Preview

Drone Strikes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drone Strikes
Drone Strikes

After reading this article about the drone strikes and looking into other articles about drone strikes I am in favor of drone strikes that effectively hit the target without civilian deaths; (which is the major criticism of drone strikes) but not in favor of the power and strength our government is expressing while these strikes get used. These drone strikes are the centerpiece of the Obama administrations counter terrorism policy especially in Pakistan and Yemen. However though using these drone strikes as a part of our “counter terrorism policy” is hypocritical because like one the respondents to the article said “If Obama cannot understand that to wage terror is to invite terror then I for one can no longer believe in him.” This respondent is right, if America as a nation is going to be using these drone missile strikes on terrorists but end up killing a few civilians in the process is that moral? The continuous killing does not eliminate nor stop hatred towards the United States, in fact I think it makes the hatred stronger and other countries more inclined to recoil. Not only are these drone strikes not ethical or moral neither is this “disposition matrix” Obama has created to determine who will be executed (by drone strikes) without due process. This “kill list” Obama invented was started because he refused to detain terrorist suspects, instead his solution is to just kill them at will. This strikes several issues starting with our executive branch in this instance is over stretching not only their power but there right to act in this manner without going through proper policies. With this kill list keep getting added to either monthly or how ever often, is it even effective? Or just a way for the government to flex there power over the nation and too other nations. It’s a little of both in this circumstance, using drone strikes shows other nations we have the technology to strike all over the world whenever at the push of button,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Drone Usage in War-Time Tactics
    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drone Usage in War-Time Tactics

    Since the introduction of drones in war, the NY Times claims that the “CIA have not committed one civilian fatality, while allowing the troop death rate to decrease dramatically.” During the constant bettering of machinery throughout the world, the use of technology has come to a halt when it comes to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Slowly proving to be more reliable than the average pilot, in the years progressing new found respect has been shown by doubting militaries. In a HALE UAV article written by Carlos Reyes he states that “drones can fly up to 60,000 feet, being able to steadily winds at 15 mph compared to 50 mph winds at 40,000 feet.”(Reyes) and are able to outdo a pilot by almost 10,000 feet, due to the -75 degree weather. Portrayed by the US State Department as drones being useless, the use of drones has relentlessly grown to underestimated levels. A drone is classified as being “a UAV that is able to be controlled and sustain flight for numerous amounts of time, by a remote control”. The art of flying an attacking airplane remotely has made a strong peace appeal to not only the military but the citizens of the United States as well. By allowing the use of Drones in war time tactics, the innovation through this "technological leap" will help decrease in civilian deaths as well as increase in terrorist fatalities.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes
    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional
    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings
    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare Argumentative Analysis
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone Warfare Argumentative Analysis

    On April 12, 2016, the Coalition for Peace Action co-sponsored the Ethical, Moral, and Faith Implications of Drone Warfare conference at New Brunswick Theological Seminary. Alongside of the leadership by Robin Suydam, the Peace Coalition partnered with local Reformed Church in America congregations in order to bring attention to our Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare campaign. This event was highlighted by drone victims accounts as well as excerpts from leading drone warfare documentaries. The evening closed with a riveting speech by former army chaplain, Chris Antal.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques
    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

    It would seem that the Drone Campaign was activated in it's place as an effort to combat terrorism. Even though the first drone strike was ordered in 2004 it wasn't until after the enhanced interrogation program was abandoned that drone strikes rapidly increased. An estimated 51 strikes occurred during the Bush administration ending in early January of 2009. The first drone strike under the Obama administration occurred on January 23, 2009. By December of that year the CIA recorded it's 100th drone strike.8 An estimated total of 350 drone strikes9 have been ordered under the Obama administration resulting in at least 2,400 deaths10. With the question of morality it's hard to comprehend that there are those that believe drone strikes are more moral than EITs. Especially when looking into the fact that strikes are ordered on 'suspected' terrorists while EITs are performed on those working with or known to be terrorists. All that aside collateral damage needs to be taken into consideration as well. The act of EITs doesn't result in collateral damage whereas it does with drone strikes. Even if this is dismissed it would be hard for one to argue that drone strikes provide more intelligence than EITs. After all, how can a suspected terrorist provide information if he's dead? Because the drone campaign is now targeting suspected terrorists some believe the United…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theorizing The Drones Analysis
    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Theorizing The Drones Analysis

    Psychological effects of war happens all the time around us in different shapes and forms, whether we are aware of them of happening or not. Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card and the article “Theorizing the Drones” by Chamayou uses the psychological effect of government officials tracking and monitoring the people. Ender’s Game and the article “The Mystery of ISIS” by anonymous uses the psychological effect of terror and sense of belonging. All three readings create a sense of the overlapping theme of psychological effects of war.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare
    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes In The United States
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Strikes In The United States

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone Usage in America

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benefits of Drones
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Benefits of Drones

    B. According to Harvard Political Review, With the money saved by switching to drones from manned aircraft, America can strengthen the economy…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Drones Be Allowed In Warfare Essay
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Drones Be Allowed In Warfare Essay

    Innocent people have been lost due to terrorist attacks. So why is the U.S. retaliating with drones unfair? Drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are controlled by pilots. There are no people physically in the drone. Drones also have a precise aim, and many innocent people would be spared. Drones should be allowed during warfare. Since drones have an accurate aim, it would be less likely to injure or kill innocent people.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Rigalia's Drone Strikes Have Targeted Non Combatant Civilians?
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Does Rigalia's Drone Strikes Have Targeted Non Combatant Civilians?

    Thus, Ardenia must adduce ‘fully conclusive evidence’to prove that Rigalia's drone strikes have targeted non-combatant civilians, which is an allegation of ‘exceptional gravity’. No such evidence has been presented, much less alleged with sufficient particularity as to evoke a semblance of certainty. Instead, the uses of precision weaponry attack which the elimination of 15 important Zetian separatist leaders show that Rigalia's attacks are not indiscriminate or disproportionate. The proportionality rule attaches to specific attacks, not large military campaigns. As such,Rigalia’s strikes would be disproportionate only if the civilian loss of life expected from each strike would exceed its concrete and direct military advantage. In each operation, the anticipated military advantage of preemptively disabling or disrupting potential deadly ZSM attacks by eliminating their leaders outweighed the comparatively low civilian loss of life…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics