www.japanfocus.org/-David_Adam-Stott/2818 [Accessed 12 June 2014]. The World Bank Group (2014a) Ease of doing Buinsess Index [online]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.BUS.EASE.XQ [Accessed 9 June 2014]. The World Bank Group (2014b) GDP [online]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD [Accessed 10 June 2014]. The World Bank Group (2014c) Inflation, GDP deflator [online]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.DEFL.KD.ZG [Accessed 9 June 2014]. Trading Economics (2014) Australia Unemployment Rate [online]. Available from: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/australia/unemployment-rate [Accessed 11 June 2014]. Transparency International (2014) Corruption Perception Index [online]. Available from: http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/ [Accessed 9 June 2014].